A widespread but poorly executed plot?

(monkey screwing a football)

We watched the quadripartite building security camera show last night on several TeeVee news shows.  You know, the one in which the poll workers shoo the GOP poll watchers and press out of the big counting room at the Farm State Arena and then pull suit cases of something out from under a table and get to counting.

Several interesting things about this;  1.  They all seem to have been pre-briefed and are acting as a team, 2.  They seem oblivious of the permanent security cameras in the room, 3. The GOP somehow obtained these tapes.  Outraged security guard maybe? 

The governator of Georgia, a one time Trumpista, now says that maybe, maybe something bad happened in that room, maybe.  And maybe, maybe, there should be an audit.

It seems to be the case that a lot of effective skullduggery happened in quite a few states in this election, but it was poorly and clumsily done.  A lot of it was more or less in plain sight if one had eyes to see.  Truck drivers were tasked to haul pallets of Biden ballots from place to place.  Biden ballots were run through counting machines ten times.  Remarkable!  Magic computer networks!  

This sounds to me to be something like a plot cooked up by a group of self important but not too clever Ivy grads sitting around at somewhere like ... Brooklyn?

"We could do this" one cries out! "We could make it happen!"

So, the concept was great, but the execution was piss poor (army talk).  This may bite them in the ass yet.  (more army talk)  pl

Comments

[Deap]

Scott Adams (Dilbert) hour long sane analysis of where we are with the election, as of when he made this video: https://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.com/2020/11/07/scott-adams-2/

Keeping in mind Adams' scenario about Domininon and Smartronics (sp?) and the allegedly new development today of Soros Open Society hiring the President of Smartronics (sp?) (Lord something and another) the new Open Society Chairman was an event that happened after he made this tape. If this event happened.

However, Adams key point is fake news won the election more than anything else. Biden just had more fake news going for him, and Trump had more fake news going against him. And that is the Zeitgeist of the times. No voter is forced to chose one set of fake news over any other. But the Zeitgeist of "happy" fake news just may have made the difference over choosing the relentless barrage of negative fake news about Trump.

It is a sobering hour spent with a shrewd thinker ... who i believe cares even when he says he does not. He cares in the big picture, because we all do. Even if this means we have to accept outcomes we don't like, we accept them because we care.

[Fred]

Leith,

Yeah, Tulsi spending hundreds of thousands at a friend's digital marketing agency based in BF Montana, one with zero political marketing experience, well, nothing to see here, and maybe Bejing Biden will give her a job. Nice principles.

[JohninMK]

Colonel, I found the analysis at this link reassuring, I wonder if it can possibly be true.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-12-04-situation-update-dec-4th-offensive-cyber-warfare-mechanisms.html

[longarch]

The Twisted Genius wrote:

That first clown claims to be an "electronic intelligence analyst under 305th Military Intelligence with experience gathering SAM missile system electronic intelligence." Sounds like a case of stolen valor. The 305th MI is a training unit providing initial MOS training to new MI recruits. In other words, he's a bullshit artist. His China connection is a URL "dominionvotingsystems(dot)com" registered through GoDaddy and sitting on a 169 server in China. If anything that is a Chinese attempt to hack the real dominionvoting.com network which does belong to Dominion Voting Systems. He makes the same error with Iran and edisonresearch(dot)xn.

I don't see who the first "clown" is. I followed all the links and I only found stories such as:

https://bustednuckles.com/2020/11/27/exhibit-105-documents-intentional-cyber-security-malfeasance-allowing-foreign-interference-in-our-election/#comment-42310

I presume that is the first "clown." He does not seem clownish to me.

Both IT experts seem to be trying to baffle us with bullshit. This seems to be a theme with so many of these affidavits. Whether the Elite Strike Force and the Kraken are fooled by this stuff or wittingly employing this dodgy stuff is an open question. Given their reluctance to attest to this stuff in court so far, I think it's a legal tactic of attempting to baffle the courts and legislative committees with bullshit.

There is a huge number of witnesses. All the witnesses I have looked into have seemed to be free of bullshit. I do not regard accusations of bullshit as productive unless we can narrow it down to specific witnesses arguing specific points. Quite possibly SOME of the witnesses are full of fertilizer. However, according to the Throckmorton Precedent, ANY Democrat fraud vitiates any possibility of the Democrats winning the election.

Thus the anti-fraud forces only have to get lucky ONCE. The pro-fraud forces have to be lucky every time.

[Keith Harbaugh]

Regarding the comments from TTG,
the first one with non-empty contents is:

-------

pl,

You seem to be able to see my comments, but they appear as empty comments on the blog. Typepad must be doing something hinky with my account. I will try making a new TTG account to try to fix it.

Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 05 December 2020 at 11:18 AM

-------

Both before and after that comment there are four "comments"
without content, viz:

Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 04 December 2020 at 08:37 PM
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 05 December 2020 at 10:56 AM
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 05 December 2020 at 01:32 PM
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 05 December 2020 at 04:17 PM

[lux]

I don't see who the first "clown" is. I followed all the links and I only found stories such as:
...
I presume that is the first "clown." He does not seem clownish to me.
Posted by: longarch | 06 December 2020 at 09:52 AM

longarch, TTG didn't call Krejci a clown. That's pretty obvious. Krejci doesn't serve as witness IT or not for the Sidney/Wood team. Thus, it can't be David Krejci whom TTG refers to.

TTG wrote: "I agree with your and Barbara Ann’s jaundiced impressions of those IT experts' (exhibits 12 and 13) affidavits about voter fraud. That first clown claims to be an "electronic intelligence analyst under 305th Military Intelligence with experience gathering SAM missile system electronic intelligence." Sounds like a case of stolen valor."

Apparently he agrees with Krecji. He does not consider the expert credible or competent, which doesn't mean he considers Krecji a clown. But then, Krecji is no expert witness. His hightly critical comment appears in one of the many blogs where the "white-hat-expert" is taken quite serious.

There are two exhibits I am aware of claiming IT expertise. One of them is Russel Ramsland, the other the "white-hat-expert". Ramsland's affidavit covers more ground than IT. He is the expert who claimed there were districts with 100% or more votes cast. Which indeed is impossible. Problem official numbers tell us it isn't so.

Larry Johnson (Nov. 21, A Patriot Call To Action) referred to the part of Ramsland's affidavit mentioned above. Ramsfeld has an Harvard MBA background, but apparently he works with people in the field of electronic security and forensics too, among other things on election fraud.

Barbara Ann filed a link containing the whole series of cases including affidavits filed in Georgia.

One of the rare collections that lists all court files including affidavits by both witnesses and experts. Starting with the Lin Wood case. Lin Wood later joined Powell. They are listed with letters here, not numbers in this database. You can search Ramsland. Lin Wood filed his affidavit on Nov. 18.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18632787/wood-v-raffensperger/

[lux]

longarch,
you probably aren't interested but the motion to dismiss Kraken Sidney's experts by the defendants discusses each of them, including Ronald Watkins, the founder and administrator of 8chun and 8kun.

I am only familiar with Ramsland, the white-hat-expert, apparently labeled Spyder by Powell's team and Briggs via his website where he posted his expertise. Maybe I'll take a look at the other experts.

Defendants motion to dismiss experts:
https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Motion-to-Exclude-Testimony.pdf

[The Twisted Genius]

longtarch,

My comments were about two specific, but unnamed, individuals who prepared affidavits in a link first provided by Barbara Ann on 4 Dec.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.azd.1255923/gov.uscourts.azd.1255923.1.5.pdf

That first individual is not only a clown, but a lying stolen valor SOB. The second individual did not make any outrageous claim about his background so I wouldn't characterize him as a clown. Neither of these individuals are what I would expect for an expert witness in a court of law. Nor would I consider the evidence presented in either affidavit germane to a case of massive voter fraud. They both contain errors and innuendo indicative of these individuals' status as not expert witnesses.

The link to the motion to exclude testimony provided by lux provides the State of Georgia's assessment of several similar expert witnesses, some of who have been discussed previously here on SST especially the theory of Shiva Ayyadurai. With the caliber of experts and witnesses brought forth by the "Elite Legal Strike Force" so far, it is no wonder their cases have all been lost or dismissed except one which did get half a dozen votes thrown out in Pennsylvania. They better step up their game if they want to save Trump's ass.

[longarch]

@ The Twisted Genius:

Thank you for clarifying. At this moment, I cannot verify that the individual who made Exhibit 12 is guilty of stolen valor. However, if that claim can be proven, it is likely to be legally relevant.

@lux Thanks for the discussion and PDF.

I had heard a great deal of excitement about Philip Waldron.

Col. Philip Waldron (US Army-Retired) served over 30 years as a U.S. Military Intelligence Officer specializing in cyber security focused on election manipulation. Waldron is considered an expert on automated voting machines, who, as part of his training and experience, knows exactly how voting machines can be corrupted.

Col. Waldron served the bulk of his career with the 305th Military Intelligence Battalion – a group long known in military circles as “The Kraken.”

In testimony before both the PA and AZ legislatures, Col. Waldron revealed that his cyber security team has been monitoring the U.S. election system – including its voting machines - since August.

“The voting systems in the U.S. and in Pennsylvania were built to be manipulated,” Col. Waldron told the Pennsylvania legislature last week.

Waldron went on to state that U.S. election equipment like Dominion Voting Systems offers all have "similar code and similar functions" as the Smartmatic voting software. In fact, said the Colonel, nearly every voting system used in the 2020 General election used a derivative of the Smartmatic software.

https://lc.org/newsroom/details/20201201election-fraud-exposed-by-a-cyber-security-expert

Initially, I had misunderstood some comments here and I had thought they referred to Waldron. Thanks for explaining.

[vig]

longarch, thanks for the reference. Friend of lux.

We definitively deal with two distinct issues here.

a) election fraud as completely non-partisan issue, especially concerning electronic voting machines. But historically a complaint long before.

b) in its most extreme version, the theory that the Democrats not only manipulated this election but actually have been doing this for decades.

**********
Concerning the Smartmatic - Dominion link, I would be interested in the expertise of someone that studied voting machines, the programs they use and used over the decades. From a purely technical perspective.

It definitively is a niche product thus it is easy to understand there aren't many competitors. On the other hand elections and especially counting is a rather monotonous manual matter. ...

What I am slightly wondering about at this point in time, or after all these years, would Colonel Lang accept the theory that there may be not so helpful cool-aiders around Trump too? Creating a lot of cacophonies?