"DAMASCUS, SYRIA (06:05 PM) – Turkey is not planning to remain in Syria’s Afrin district indefinitely, according to Bekir Bozdağ, Deputy Prime Minister of Turkey.
Bozdağ made the remarks during a press conference on Monday, as reported by Turkish newspaper Hürriyet Daily News. The minister’s remarks come a day after rebel forces of the so-called Free Syrian Army (FSA), backed heavily by Turkish military support, captured Afrin city on Sunday.
According to Bozdağ, Turkey is planning to withdraw its armed forces from the region soon and return Afrin to “its rightful owners”. However, the Turkish minister failed to clarify who exactly he was referring to with this." (Al Masdar News)
**************************
This statement certainly was news to me. It could be a smokescreen, but I don’t see any reason Ankara would need a smokescreen. Perhaps eliminating the Kurdish threat is the real goal of operation Olive Branch. If true, it bodes well for the future of Syria. While I don’t know Erdogan’s full reasons for the operation, I strongly suspect that one of Russia’s goals for acquiescing to the operation was to force a breakup of the US-Kurdish marriage and a return of Rojava to Damascus. Now that Afrin has fallen, we must wait to see what the TSK and FSA have in store for Manbij. US troops are still in the area. Will they abandon their Kurdish allies in the face of a TSK/FSA advance? What happens when the TSK/FSA go after Kobane? I would think that the Kurds will eventually realize that the US is not their friend and ally and that taking the deal offered by Damascus is their only hope of resisting further Turkish predations.
The SAA offensive to reduce the East Ghouta pocket appears to be going well. It should. The SAA massed sufficient forces, the cream of the SAA, and applied sufficient supporting fires to ensure success. However, the fighting has not been without surprises. After inducing a large number of jihadis to surrender or be bussed to Idlib and successfully evacuating tens of thousands of civilians out of harms way, the SAA was hit by a surprise Daesh attack out of the Yarmouk refugee camp into the al Qadam district. Some SAA troops were surrounded for a short time before being rescued by a sharp counterattack. The SAA suffered high casualties at al Qadam requiring the redeployment of several assault units from the 4th Mechanized Division to reinforce the line. Daesh now control ninety percent of the al Qadam district in this back and forth battle.
The jihadis suffered heavy losses as a result of another one of their counterattacks targeting Masraba. They pushed forward recapturing a large swath of the district. The SAA again had to divert forces to stop the counterattack. After a day, the jihadis decided to pull back to their original positions in Douma. Unfortunately for them, the SAA caught them in an indirect and direct fire trap as they crossed an open area resulting in lots of dead jihadis.
To the southeast, the SAA and its militia allies stopped a sizable Daesh offensive just south of T2. This offensive consisted of numerous waves over two days. The jihadis simultaneously struck near al Mayadin and al Bukamal. The SAA called in airstrikes to beat back the attacks. Estimated casualties on both sides exceeded one hundred. The R+6 made a wise decision when they started reinforcing the Deir Ezzor area a few weeks ago.
In my opinion, all these battles point to the wisdom of reducing some of these pockets of jihadis before finally taking on the Idlib area. Those in the pockets are not defeated remnants waiting to be mopped up. They are organized units fully capable of offensive actions. They could create havoc if they attacked while the bulk of the SAA was engaged in Idlib. Perhaps now that the TSK/FSA has made Afrin safe for jihadis, the SAA can soon push the Idlib jihadis further north once that inevitable offensive kicks off.
The US is reportedly beefing up its garrison at al Tanf and establishing similar strongpoints in the YPG/SDF occupied areas east of the Euphrates. From these garrisons, Special Forces teams continue to organize, equip and train various shades of remnant jihadi outfits to ostensibly take on Daesh, but the real target appears to be the SAA and its allies. I try to imagine some of the conversations that must go on around the fire among these teams. Exasperated talk about what those idiots back in DC are thinking. Surly, mutinous talk that stays around the campfire, but also in the minds of the Green Berets. Once the campfires die out, they will move on and continue to fulfill their assigned missions to the best of their abilities.
General Votel may agree that Assad had won the civil war in Syria, but he knows this is far from over. The situation is still fraught with danger for all in the region.
TTG
https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/turkish-deputy-pm-turkey-will-not-remain-in-afrin/
https://ejmagnier.com/2018/03/20/why-afrin-has-fallen-us-turkish-russian-kurdish-roles/
https://ahvalnews2.com/afrin/ypg-live-fight-another-day-expert
https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201803071062325647-daesh-syria-offensive/
Sarah B
Whenever yuo talk abut "misinterpretations of Islam" you are on shaky ground. Islam is a religion without clergy and hierarchy in which doctrine is formed by consensus among scholars, not by fiat from a Muslim "Rome." To say that there are "misinterpretations of Islam" is equivalent to saying that that there is only one valid form of Christianity. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 22 March 2018 at 06:35 PM
And lest anyone doubt Trump's bad intentions:
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/22/hr-mcmaster-will-resign-as-trumps-national-security-advisor-and-will-be-replaced-by-john-bolton-nyt-citing-sources.html
Posted by: Sid_finster | 22 March 2018 at 06:40 PM
TTG, Colonel,
Russian MI-8MTPR-1 helos equipped with the EW system Rychag-AV have surfaced in Syria.
Posted by: J | 23 March 2018 at 03:23 AM
TTG
Erdogan today - apparently Idlib is now on the agenda next, as well as Manbij.
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkey-will-not-stop-in-afrin-manbij-and-idlib-are-next-erdogan-129210
Posted by: Account Deleted | 23 March 2018 at 10:14 AM
The Turks,ie., regular forces and SF, will mostly pull out of former-Syria, but their 'FSA' badged militia will be given the ground as a permanent home in which to develop and defend a self sustaining pro-Turkish economy (since no one else will help them anymore). Erdogan will keep using this formula elsewhere until other Turk-led militia are given an unequivocal limit of advance by either Russia or the US, the former to protect SAG ground and the latter to protect US bases and interests in SDF-land. The point is that Erdogan will stop; he will not risk a single defeat since his personal brand is that of the strongman or perhaps as the Sultan of the modern era.
I can't see the US pulling out especially east of the Euphrates; they have bases there for a purpose and with the SDF-captured oil fields they may be getting close to a self sustaining structure. For the US, Iran and the Shia Salient are the objectives and Rojava and Jordan offer interesting possibilities.
Posted by: JW | 23 March 2018 at 12:46 PM
I am thinking that perhaps you was menat to place this response in the Afghanistan thread, since it is there where I commented about "misinterpretations of Islam".
When I talk about "misinterpretations of Islam" I am meaning mainly particular interpretations of sharia as those they do theTaliban by affirming, for example, that women must go out there with a jail called burka over them or women must not aquie knowledge. This is their particular interpretation based most probably in propaganda interiorized since childhood at madrassas especially conceibed to oposse the communist ideology of the USSR.
This is so since there is no where in the Quran where it is explicited that women must cover themselves in such a way, in any case that they must dress in a humble way, but this is really common to every of the religions of the book....Neither there is no where in the Quran where it is said that women must not aquire any knowledge at all and so must remain ignorant for their whole life...There you have that this is not so even in an Islamci Republic like Iran where women are offered the same opportunities to develop intelectually than men...
Related to hierarchy, it seems to me that Islam has also its religious hierarchy, as it has every religion of the book... What Islam has not, of course, is something like the Vatican ( especially not anything so luxury....), but they have also their Islamic Universities which function as reseracher, study and regulation centers of religious dogma, as could be Qom University for Shi´a Islam or Al Azhar University for Sunni Islam...For what it seems, is Shi´a Islam which keeps the simplest hierarchy...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_religious_leaders
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Azhar_University
Notice that neither of these both main branches of Islam accept wahabism as part of Umma, really their higuest scholars and authorities of both Shi´a and Sunni communities have no where to catch this let´s say "ideology" from...An "ideology" especificaly created for conquest through violence, terror and war to fulfill the goals of Western Imperialism...
Posted by: Sarah B | 23 March 2018 at 07:28 PM
Behold from the Syrian Observatory the speculation that Sohail Hassan could succeed Bashar. The problem is that any time his name is mentioned by the opposition or Western journalists, there are serious accusation of horrific human rights abuse. I have long speculated that this might be a good idea, but felt that his reputation might disqualify him. He certainly sounds like a good interlocutor for Putin, but stress that the big confrontations can be handled, so their military need not hang around, just reconstruction guys.
http://syrianobserver.com/EN/Features/34000/Will_Tiger_Succeed_Assad_President_Syria_Putin_Orders
Posted by: Annem | 23 March 2018 at 11:56 PM
Annem,
That article is originally from Al Rai. I would not be surprised if it was published to deliberately put Hassan's life in danger. It's setting Hassan up as a direct threat to the rule of Assad. If this idea takes off, Hassan will probably die in a tragic helicopter crash. He has taken promotions reluctantly. I don't think he has any desire to challenge Assad for the presidency.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 24 March 2018 at 12:19 AM
Wahabis, Taliban, Deobandis, neo-Salafis, and lately ISIS are an embarrasment to very many Muslims in that all of their practices are consistent with Islamic Tradition. That is the source of designation of them as mere "ideologies" - trying to obfuscate the fact that they are as much a Muslim as the next fellow.
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 24 March 2018 at 10:02 AM
Good clarification about al Rai...thanks. Nevertheless, Hassan may be in danger anyway, due to his status as a national hero and has the charisma that Bashar lacks. [Recall the couple of war heroes in Egypt that found themselves in early retirement. A Syrian leader would likely take a more definitive approach.]
I think a lot depends on the intel-security cluster within the military that make the big decisions. Don't know, of course, what Hassan's relationship with them is and their own individual ambitions but it is likely that having "one of their own" sitting at the top might be viewed as a good thing. Whether the regime puts in someone that outsiders and the opposition detest ever more than Bashar, he would be a new face. At the very least after all these decades, it will no longer be called the al-Assad regime. If there is any truth to the article, this does seem to be a better choice that Bashar or any of the civilians around him.
Do you know if he speaks Russia, English or any other foreign language?
Posted by: Annem | 24 March 2018 at 10:07 AM
Legitimate religious authority in the World of Islam currently exists only in the institution of the Kingship in Morocco and in the Office of Supreme Juris-consul in Iran.
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 24 March 2018 at 10:12 AM
TTG,
On the Turkish claim of no desire to remain.
Does it seem plausible that there is behind the scenes dissension within the ranks of Turkish leadership on this project? It doesn't seem to be working out nearly as easy as some of that leadership imagined at inception, and it seems highly likely they are also feeling some behind the scenes diplo push-back from a variety of sources, perhaps equally unimagined.
I see there are mixed messages coming from Turkey on this point.
Posted by: Mark Logan | 24 March 2018 at 03:07 PM