“The greatest achievement of human society and one of its rarest pleasures is conversation,” aid Jacque Barzun, an historian who taught at Columbia University when I was there.
Today, who believes such a statement to be true?
Is conversation today the greatest achievement of human society? Fat chance, as they used to say.
Over the holidays, my wife and I went to a small party at a friend’s house. We are very close to the family. One son is becoming a State Dept. intern in Croatia next year. I was eager to heart him out.
Instead, a mother and her daughter arrived late and the daughter, in her twenties, was eager to hold the floor. The daughter began by saying that she has a sister who moved from South Carolina to somewhere in North Carolina, and then she began a rambling dissertation about a railway line being developed here in N.C. where my wife and I live. One line was based in Durham, and it was going to run to the airport, but someone contradicted this, saying that it stopped short of the airport, and the daughter went on anyway. Then she began to talk about some housing program in the state, and there was nothing in what she said that was worth knowing. Clearly, she felt no mercy for her listeners.
Remember, as a member of the group, I did not want to stir up conflict; I only wanted to stir up interest. In any case, everyone was glassy-eyed when the daughter finished. It was clear we were dealing with a mind of dead sediment and what was needed was an energetic fish to suddenly stir up a momentary disturbance. Alas, there wasn’t one. The sediment soon just settled back to what it was, entirely dead.
In the car after we left, I was nettled. My wife said to me, “Look -- they were simply ordinary people talking about ordinary things. They have a right to do that.’ I countered by saying, “Fine. But I retain the right not to listen to them,” and quoted Walter Bagehot, the great 19th century critic who said that “ordinary people use what brains they have, but it usually doesn’t amount to much.”
There was another disheartening incident.
We recently hosted a small gathering where the women talked a lot about retail stores closing, women’s outfits, etc. To my relief, I found a man whose nephew who was studying in Estonia. He was studying at a university the name of which his uncle couldn’t recall. I told him that Putin was creating trouble in the Baltic States and Finland. According to news reports, NATO’s expansion into Poland and the Baltic countries, which I had devoutly opposed, had put Putin in a position where he felt he had to strike back and take Georgia and Ukraine. In any case, Putin wants to erode western support for the Baltic States who are under NATO’s protection.
My guest replied that Putin always causes trouble, and I waited, but that was the end of that. I sincerely wanted to learn more about his nephew’s studies, but he had nothing to add.
One woman suddenly announced she was going to reread all of John LeCarre’s books. I asked which of them was her favorite. Her face went blank. She knew The Spy Who came in from the Cold, but couldn’t remember any of the titles of the rest. After that, we had to listen to an endless discussion about whether or not it was good to use boiling water as opposed to warm water when you make tea. The decision was that boiling water acts to make the tea bitter so it’s better to use warm.
All of this was tittle-tattle. Such speakers don’t edit. They cannot determine the important from the subordinate, and they lack balance and taste. Nor so they have the talent to expand on their topics.
These people there were honest, good natured, hard-working, but intellectually toothless. No one learned anything from what was said; no one was stimulated or excited or made eager to learn more. The speakers were all satisfied with doing the dead-man’s float.
That’s our society today. Being with such people is intolerable because they are so boring. There was no continuous narrative, no interesting sequence of events or unexpected knowledge. There was no direction, no follow through, any point to it all. There is no much to learn about – think of the Roman Empire, or the Greeks or the Renaissance or the Romantics, but learning about them requires a lot of reading and study. Not only do we have to read, we must remember what we’ve read, reread it, memorize it, or otherwise, reading is simply a diversion, a waste of time.
Yet these days I go to social occasions with a sense of dread. Why do people get together except for the purpose of exchanging perceptions, concepts, history, abstractions, great works of thought and art, and other unchanging knowledge? Of course, there is always the warmth of the huddled herd, but I want to learn things from listening to a group. I don’t want to parade or flourish or grandstand or dominate. I simply want to listen in order to learn about things I don’t know in an effort to educate myself. I want to hear of people’s risks and adventures and their triumphant struggles as they share their lives.
Andover the holiday weekend, I had a reprieve. My wife went to a place after Christmas, only to find that the hosts were playing some sort of board game that consisted of ramming a piece of wood into other pierces of wood. It was very noisy, and my heart sank the minute I went in and sat down.
But as I was sitting there another man and his wife came in. She worked in Moscow for the State Department’s Bureau if Intelligence and Research. She knew her facts, and I suspected she worked for the CIA. Her husband was a former Foreign Service officer involved in arms control plus he had done a tour of duty in Pakistan. One host came in to try and urge us to play the board game, but the woman and her husband demurred. Instead, we talked about President Reagan’s build up of U.S. Navy shipping (in all its hyperbole,) the dire Soviet-U.S. tensions including the Soviet’s burning their documents in their London residence because they feared that war was imminent in 1982. (I think.) We discussed the Jerry Whitworth case, in which Whitworth, for money, provided intimate details of the movements of our attack submarines and the panic that this had caused in the U.S. intelligence community. We went for two hours. Every time the host interrupted, the husband would put up his hand, demurring, explaining that we were having a conversation.
What a wonderful stimulating, splendid evening!
But the dismal truth is that very few people can carry on a conversation.
A good conversation is a chance to share knowledge of life, of predicaments, crises, and interesting books and events. It stimulates, it doesn’t deaden. It welcomes and broadens, it doesn’t narrow. We old timers have had a lot happen to us, and its fun to share stories and episodes with others who have also led a rich life. But more and more we never run into people ho have been shot at, wounded, been bitter combat, jumped out of an airplane multiple times, endured death threats and other incidents that make life interesting. Pat has lived through a vast array of hazards, and in many cases barely escaped with his skin. But in any case, one talks not to boast or out-point someone else, but to have the pleasure of sharing memories of past experience. We look for people who are “many-sided” because we can still learn a lot from them.
But what audience today can bear to listen to anything but a chance remark? Every group I attend is very impatient with its members. I never begin any story that is longer than a brief paragraph. If I do, I instantly detect skepticism for anything longer, so I stay silent.
Such is life.
Now that is interesting Babak. Sadly I know little of that most ancient of religions - would you be able to recommend one or more books in order that I may remedy this situation?
Posted by: Account Deleted | 10 January 2018 at 03:11 PM
Reference #24
Smart phones are an abomination. How can you have any sort of conversation with someone when they are absorbed by that electronic monster in their hand?
Even a brother of mine, who built a fantastic home by hand and lived completely off the grid for years finally had power brought in, at a considerable expense, and now raves about smart phones being the greatest technological advance of the century.
That's our century, since he's somewhat younger than me, but was still born not long after WWII.
Posted by: John Minnerath | 10 January 2018 at 03:16 PM
I totally understand where the author comes from, and I mean totally. But I, personally, while sharing the sentiment somewhat, would rather live among down to earth simple but good-natured, decent people than socialize with highly sophisticated a-holes, probability of encountering which grows with the number (and "quality") of degrees they have. Sometimes complexity of the thought process easily transforms into sophisticated excuses for being a jerk. This is not to say that there are no a-holes among rednecks, quite a few, actually. But I love also:"the warmth of the huddled herd". This is very important part of our life.
Posted by: SmoothieX12 | 10 January 2018 at 03:38 PM
Not me.
Posted by: Walker | 10 January 2018 at 03:38 PM
https://www.amazon.com/Teachings-Magi-R-C-Zaehner/dp/0195198573
and
https://www.amazon.com/When-Zarathustra-Spoke-Reformation-Bibliotheca/dp/1568591845/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1515620369&sr=1-1&keywords=when+zarathustra+spoke
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 10 January 2018 at 04:39 PM
Many thanks Babak
Posted by: Account Deleted | 10 January 2018 at 05:06 PM
Oilman2,
I hear you and sympathize.
Since retiring we returned to our family ranch. Now my circle are other farmers, vets, winemakers, distillers, brewers, cheesemakers, and a motley crew of other retirees including artists, writers and executives who have "escaped" to wine country. Our conversations are about composting, crop rotation, pruning techniques, permaculture, fermenting and other assorted topics. I find them very interesting as I always learn something useful. I also have another circle who I hang out with at our local watering holes. They are mostly Deplorables, who I find refreshing as they have a lot of common sense and an unpretentious attitude. The next generation who I worked with in my professional life write and call me regularly with "Jack, did you know...". They keep me abreast on the world of finance. What I no longer have the time for are the sophistry of the so-called elites. The common political thread I hear among those I interact with regularly in our small community is a desire for a smaller government that spends less and interferes less in our lives.
When I need the intellectual stimulation and analysis of world affairs I come to SST. At this late stage of my life, I am grateful for the land and the beauty of America, warts and all. I am hopeful that my grandchildren and their children will guide America to its new place in the world. I know my generation let down our forefathers.
Posted by: Jack | 10 January 2018 at 06:00 PM
"I think we can agree, on empirical grounds, that most people are not interested in learning."
Yeah. Learning makes you uncomfortable and who wants to be that?
Posted by: Patrick Armstrong | 10 January 2018 at 09:08 PM
I don't attend many social gatherings and don't have a spouse to share afterthoughts with, but I am lucky to live in an area where there are lots of interesting people of many backgrounds with whom I share many delightful conversations. I love having friends of all ages and have easily been spared the company of those who spend their time buried in their cell phones. I too think that travel outside the US is more important for Americans than others since we can go thru life that is very narrow unlike almost all other countries where a broader prospective is pretty necessary. This is not to say that I have no experience with the sort of gatherings you talk about, but I manage to find many occasions for interesting conversation.
Posted by: Linda | 10 January 2018 at 10:14 PM
Or an Englishman. Or French. Or Italian. Or...
Posted by: wtofd | 10 January 2018 at 10:15 PM
The most interesting conversation I can recall about Zoroastrianism
was with an older oriental rug dealer. I asked him to tell me about the
carpets that had an abundance of pink in the threads.
And then there have been conversations by guests from various parts of Persia &/or Afghanistan that seemed amused that I enjoy keeping a live flame burning in the house unless it's very hot outside...something about the flame gets them going on about Zoroastrianism & the pre-Islamic world.
So called conversations with many Americans unfortunately start off with
mini interrogations like, "What do you do?", trying to catch the exact spelling of my name to google me, etc...total turn-offs. I'm very sympathetic to many of the comments on this thread...then there's p.c.
the true killer of many interesting conversations. I can't recall an
interesting dinner conversation in over 20 years, perhaps longer. The best exchanges at social events are usually outside where a few smokers congregate until the anti-smokers show up to cough & bring it all to an end.
Posted by: elaine | 11 January 2018 at 12:51 AM
"One seeks a midwife for his thoughts; another, someone to whom he can be a midwife. Thus originates a good conversation."
Posted by: Virginia Slim | 11 January 2018 at 06:41 AM
"They keep me dear in the Mage House,
For the everlasting Fire burns in our Heart"
- Hafiz
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 11 January 2018 at 09:42 AM
Your description of the daughter going on and on reminds me of an smart phone addicted niece of mine.
I was a bit puzzled by the setting admittedly. I get it that the daughter seems to be excited, talks and talks. But what caused the delay to start with? Supposing the "small party" is a couple with their kids, one daughter absent, plus Richard and his wife. Were father and son present before the arrival? Was there no chance to talk to father and son? Shift the conversation to give either one a chance?
Remember, as a member of the group, I did not want to stir up conflict; I only wanted to stir up interest.
So, one daughter is absent, does she miss her? Will she miss her brother next year. Will she visit him in Croatia?
Some people talk a lot, not since they have to always take center stage, but since they try to hide a basic insecurity in whatever context.
I wondered about that, admittedly:
In any case, everyone was glassy-eyed when the daughter finished.
And then it was time to leave?
Posted by: LeaNder | 11 January 2018 at 09:51 AM
Davis @ #18
No not everyone here knows the punchline. Or is that in itself the joke?
Posted by: ex-PFC Chuck | 11 January 2018 at 12:37 PM
Bruce Cockburn (Canadian musician/songwriter) has a line, 'The trouble with normal is it always gets worse.'
Posted by: Down_in_Front | 11 January 2018 at 09:44 PM
I am socially inept, so I do not understand the picture presented. Was this a party, or a lecture? Or a twelve-step group meeting? When I have gone to people's homes there was not one person speaking while all others sat silently and listened. There were multiple conversations going on in different parts of the room, or different rooms of the house. If Mr. Sale wanted to ask the young man about his experiences so far with the State Department, why didn't he just go talk to him? I'm a member of a twelve-step group, and I know the format there is for everybody to sit quietly until the current speaker is done, but before and after the meeting there are usually several separate conversations outside the meeting place. I don't get it (I also didn't go below the fold, the first part of the story was too unsettling).
Posted by: Procopius | 12 January 2018 at 09:05 AM
James
You know nothing about me yet you label me as smug. I admire your certainty.
Richard Sale
Posted by: richard sale | 12 January 2018 at 11:33 AM
Mr Sale,
Spot on, more's the pity, though things do get livelier when one meets a fellow deplorable. Just one minor point. I'm worried about this bit:-
"After that, we had to listen to an endless discussion about whether or not it was good to use boiling water as opposed to warm water when you make tea. The decision was that boiling water acts to make the tea bitter so it’s better to use warm."
I'd like to have been there. I might have swung the meeting in favour of orthodoxy. Sounds as if you have some friends who need help. Lots of help. Water off the boil, as I remind my German pals now and again, is barbaric. (Not all my German pals. There are some of the true faith over there.) Mind you, I read that way back some Americans attempted to make tea with cold salt water. Caused quite a lot of fuss and must have tasted awful. Glad to hear you've at least graduated to warm tap water.
So in fact that conversation could have opened up into a most interesting discussion on whether those rascals in Boston were freedom fighters or just worried about defending market share. And on to how those fifty aristocrats in a barn came up with a Constitution that at present seems (in spite of my fiercely insular prejudices) as if it might deliver more promising results than ours.
Yes, I'd like to have been there. Nihil humani a me alienum puto, even tea. Especially tea, really, if you have countrymen who deviate so far from the paths of righteousness as to embrace the heresy of warm water.
Posted by: English Outsider | 13 January 2018 at 02:42 PM
English Outsider:
Concerning tea and water temperature. Seems with green tea (supposedly more healthy) there is this issue/discussion if the water should not be quite at boiling temperature. Admittedly in GB I may have not been too close enough to the P.O.S.H. society to see or witness the better tea culture. What's your approach to tea? The teabag?
Anyway: I am a bit impatient, beyond not really having a thermometer around. Thus yes, I don't pay attention.
The best green tea, I ever had, was a good-buy present from Japanese business visitors taking over a part of the firm I was working for. Ultimately outsourced to China? No more problems with color issues once imported back? Whole leaves. If I would try to get it regularly around here, only checked a place close to here that closed down, it would be so hellishly expensive that I can assure you I would pay attention to the temperature, since the expense for the thermometer would be a minor issue.
But yes, more generally the Japanese tea ceremony is quite fascinating.
Posted by: LeaNder | 14 January 2018 at 08:50 AM
Sehnsucht
Although there always has been a yearning for a past that is no more, IMO this time alas it is probably true.
A friend of mine used to say: "The television is on and the brains are off" There is more than a little truth in it. Today we live in a visual age where television, internet, tablets and smart phones are the main information carriers used.
Visual information is easy and doesn't cost a lot of energy. Reading is much harder and forces someone to create his own images. IMO this is the best way. It also helps to create a focus and develop your own creativity. It requires an active interaction with the written word. Visual information is passive.
Visual information is often superficial and not able to transmit or explain complex abstract ideas. For example I have only one example (and alas I don't remember which one) where the film was better than the book.
Posted by: Adrestia | 14 January 2018 at 09:38 AM
LeaNder - teabags? TEABAGS??? And on the Colonel's site.
I knew some of your compatriots who travelled to Ceylon and saw what was used for teabags. They reported back. I'm not saying the road outside was swept as well but none of them have used those vile artefacts since.
However. No consideration has as yet been given to the all-important question of site tea. Thermos or brew-up in situ? Greater minds than ours have addressed the question but it is still unresolved. The very greatest minds I remember seeing in action once. It made an indelible impression. I came on site early just as the men were setting up. It was a small job, lasting only a week or so. A neighbour poked her head out of the window to see what was going on. To be greeted by a cheery summons "Bacon sandwich and tea around eleven, luv." And there was. Every day, apparently, and for the entire team. Did they know the lady in question, I enquired later. Never met her before, they said, won't meet her again, but she got the bacon just right. Makes you feel humble, doesn't it, to think of that level of virtuosity.
Back to life as we ordinary mortals know it. Assam Royale makes a tolerable brew over your way. It needs time. Give it lots. The Frisians are of course our first cousins in this as in so many other things and make tea impeccably. Give Ostfriesen Teemischung a whirl. If in England a good solid tea is Yorkshire Red Label. It's one of the few English everyday teas that the accountants haven't reduced the quality of in the hope we won't notice.
That tapping noise, by the way, is Mr Sale's foot. We'd better leave the question of milk first or not, and I think we'd better skip the question of the correct preparation of Green Tea altogether. Pity. So little said, so much to say. Another thing Mr Rhodes got right - I think I remember this quote accurately as well - was that when it comes to making tea the English have won first prize in the lottery of life. Don't be jealous. When it comes to coffee the first prize is undoubtedly yours.
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Cecil_Rhodes
One of our own neocons. I go with the Mark Twain quote at the bottom.
Posted by: English Outsider | 14 January 2018 at 04:42 PM
thanks EO. Love it when "luv" surfaces somewhere. Feels a bit home. :)
Posted by: LeaNder | 15 January 2018 at 08:22 AM
Visual information is easy and doesn't cost a lot of energy. Reading is much harder and forces someone to create his own images.
I somewhat disagree, Adrestia. Visual information is much more complex then text. But yes, I come from the arts in this context ... How do you read and interpret visual non-verbal signals around you in everyday life? To what extend may sound and vision (...) matter in a soldiers life, acknowledging a share of SST members here?
More randomly, do you reflect on how your brain deals with a photo heading or accompanying the article you are reading the same way you may or may not question the headline or more generally the news header's special (most important?) news value selections?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_values
*******
A friend of mine used to say: "The television is on and the brains are off"
Do you recall the context/central theme of the exchange? Was s/he referring to news? Entertainment and/as news or film? Straight forward news reporting have a standard set of stereotypical images underlying the reports. ...
Posted by: LeaNder | 16 January 2018 at 09:13 AM
LeaNder
"To what extend may sound and vision (...) matter in a soldiers life, acknowledging a share of SST members here?" I suppose this is a re-statement of your basic belief tat soldiers are rather limited people. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 16 January 2018 at 09:42 AM