« Three boosters will return? | Main | Trump Pressures Islamabad - TTG »

07 January 2018

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

blue peacock

Col. Lang

It will be useful to know which officials in DC the leadership of the "unicorn army in Syria" met.

Are there slush funds floating around in various budgets to finance this unicorn army?

Willybilly

Truly laughable if it weren’t tragic.... As if not enough blood and refugees have been spilled and splashed across continents!

Degringolade

Colonel:

Is there really still a faction of the Borg (foreign policy establishment) who want to continue to back the unicorns against Russian efforts toward reconciliation in Syria and against our SDF/YPG allies? Really?

Yes! really!

It really doesn't make a lick of sense to me either.

plantman

The situation is even more complicated then stated here. An article in Sputnik today says that the plan to create a de facto Kurdistan is presently underway and has Uncle Sam's blessing:

"Washington is planning 'concrete steps' toward providing a Syrian Democratic Forces-controlled area in northern Syria's eastern Euphrates area three times the size of Lebanon with diplomatic recognition, a leading Arabic international newspaper has reported.

The 28,000 square km territory, controlled by the Syrian Democratic Forces, a collection of predominantly Kurdish militias including the YPG People's Protection Units, took its first step toward US recognition after US Defense Secretary Jim Mattis promised to send US diplomats to SDF-controlled areas to work alongside US troops operating in the region, the official said."

I find this very confusing. Why would the Trump administration want to enrage Turkey that plays a more important role in its regional plans than the Kurds?

If Erdogan flips into Putin's camp, then what? Then the two landbridges into central asia Ukraine and Turkey) will be a problem.

Setting up shop in East Syria just doesn't make sense.

Charles Michael

For what it's worth,
I read in one of the usual sources (AM, SF,MO commentary ?)that Erdogan was backing the FSA, encouraging them to take on the SDF.
It could relate to the last derviche spin in Tunisia against Bachar Al Hassad.
IMO if coming from US and Erdogan it is all about getting leverage and/or future destabilizing means if opportunities arouse.

JohnsonR

Pretty clearly, the anti-Iranian factions around your Borg are still invested in undermining peace in Syria, for the purpose of weakening Iran.

And it seems the FSA visitors, like most such supplicants in favour with the US foreign policy establishment or its manipulators, are well aware of the correct current buttons to push in Washington ("the FSA is ready to fight Iran in Syria with support from the USA"), no doubt having been carefully briefed by their US sponsors.

I wonder who made the reported recent attack on Khmeimim such a seeming success, and to what purpose?

james

your title sounds about right... anything to generate more war, so as to explain a rationale for why the usa is even in syria... optics being everything and you don't want to piss off ksa or israel by appearing to leave syria with your tail between your legs.. maybe they met with that sterling usa politican mccain? someone with some bona-fide cred, lol..

EEngineer

closing italics

Account Deleted

That report on US recognition of Kurdish-controlled territory was this one I believe, also referred to by one of the people commenting on the SF article the Colonel provides a link to. The source is an (unnamed) "senior Western official".

https://aawsat.com/english/home/article/1135936/us-moves-closer-diplomatic-recognition-sdf-areas-syria

ISL

Dear Colonel,

My guess is that sooner rather than later, our stay in Iraq is going to overdone and the US will be shown the Iraqi door (again). The Iraqi kurdish regions have folded to Baghdad, so they are no longer a fall back position, and some portion of the BORG has ideas of falling back to Syrian Kurdish territory.

IMO its amazingly shortsighted - first off the R+6 and Turkey surround the area and can make it untenable, and secondly, since the Kurds live there and the US does not, they will have to deal with their neighbors long term, and hence I have confidence they will sell the US short and get the best deal they can from Syria in terms of autonomy.

I think this refers to the delusional world of the Borg who think reality occurs because they pronounce - whereas R+6 have created facts on the ground (not the idiocy of alternate facts).

Peter AU

Mu’tasim Brigade is based at the town of Mare, northern Aleppo, according to wikipedia.
This is the area where there has been a reasonable amount of fighting over the last year between Erdogan's rebels and the Kurds.

Richardstevenhack

Needs to be reiterated here not to use highlighting HTML such as italics...

As for the unicorns, presumably there are US factions who would like them to continue to cause chaos in Syria, whether against Iran or the Kurds doesn't matter as long as it continues to destabilize the country.

The bottom line of all this has been to find some way somehow to justify a US/NATO military attack on Syria. That is the one consistent theme since the conflict began, and it's entirely based on the Libya experience. Libya was either a dry run or the inspiration for the Syria operation.

Stepping back, there is no particular reason for the US not to continue this policy. Sure, it failed miserably due to Russia's intervention. But what did that really cost the US or Israel or Saudi Arabia? Did anyone get fired? Did anyone spend any of their own money over Syria (maybe Saudi Arabia - the US and Israel only spent taxpayer money, so who cares?)

So continuing to "meddle" with an eye towards somehow figuring out a way to still get their desired end result - a crippled Syrian military that can't be an effective actor against Israel in a war with Iran - is obviously a logical course for the warmongers in DC and Israel and Riyadh.

It ain't over until the fat guys in DC, Israel and Saudi Arabia have sung - and they haven't stopped singing.

Anonymous

Okay, I'll try to close the italics from comment 3 .
Did it work?

ree

Erdogan doesn't even squeak when Russia throw press conferences with YPG Kurds yet every US analyst worries about "losing Turkey". Turkey ain't going nowhere - US needs to learn from Putin and use the only language Erdogan understands.

GeneO

The US supported Liwa al-Mutasim back 18 months ago when they were actively fighting against ISIS in northern Aleppo, within what is now Turkey's Euphrates Shield enclave. Not since AFAIK.

al-Mutasim was also being actively courted by the Russians at that time. They met in Northern Aleppo in Marea Town I guess they got disillusioned when the Russians later sent peacekeepers to stop them from attacking Kurds in Afrin Canton.

As for who in the borg foreign policy establishment is talking to them now. Maybe some in the Jamestown Foundation? They have talked with them previously.

rjj

does this work?


confusedponderer

Close italics ...

confusedponderer

Richardstevenhack,
Needs to be reiterated here not to use highlighting HTML such as italics..

The very unsecret secret here is that if one uses such code he has, for example, to close with < / i > what he opens with < i >. If left 'unclosed' the opening is being continued forever on the page.

Likely the cause is a typo. The solution is practice and practice and practice, and making a post preview.

Anna

Another piece of a Middle East zioconized puzzle: "Both the U.S. and Israel have close ties to al-Nusra Front in Syria. The U.S., for its part, funneled weapons to al-Nusra by continuing weapons shipments to Syrian opposition groups in Idlib even as they declared allegiance to al-Nusra en masse, and even took al-Nusra Front off the terror watch list after it changed its name. An al-Nusra Front commander also infamously claimed in 2016 that “the Americans are on our side.” Meanwhile, Israel’s long-standing commitment to aiding and funding the terrorist group, while also treating their wounded, has been an open secret for years. In addition, the terrorist group Mujahideen-e-Khalq, popularly known as MEK in the West, has been active in the current protests [in Iran] as well. Despite its record of killing innocent civilians, Western media has cited MEK spokespeople and members in its reporting on the protests as “proof” that the Iranian people are calling for regime change, while ignoring the massive pro-government rallies that have coincided with the protests. Little mention has been made of the fact the MEK fighters have been trained by the U.S. military in the past and share connections with Israeli Mossad." https://www.globalresearch.ca/birth-of-an-insurgency-the-us-israeli-secret-deal-to-manipulate-protests-in-iran/5625012
Who have been training the Wahhabists?

turcopolier

All

when one of you screws up on italics, etc. just tell me what comment it is in and i will edit it out as I did in this case. pl

LeaNder

It could relate to the last derviche spin in Tunisia against Bachar Al Hassad.

Charles,
derviche spin? Tunisia? There may be something lost in between the lines for me. Tunesia indirectly stated the Arab Spring? That's a myth? I may get that wrong. Mohamed Bouazizi comes to mind.

Haven't really looked at Tunisia lately, and may have missed recent news/developments you may have in mind.

LeaNder

sorry, Charles Michael, my mind was preoccupied:
correction:

Tunesia indirectly started the Arab Spring?

It looked as if that may have been the case.

LeaNder

leave syria with your tail between your legs.

Well, for what it's worth, and strictly I have to defend my image of top-babbler on SST, meaning you don't have to pay attention, james:

Trump promised to take care that the US army wins again. As it deserves. ...

Richardstevenhack

Personally I don't see the point of using any highlighting. Most of what's published here can be emphasized in other ways without risking the site's software or the author messing up the HTML.

Since it's a consistent problem, I say ban it.

A.Pols

"Sejeri also revealed that fighting “the Iranian influence in Syria” was the main topic during the meeting between the two sides. The Mu’tasim Brigade official also stressed that the FSA is ready to fight Iran in Syria with support from the USA."

And, do you suppose this quote explains so much of our schizoid and seemingly self defeating behavior vis-a-vis Syria? Sort of like "Charlie Wilson's War" in that it seems like such a good idea to enable an ideological enemy so he'll fight one of our designated rivals? These things always seem to blow up in our faces.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

April 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    
Blog powered by Typepad