One year before Jim Comey was immersed in his plot to overthrow Donald Trump, the duly elected President of the United States, a brave Foreign Service Officer at the U.S. Department of State came forward with firsthand information of Hillary Clinton’s rampant abuse of Classified material. The man, a senior State Department diplomat who had served as the acting Ambassador (Chargé d’Affaires) in the Asia Pacific region under President Clinton, also was a veteran of the U.S. Army during the Vietnam War.
The letter from this whistleblower is stunning and I am going to present it in total. It is dated 10 January 2016. You can read it for yourself here starting at page 121. I became aware of this letter thanks to the assiduous research and writings of Charles Ortel (he wrote about this recently at the American Thinker).
The letter explains in great detail how Hillary and her cabal of sychophants used an unclassified system to disseminate Top Secret and Secret intelligence. But the Senior Diplomat did not stop there. He explained carefully and specifically who the FBI needed to interview and the questions they needed to ask. You do not need to take my word for it. You can read the letter for yourself.
And what did the sanctimonious, smug buffoon heading up the FBI do? Nothing. But this senior Foreign Service Officer was dogged in making sure the FBI had the information. He called FBI Headquarters and could not get any confirmation that his letter was accepted. Not satisfied, he walked into the FBI’s Washington Field Office. The results of this meeting were reported to three FBI Agents working on the Hillary Clinton investigation. Named in the report are Peter Strzok and Jonathan Moffa (the third name is blacked out).
Here is the report in its entirety. Please note that the State Department official delivered the information on the 27th of January 2016, but the report was not written up until four weeks later–22 February 2016. (You can see the original on the FBI website here starting at page 11.)
I do not know if John Durham has seen these documents. I am posting to make sure that he does. There is no evidence that Inspector General Horowitz examined these documents or interviewed the Foreign Service Officer. With Secretary of State Pompeo’s promise that Hillary emails will be forthcoming, I think it is worthwhile to revisit what this brave whistleblower tried to bring to the attention of the FBI, who clearly was hellbent on protecting Hillary rather than pursing justice and upholding the law. Shameful.
A timeline - of loose ends:
MARCH 2016 - FBI gets notice from Dutch Intelligence who was sweeping Russian communications that a "Letter" was found:
Russian intelligence allegation: A letter exists from DNC Chairwoman Wasserman-Schultz to Open Society Director Bernardo claiming key Clinton campaign staffer Amanda Renteria was assured by AG Loretta Lynch .... "the investigation( into Clinton's emails) would not go too far". (Mar 2016)
MAY 3, 2016: Comey testifies to Senate he is worried AG Lynch is compromised about prosecuting Clinton, due to this "letter" - even if it is unknown if this is a valid claim, or just Russian disinformation, but since the claim exists and could come out later it would taint any action AG Lynch takes, .......according to Comey.( May 2016)
JUNE 28, 2016: Bill Clinton-AG Lynch 20 minute tarmac meeting
(Was this an intentional taint of Lynch so she clearly could not rule on the Clinton email server misuse?) (June 2016)
JULY 5, 2016 -Comey announces no action will be taken against Clinton for her email and private use server - unilaterally and unconventionally usurps this final decision from the proper decision maker AG Lynch (July 2016)
NOV 2016: Clinton loses - Trump win - IC Russiagate hoax well underway
MAY 9, 2017 - Trump fires Comey
FEB 17, 2020 - "Secret on the Tarmac" published - reporter who broke the story of the Bill Clinton-Lynch meeting, senses there was more to this than just an accidental meeting
MARCH 2020 - Covid- Covid - Covid - Covid - Covid - Covid
Questions:
Did Comey have a "higher duty" to take this matter away from Lynch because he felt it was too tainted to in her hands due to this alleged "Letter"?
Did Comey set up Lynch, in order to take this matter out her hands because he was in on the original Trump Russia-gate distracton deal set up by Clinton?
How much did AG lynch know about the Clinton-Russiagate plot against Trump?
THE TRIGGER: "The Letter:" Wasserman-Schultz to Open Society Director Bernardo about alleged AG Lynch to Renteria assurances that Clinton would escape prosecution for email abuses.
A. Real?
B. Russian disinformation?
How does this scenario relate to the recent declassification of alleged Clinton email claiming she wanted to cook up a Trump-Russia connection as a false distraction, in order to take pressure off her own pre-election email scandals?
Posted by: Deap | 11 October 2020 at 07:22 PM