Back in early 1981, I did a few “odd jobs” between graduating from the Infantry Officer Advanced Course and starting the SF Officers Course. One of these jobs was as an ARTEP evaluator for a mech infantry company on Fort Benning. While I had plenty of book learning about tank-mech infantry teams, I was much more comfortable following a dismounted night attack through a cold January swamp. There was no Moon and a stiff, steady breeze so I felt we were making a stealthy approach. Although the attack was well executed, I learned something disconcerting during the after action review. Our night approach through the swamp was monitored by a high flying AC-130 gunship from 1st SOW. The gunship caught the heat signature of each approaching soldier as they silently slid through that moonless swamp. The lesson I took was that the idea of remaining undetected in uninhabited forests and mountains was a myth. Combine that with the Fort Benning aphorism, “If you can be seen, you can be killed” and I quickly became enamored with the concept of urban guerrilla warfare once I reached 10th Group. We would survive behind the Iron Curtain only by hiding among those we were to liberate from oppression.
So what does this stroll down memory lane have to do with the new drone wars? A lot, actually. It’s the same principle. Armies can be seen and killed from above by a wide range of drones in 2020 just as we could be seen and killed by the AC-130 back in 1980. The difference lies in the proliferation of these drones and the fact that they are less expensive than manned aircraft. They also don’t expose pilots or operators to death or capture.
First there were our Predators and Reapers hunting down jihadis and the occasional wedding party. We have well over 500 of these heavy drones. We have even more smaller drones down to man packed, hand launched tactical varieties. But we are not alone anymore. China is producing them like gangbusters. Turkey has emerged as a major leader in the development and employment of drones. One of these, the Bayratkar T2B, has had success in Syria, Libya and Azerbaijan. Erdogan has also deployed the T2B against the PKK within Turkey and northern Iraq.
The T2B is a medium altitude tactical drone. It has a range of more than 150 km and can fly at a maximum altitude of 22,500 feet. It has a maximum speed of 120 knots, a cruise speed of 70 knots and endurance of more than 24 hours. The T2B is powered with a 100 horsepower Rotax civil engine, an engine common to ultralight and homebuilt aircraft. The unit cost of the aircraft itself is less than 100 thousand dollars. Its electro-optical reconnaissance, surveillance and targeting system is now produced by Aselan in Turkey at a cost of 400 thousand dollars per unit. Although it does use GPS, it is not satellite controlled. Ground stations control the T2B by line-of-sight radio signal. The munitions, also produced in Turkey by Roketsan, are laser-guided, precision, long range and light weight. They include thermobaric and tandem warheads effective against reactive armor. Overall, the T2B is an impressive piece of kit.
As I mentioned, the PKK were the first to feel the wrath of the T2B. Those fighters hiding in the hills and mountains of eastern Turkey and northern Iraq have been getting clobbered since the droness were employed against them. I’m sure they learned the same lesson I learned forty years ago in that Fort Benning swamp. The difference is that my lesson was academic, the PKK’s lesson was catastrophically lethal. Erdogan also used the T2B and other drones against the YPG/SDF over the last few years.
The first time the T2B gained notoriety in the West was when they were used as part of Turkey’s Spring 2020 counterattack against the very successful R+5 Idlib Dawn offensive. A large number of T2Bs, along with a smaller number of the larger, satellite-controlled Anka medium drones were deployed from 1 to 5 March. At a loss of six drones, Turkey claimed it destroyed over a hundred SAA armored vehicles, dozens of artillery systems and hundreds of SAA troops. Take that claim with a grain of salt, but Russia and the SAA agreed to a ceasefire immediately after that.
Turkish drones also played a significant role, along with the imported Syrian jihadis, in stopping Haftar’s LNA from taking Tripoli in early 2020. Until that time Haftar was using Chinese made Wing Loong drones to great effect. The GNA compensated for the shorter range of the newly arrived T2Bs by establishing radio relay sites to extend their operational range. The T2Bs used a Turkish EW suite to jam the Russian made Pantsir-1 units and took them out systematically. They then played havoc among Haftar's forces deployed in the flatness of northern Libya. Haftar and the Wagner Group were forced to withdraw from the outskirts of Tripoli.
The newest deployment of the T2B is in the current Armenian-Azerbijani war. The Azeri and Armenian forces are generally similar in equipment, manpower and training. However, the Azeri’s employment of R2B drones has been devastating to the Armenian armor and artillery in Nagorno-Karabakh. The Azeris are advancing with the help of those R2B drones. There is a constant stream of drone kill porn on the internet. This time it is Armenian targets being snuffed rather than footage of Predators snuffing jihadis.
The proliferation of attack drones, especially Turkish drones, is changing ground warfare. In Syria, Russia rushed additional air defense capabilities to SAA front line units to blunt the threat of Turkish drones. Movement, dispersion and concealment methods required modification. A hull down position for an AFV is nothing to a drone. After the March 2020 drone attacks in Idlib, the Russians sent wreckage of those Turkish drones back to Moscow to develop an effective countermeasure. They have now rushed the KRET Krasukha electronic jamming system to their base in Armenia where the system reportedly caused nine drones to loose connection with their control stations and crash. The Krashukha also blocks GPS signals to prevent drones from automatically returning to base. The T2B doesn’t appear to have that feature, but many drones do. In my opinion, this is the most promising countermeasure to the widespread use of drones. The Russian military, due to their massive investment in radio-electronic combat (REC) is in the best position to pursue this countermeasure. We could someday soon see serious deployment of REC at the company and battalion level. Sure we can change our TTPs (tactics, techniques and procedures) to reduce our vulnerabilities to the threat of constant areal surveillance and attack, but that would be debilitating to normal operations. We best get to stepping in developing and widely deploying an effective EW capability. China is right up there with Turkey and the US in the development of drone warfare.
TTG
https://theintercept.com/2019/05/14/turkey-second-drone-age/
https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/turkeys-drone-war-syria-red-team-view
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/5/28/largest-drone-war-in-the-world-how-airpower-saved-tripoli
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiSTvlBYx14 (fresh drone porn)
https://asiatimes.com/2020/10/russia-knocking-turkish-drones-from-armenian-skies/
TTG,
"caught the heat signature of each approaching soldier"
How do you distinguish the soldier as an individual from a deer or buffalo or whatever? In regards to the "jihadis and the occasional wedding party", how do you tell them appart? If you're in close (enough) combat, how to tell friend from foe?
Posted by: Fred | 29 October 2020 at 09:05 PM
Fred,
A soldier walks upright and carries a weapon. A deer walks on four thin legs and eats grass. A buffalo is just one big son of a bitch. All that was easily discernible 40 years ago. The images are even clearer today. Clearly you’ve never seen IR imagery. Either that or you have a serious cognitive perception problem. Don’t go volunteering for one of those Montreal cognitive tests, my friend. The lion, rhino and camel will leave you “buffaloed.”
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 29 October 2020 at 09:58 PM
EW might be effective as a counter-measure, but there is another possibility: drones killing drones, i.e. unmanned air-to-air combat.
That surely eill come; any idea on its status?
Posted by: Keith Harbaugh | 29 October 2020 at 10:18 PM
Glint detection systems would work, too. Since these are all line of sight sensors.
Posted by: Jimmy_W | 29 October 2020 at 10:48 PM
Keith Harbaugh,
The concept has definitely been explored. In 2018 a Reaper drone armed with AA missiles successfully shot down a drone. Unmanned fighters are moving along in development. I imagine quite a few medium and heavy drones can carry AA missiles, but then it becomes a matter of priorities. Do you use your drones to hunt other drones or hit the ground targets?
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 29 October 2020 at 10:50 PM
Fred,
In case you are interested in some demos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCiy3iHG14E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AntsLHnrFXM
"stealth" on the field has a whole new meaning these days.
Ishmael Zechariah
Posted by: Ishmael Zechariah | 29 October 2020 at 10:51 PM
Jimmy_W
How does that work with drones? I searched and only found references to human pupil glint detection.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 29 October 2020 at 11:01 PM
Austria has allegedly stopped Rotax from supplying any more 912 and 915 fuel injected engines to Turkey. I always wondered why my engine is controlled through a pair of connectors the way it is, I guessed that this was to provide an easy plug and play interface for drones. I’ve also been told that the new 915 (turbocharged, injected) engine was developed with U.S. defence department money.
Posted by: walrus | 29 October 2020 at 11:16 PM
On the drone-versus-drone thing,
I can see the day when infantry units carry along their own CAP of defensive drones, along with their offensive ones.
Then too, there is a wide variety of SAMs which can be employed against drones
Posted by: Keith Harbaugh | 29 October 2020 at 11:19 PM
BTW, another issue is whether the resolution from satellites is good enough to pick up drones, but that is probably classified.
At least such things used to be.
Posted by: Keith Harbaugh | 29 October 2020 at 11:30 PM
Walrus,
I'd bet Turkey is already working on their own drone engines. It's not that difficult an engineering problem. Turkey replaced the targeting camera system last year with their own design after Canada cut off the supply. Turkey has a robust arms industry.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 30 October 2020 at 12:20 AM
Keith,
I remember having designated aircraft spotters during platoon movements and in convoys. We also practiced shooting target "bats" out of the sky with only infantry platoon weapons. I can definitely see drone defense becoming an integral part of combat arms training. I can see dedicated drone detection and defense vehicles at the company and battalion level. Maybe even at the platoon level. We often trained with a M-113 mounted Vulcan gun and a Redeye team attached to our light infantry company.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 30 October 2020 at 12:28 AM
I remember with the "Hammer's Slammers" science fiction series that the tanks that the Slammers use would have an automated anti-aircraft automatic weapon mounted on top of them. I wonder if that might be the way of the future, some sort of gun based SHORAD on valuable armored vehicles? If done right it could double as an APS that could target things like incoming ICM shells before they release their bomblets.
Posted by: MisanthropicUSA | 30 October 2020 at 12:41 AM
The Turks used those Bayratkar T2B (aka TB2) attack drones in Libya also for their GNA allies. But the LNA claimed that they shot down 17 of them. Wonder if the Krasukha jammer you mention was shipped there?
The T2B/TB2 and its predecessors were designed by a young Turkish whiz kid and MIT graduate. He is now the CTO of the company that makes them, which is owned or co-owned by Erdogan's son-in-law.
Stopping shipment of components by the west won't bring production to a halt. They have already had time to reverse engineer the Austrian made engines, the UK weapon racks, and Canadian EO.
A bigger problem than the TB2 will be the new Batraktar Akinci, that can carry 1350 kg and has a ceiling of 40K feet. Its first flight test was last December. The other Turkish aerospace companies are not neglecting the UAV business either. TUSAS is working on a supersonic drone supposedly capable of deceiving threat air defense systems. Vestel is also working on drones but so far they haven't come close to anything that Baykar and TUSAS is doing.
Posted by: Leith | 30 October 2020 at 12:43 AM
In the late ‘90s I became peripherally involved in RF links & sensor technology for US military UAV / UAS applications. The concepts of operation were way ahead of the physical hw & sw. Innovation in those concepts were the use of space-based systems & the serious consideration of small unit (volume production) / spl forces (mission-specific) applications & product development. Folk might be surprised that unmanned drones launched (can’t help a pun) at the beginning of flight Itself - a confluence of automated flight control, real-time remote controls & airborne training targets. Field development, testing & even use of drone technology for combat took place in WWII (how Joe Kennedy Jr. was KIA over the English Channel) & in VN.
TTG makes two critical points;
- Drones (& ground-based robotics) have taken Spectrum Wars to a whole new level.
- Urban Operations already complicated, are even further complicated. Unfortunately, expect even more fratricide (proportionally) than in the past, and non-combatant losses (aka collateral damage or women, children & aged). Such is the march of technology in warfare.
Posted by: ked | 30 October 2020 at 01:07 AM
There are lots of verified and mostly unverified claims by LNA as well as by Armenian forces of how many drones they actually shot down or made to land. Do not forget that Iran managed to interact with and land a US drone a few years back. So this is a technical area that is fast changing. There is no reason to arrogantly assume that "non-western" upstart actors such as Turkey and Iran can be stopped by arms Embargoes.
Turkey will be able to replace the engine and the optics pod that seem to have now been banned by Canada and its Austrian Subsidiary, in the medium term, the embargo will be an incentive. I also found out that some of these items are easily obtainable through alternate means, being dual use technology.
Finally, the US arms embargo, post the 1974 Cyprus operation by Turkey was the prime driver in the development of the Turkish arms industry. So sanctioning and banning can only go so far.
Posted by: kodlu | 30 October 2020 at 05:42 AM
In its last two years(2017-2018), ISIS deployed DIY attack drones on all fronts, these would drop standardized shrapnel munitions that would cause severe wounds in a wide radius. More than any actual personnel/materiel loss, these would take a terrible psychological toll on whoever IS was fighting. There are a couple hundred POV video clips from that period of these drones being used, most of these attacks are against bunched up groups of Iraqi/SAA/SDF personnel but there are notable exceptions that stick out in my mind: a direct hit against a moving Iraqi humvee filled with munition, which caused it to immediately explode. An attack against a massive SAA munitions dump in the deir ezzor stadium. Boats ferrying the SDF across the euphrates being targeted midriver. I don't think we have seen the last of this. Also, you may laugh now, but I believe that jetpacks, maybe more so than drones, have the potential to revolutionize asymmetrical warfare.
Posted by: Serge | 30 October 2020 at 08:36 AM
TTG,
" Either that or you have a serious cognitive perception problem. Don’t go volunteering for one of those Montreal cognitive tests, my friend. "
Thanks for the very unnecessary personal attack. Why on earth would a submariner ever see IR signatures? Asking a basic a question was really just too much?
Posted by: Fred | 30 October 2020 at 08:36 AM
It's really quite tragic to see the Armenians have looked on for 12 years of conflict in Syria, seen Turkey's acquisition of Israeli drones and then fielding their own remote controlled armed drones extensively in Syria, and done absolutely NOTHING in the way of countermeasures, new weapon systems purchases etc.
Their command is criminally liable for sending thousands of young to some unofficial region to be killed under uncontested airspace by what are literally a step above remote controlled hobby aircraft, but with FLIR cameras and laser glide munitions.
It's been nearly a month now and it seems the Armenian side is either blind, in denial or delusional, but someone higher up must have noticed they are losing hundreds of tanks and thousands of young men to these things by now.
If I were Armenian, I would be pondering the sacking or assassinations of the military and political leaders responsible right about now.
Posted by: Peter in Toronto | 30 October 2020 at 09:26 AM
Fred,
Yes, I was having a little fun at your expense. Sorry I offended you so much. I'm surprised you've never seen IR imagery. It's all over the internet and TV news. It's been in movies since at least "Predator" in 1987. I hope Ishmael's examples of the pig hunt enlightened you.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 30 October 2020 at 10:00 AM
Peter in Toronto,
I think you're getting a little carried away.
The Armenians rely on the Russians quite a bit. The Russians maintain, minimally, an air wing and a combat brigade in Armenia - and have for many years. The Russian military advises and assists the Armenian military. I'm sure the Russians were not too happy about this latest little war flaring up, but, otoh, it is a good opportunity to try out some new capabilities, like the belladonna anti-drone system; which appears to work rather well.
The drones will be effectively countered in short order, IMO. The Armenians have drones too that have utilized to good effect on the Azeri/Turks
Posted by: Eric Newhill | 30 October 2020 at 10:04 AM
TTG,
"I was having a little fun at your expense."
Your inner Trump is coming out.
If memory serves the IDF was able to identify tanks two or three miles away back in '73, however they shot up a bunch of their own because they couldn't tell friend form foe. Regarding Ismael's pig hunt (beside being illegal to hunt after sunset just about everywhere) I am reminded of the hunter in Maine who shot his neighbor's wife in her back yard claiming her white gloves looked like a deer's tail. "Trigger discipline" as the guy in Black Hawk Down put it.
https://newengland.com/today/living/new-england-history/karenwood/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb5quj6ZhJM
I agree with you that infantry tactics have to change. Peter in Toronto is also right in asking just what we've done about countermeasures in the past decade. The Obama administration sure made it safe for LGBTQetc but dropped the ball on a lot of stuff. The now scrapped LCS program being a prime example.
Posted by: Fred | 30 October 2020 at 10:18 AM
Another coming threat is the rapid development of drone swarm tactics. Here is a recent account of a project in China:
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/37062/china-conducts-test-of-massive-suicide-drone-swarm-launched-from-a-box-on-a-truck
Posted by: JerseyJeffersonian | 30 October 2020 at 10:59 AM
Oh, and wars always come home, for good or for ill:
https://www.ajc.com/news/if-you-call-911-in-brookhaven-a-drone-might-respond-soon/DAA5KFEAHVCZRNVQJTPNEWVQIY/
My first response is that it's a good strategy to not send police into unduly ambiguous situations where they or others may be adversely effected. Reconaissance is your friend.
Posted by: JerseyJeffersonian | 30 October 2020 at 11:15 AM
@Eric Newhill
I've seen no evidence of the Russians deploying any of this equipment in the disputed warzone, perhaps in Armenia proper, but that does nothing for the Armenians getting pounded in the trenches in NK. We would have seen quite a bit of wreckage by now as these things would be downed over Armenian lines.
What we have even seen are quite a few videos of these remote controlled aircraft dismantling Armenia's dated air defense network, including their Soviet-era S-300 tactical systems which seem to struggle with small, slow-moving targets like these drones.
Posted by: Peter in Toronto | 30 October 2020 at 12:09 PM