"The priests and scholars “protest against and condemn the sacrilegious and superstitious acts committed by Pope Francis, the Successor of Peter, in connection with the recent Amazon Synod held in Rome,” and they give detailed evidence of the different incidences of pagan worship during the Amazon Synod.
Most prominently, Pope Francis hosted a pagan ceremony with Pachamama statues in the Vatican Gardens on Oct. 4 and even blessed one of the statues. Additionally, he prayed in front of the Pachamama statue at St. Peter's Cathedral on October 7 and then accompanied it in procession into the synod hall." lifesitenews
-------------
Pope Francis appears to be intent on re-defining the Catholic body of teaching as understood and developed for two millennia.
He agrees with the Sheikh of the Al-Azhar mosque/university that God welcomes a diversity or religions. This is a direct contradiction of Catholic belief in the singular nature of Christianity in God's "eyes."
He told an Italian communist atheist author friend that he does not believe that Jesus Rose as an actual man and in his own body which later ascended into heaven. He said that "a spirit" resembling Jesus rose from the tomb on Easter. The belief in the Resurrection is the central tenet of the Catholic Faith. I wonder what he thinks happened to the body since the Gospel is quite clear that the tomb was empty at Easter.
And now he has sponsored the worship of an animist cult within the precincts of St. Peter's Basilica and the Vatican Gardens and blessed one of their idols.
IMO, unless he is willing try to pronounce ex-cathedra as to the orthodoxy of his faith, he has a limited future as pope. pl
Correct me if I am wrong, but as I understand Canon Law, there is no procedure for removing a pope. If that is the case, the only way Francis will leave his position as Pope is by resignation or death.
Posted by: Jus'Thinkin | 13 November 2019 at 02:59 PM
jus'thinkin
Nobody had seen a pope resign until Benedict. Canon law? When was the last time we had a heretic pope?
Posted by: turcopolier | 13 November 2019 at 03:30 PM
I am not leaving the Catholic Church but the Catholic Church certainly seems to be leaving me.
Posted by: Dave Schuler | 13 November 2019 at 03:40 PM
I consider myself a conservative Catholic but I’m almost as cautious of characterizations of the Holy Father coming from the Sedevacantist-leaning traditionalists as I am with the mainstream media covering Trump. The Holy Father has been rock solid on marriage, the family, and abortion. But the heresy hunters look for ecumenical transgressions like Adam Schiff looks for foreign policy transgressions by Trump.
St. Ignatius of Loyola, “Ruies of Thinking with the Church”:
Harvard Law professor and staunch Catholic (convert), Adrian Vermeule, believes this criticism of the Holy Father Is rooted in a kind of crypto-Protestantism and all of the error of pride that entails. Here’s a recent tweet from Prof. Vermeule on this subject/TLM:
Posted by: Vernon C. | 13 November 2019 at 04:01 PM
Black Pope
Posted by: Harlan Easley | 13 November 2019 at 04:25 PM
Not as bad as having a joint religious ceremony/celebration with Talmudic Rabbis (i.e. Pharisees) whose 'Holy Book' teaches that "Christ is in hell drowning in boiling excrement" ...
...as John Paul II did.
Posted by: ThereisaGod | 13 November 2019 at 04:42 PM
The Roman Catholic Church where my son was married has an annual Blessing of the Animals ceremony.
---
Francis may be on the right side of history: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/52534.htm
"When Luis Fernando Camacho . . .
With a Bible in one hand and a national flag in the other, . . . bowed his head in prayer above the presidential seal, fulfilling his vow to purge his country’s Native heritage from government and “return God to the burned palace.”
“Pachamama will never return to the palace,” he said, referring to the Andean Mother Earth spirit. “Bolivia belongs to Christ.” . . .
He is a powerful multi-millionaire named in the Panama Papers, and an ultra-conservative Christian fundamentalist groomed by a fascist paramilitary notorious for its racist violence, with a base in Bolivia’s wealthy separatist region of Santa Cruz."
Dashing the Preferential Option for the Poor or blessing statues.
What would Jesus do?
Posted by: artemesia | 13 November 2019 at 04:44 PM
I wonder what would be the reaction of all these guardians of the rites and pomp if the Pope visits Wall Street and lashes at all the merchants in the temple. ¿Would that be heresy too?
The Catholic Church under the auspices of the polish pope lost Latin America, the Catholic Church has been supplanted by a constellation of evangelist freaks, extremist and greedy, fulfilling a political task, always against the interest of the locals. What can be said of such freaks whose unholy alliance with zionists is based on the final destruction of the ally?
Woytila scorning father and poet Cardenal in Nicaragua set the tone, and the results are there to see, Brasil with Bolsonaro, Guatemala with the pitiful comic, and now a coup in Bolivia to steal their riches, Tesla almost doubled its value after the coup, Bolivia’s lithium is there for the take.
Pope Francis should grasp the whip, and ban all the merchants of death from the Temple.
Posted by: Paco | 13 November 2019 at 04:58 PM
Catholics should begin speaking out at Mass, confronting their parish priests directly on all this, withholding the benjamins, etc.
My understanding is that in the olden times you were burned for heresy, and sometimes for sodomy, the two things the Catholic clerisy now seems infested with.
Posted by: Vegetius | 13 November 2019 at 05:00 PM
A good ol' christian coup like in Bolivia, so as to remove this red commie from office... It will be harder to pull in Europe, but I'm sure Boss tweet and his neo-confederate surrogates (Gingrich et al) are on the job.
Posted by: Augustin L | 13 November 2019 at 05:30 PM
Is there any chance we’ll hear from Ratzinger on this?
Additionally, Wikipedia asserts that Francis is planning to alter the role of the holy office (congregation for the doctrine of the faith).
Posted by: Dabbler | 13 November 2019 at 05:45 PM
WWJD
Posted by: Stephanie | 13 November 2019 at 05:46 PM
Renaissance was pretty full of non-popey Popes - t'was a political office secured through well-placed lucre and licentiousness..
Posted by: Factotum | 13 November 2019 at 06:45 PM
Factotum
Really, a political office? Hard to believe. You mean people like the Borgias? None of them were HERETICS! Try to get that straight.
Posted by: turcopolier | 13 November 2019 at 07:05 PM
Stephanis
Well, he might show up sitting on a bench in the Vatican Garden and ask Francis to touch his wounds. Rumor is that he did that with JP2 who asked if there would be women priests or married priests and was told "Not in your lifetime." JP2 then asked if there would be another Polish pope. To which Jesus replied "Not in my lifetime."
Posted by: turcopolier | 13 November 2019 at 07:10 PM
artemesia
What does the blessing of the animals have to do with heresy? They are God's creatures, as we are. Actually, the Catholic Church exists outside o history and those who have fouled it (many) will pay for that.
Posted by: turcopolier | 13 November 2019 at 07:15 PM
paco
"¿Would that be heresy too? " Marxist drivel.
Posted by: turcopolier | 13 November 2019 at 07:17 PM
VernonC
"The Holy Father has been rock solid on marriage, the family, and abortion." OK, but the church is primarily about salvation, not social good works. They are a secondary benefit.
Posted by: turcopolier | 13 November 2019 at 07:23 PM
Elora Danan
"Should Elora understand you are with those nazi thugs slaughtering poor Bolivian indigenous people in Bolivia right now," Childish. Praising Donald Trump does not make one a Nazi. As pope, Francis is God's vicar on earth. It does not make me a fundamentalist (another childish insult) to believe that if he persists in these deviations from Church teaching there will be a massive schism in the Catholic Church and he can go home to BA to live an unfettered life. As for Morales, the man deliberately violated the term limits provision in the Bolivian constitution.
Posted by: turcopolier | 13 November 2019 at 07:30 PM
Colonel,
The lefty news outlets I read say that the Bolivian Supreme Court abolished those term limits. I disagree with some rulings of the US supreme court, but I believe the rulings should nonetheless by respected.
Posted by: JamesT | 13 November 2019 at 07:51 PM
JamesT
But did Morales arrange for the court to end term limits? I do not know.
Posted by: turcopolier | 13 November 2019 at 09:59 PM
You were reading my mind Vernon C. I was wondering if it were possible that the colonel wrote this as a kind of metaphor, an allusion to Trump's travails, especially after hearing SO MUCH Congressional testimony today that focused on the POTUS' "irregular channels" in foreign policy. Sacre bleu! Heaven forbid! Still, I don't doubt Col. Lang's remarks about Pope Francis were made in earnest.
Posted by: akaPatience | 13 November 2019 at 10:15 PM
akaPatience
As hard as it may be to believe, there are people who are believers who can read, write, do calculus and the like. Trump is not the vicar of Christ. Francis is. Francis is making his own bed and will have to sleep in it. Trump's troubles are not, in my opinion, of his own creation. The State Department egoists who testified today hate the fact that the president does not need to conduct diplomacy through them. The "interagency" is nowhere mentioned in the constitution. Francis on the other hand is deliberately reversing not just the practice of the Church, things like having married clergy but also its baseline teachings, the things that make Christianity what it is. The Church has assimilated many alien faith practices in its long life but the risk to Francis in doing what he is doing is immense. These changes may well divide the Church into more than one body. This a mighty responsibility to take upon himself. He wants to be a modern Luther?
Posted by: turcopolier | 13 November 2019 at 10:40 PM
Nope.Green pope,and smart to acknowledge pachamama.wiki says
"In pre-Hispanic culture, Pachamama was often a cruel goddess eager to collect her sacrifices. After the conquest by Spain, conversion to Roman Catholicism took place and the figure of the Virgin Mary was equated with that of the Pachamama for many of the indigenous people.[4]
As Andean cultures form modern nations, Pachamama remains benevolent, giving,[5] and a local name for Mother Nature. Thus, many in South America believe that problems arise when people take too much from nature because they are taking too much from Pachamama."
So in actual fact acknowledgement of the current state of affairs involving the environment. Interesting that the Catholic religion put an end to human sacrifice. Stupid to think that European cultural and religious influence is a one way street.The winds of change are blowing.
Secondly no child in this day and age will accept beyond doubt that Christ rose from the dead.Sorry mate but that horse has bolted.His spirit might have but dead is dead.
The church and for that matter all religions have had a good run up to now.By being the gatekeepers of written word and knowledge few could question the facts.Sorry mate but that camel has also bolted.
Personally I believe in the one God.I have absolutely no doubt that God exists.The experiences are real.Religion is a social construct.Good for charity and moral support.However there is no direct connection between God and religion. The connection is solely between God and you.Of this I absolutely no doubt.
Posted by: anon | 13 November 2019 at 10:51 PM
The logical fallacy of monotheism is that a spiritual absolute would necessarily be the essence of sentience, from which we rise, not an ideal of wisdom and judgement, from which we fell. More the new born, than the wise old man. The light shining through the film, than the images on it.
Yet no culture could exist, if it simply reveled in sentience, so we have this top down father figure lawgiver, because the anarchy of desire has to be balanced by the tyranny of judgement. The heart and the head. Liberal and conservative. Youth and age. Cycles of expansion and consolidation.
When we confuse the ideal with the absolute, it does create some significant problems. For example, good and bad are not some cosmic duel between the forces of righteousness and evil, but the basic biological binary of beneficial and detrimental. The 1/0 of life, from which all the higher order social nuances rise. Respect, responsibility, honesty, trust, empathy, sympathy, etc. So when we treat the simple basics of good and bad as an ideal, rather then an essence, conflicts quickly devolve into a race to the bottom, of us, versus them, good, versus bad, rather then each side respecting the structure of civilized evolution on which they rest and being able to work through the complexities.
A good book on the history of Western civilization is Gilbert Murray's; The Five Stages of Greek Religion. One of the lessons drawn from his writings is that tribal beliefs tended towards forms of monotheism, as the tribal spirit. Against the larger world. It was with the advent of city states, that a form of multiculturalism emerged as poly and pantheisms. These were the cultural basis for the democracy of Greece and the republicanism of Rome. So when the west went back to a form of monotheism, in the Holy Trinity, the default civil system was monarchy. As in one god, one ruler. Divine right of kings. It was when the west went back to those more complex and interactive forms of government, that separation of church and state, culture and civics, became necessary.
I don't think the whole story is finalized just yet.
Posted by: John Merryman | 13 November 2019 at 10:56 PM