Overall things are going quite well for the R+6. Although the IS and other jihadi forces are still capable of staging limited tactical offensive operations, any gains they make are short lived.
In southwest Raqqa governorate, General Suheil al-Hassan has stated that his Tiger Forces will be in Deir Ezzor by the beginning of September. They are battling for several towns along the Euphrates along with local tribal forces and are aiming to soon take Ma’adan. A few days ago IS launched a counterattack in this area preceded by ten plus VBIED attacks. Suheil and his allies suffered close to forty dead and fifty wounded, but by the end of the day they retook what little ground they lost and continued the advance. A Tiger Force commander described Jihadi losses thusly, “ISIS losses are folds of ours.”
This Tiger Force offensive is also widening the front away from the Euphrates and now occupies a growing section of the Raqqa-Deir Ezzor border. They are poised to attack at both Ma’adan and at the critical road junction in the Bishri Triangle.
Further west a new R+6 offensive is taking place south of Ithriyah. The Cheetah Group of the Tiger Forces has been redeployed from the southeast Raqqa front to serve as the core of this new offensive along with Liwaa Al-Quds, Qalamoun Shield, the 11th Tank Division and elements of the NDF and SSNP. The goal of this offensive is to drive south towards Suknah to isolate the jihadis entrenched in the Uqayribat region in eastern Hama. These jihadists are at the western end of a large bulge in central Syria aimed at Homs and Hama. A quick glance at the above map shows the significance of this bulge. The R+6 has also launched an offensive from Salamiyah towards Uqayribat.
I assess the plan is to reduce the Uqayribat bulge before the Tiger Forces offensive from southwest Raqqa drives to Deir Ezzor. The dual offensive drives into the bulge will either force the jihadis to die in place, pull back towards the Euphrates or be fixed in place to the point they are incapable of any offensive action. The southwest Raqqa offensive will simultaneously take Ma’adan and the Bishri Triangle. They will then be in position to launch a wide offensive from Ma’adan to Deir Ezzor and from the Bishri Triangle to Ash Sholah and on to Deir Ezzor once the Uqayribat bulge is addressed.
R+6 forces are also at the gates of Suknah with every intention of taking it soon. Once Suknah falls, there is nothing but open desert between the R+6 forces and Deir Ezzor. However, the jihadis know this as well. My guess is that they have prepared some kind of defensive lines between Suknah and Deir Ezzor.
The defenders of Deir Ezzor itself have received some relief. Reinforcements and supplies have been flown in from Qamishli. General Zahreddine also noted that some jihadis have pulled out to reinforce their defenses against the Tigers from the north. This has allowed the Deir Ezzor defenders to undertake their own offensive actions. Using a jihadi tactic, they dug a tunnel, mined it and blew up one of the jihadi supply lines into the cemetery area. Zahreddine himself led elements of the 104th Airborne Brigade in a successful immediate assault on the area. He’s one bad mamma jamma.
In the south, SAA and Hezbollah units along with their foreign militia allies are still aiming for T2 and Bukamal. A night laager near T2 suffered casualties and lost a tank last week from a surprise night attack from the jihadis. As beleagered as they are, IS can still bite.
In Al-Tanf, the US is preparing to abandon their positions. They have called for their “moderate jihadists” to turn in their heavy weapons. Without this support, two jihadist groups have already switched to the SAA side. Without US and Jordanian support, the rest of these groups will not last long.
In the southwest corner of Syria in the declared truce zone, Russia has deployed 400 troops as peacekeepers in the Dara’a and Quneitra governates. It is not clear if these are newly deployed military police or elements of the previously deployed 31st Guards Air Assault Brigade, a unit specially trained in peacekeeping operations. Whoever they are, I don’t think it is an accident that they will be deployed the Golan Heights.
Moving further north to the Syrian-Lebanese border, Hezbollah and the Lebanese Army have just completed a week long operation to capture Arsal and defeat the Ha’yat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) jihadis. Most of those jihadis, around 9,000 including families, will be bussed up to Idlib where they can go fight their fellow jihadis for now.
Of special note is an operation to be carried out by the Lebanese Army in this same area, Ras Balbaak, to rid the Lebanese border region of IS jihadis. I do not know how much assistance Hezbollah will provide to their Lebanese brethren. This will be a serious test for the Lebanese Army.
There is more going on militarily in Syria, but this is all I’ll cover this time. But just as important is the political success of the R+6. Russia, Syria and Jordan have been in negotiations for a long time to end Coalition support of jihadis along the Syrian-Jordanian border and establish a ceasefire. This has been accomplished with dramatic results. I think the presence of the 31st Guards Air Assault Brigade in this area gave pause to Amman. The Americans are part of this ceasefire, but I think they just went along with the inevitability of the developing R+6-Jordanian detente. This leaves the Israelis with a puzzlement.
The Russian-Turkish relationship deserves a posting of its own. All I will say now is that I have a feeling Russia is in the process of taming Turkey. They can still be bit, but the domestication process is underway. Time will tell.
TTG
TTG -
Your graphic #6 is a doctored copy. The original photo shown on 30 June by Hammurabi Justice twitter account shows that technical next to the US vehicle as being manned by fighters from 'Maghawir al-Thawra'. That group, or many of them, defected to the SAA just within the last few days.
http://syria.liveuamap.com/en/2017/1-august-a-second-group-of-usbacked-maghaweer-althawra-fighters
No way I would believe that US troops are providing support and backup for al Quaida.
Posted by: mike | 02 August 2017 at 01:09 AM
mike,
I never thought it was actual Al Qaeda. I figured someone was just taking the "a jihadi is a jihadi" idea to it's logical, and perhaps extreme, conclusion. Maghawir al-Thawra makes perfect sense.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 02 August 2017 at 01:30 AM
TTG, Sir
Thank you for this excellent comprehensive report on the war in Syria. I really look forward to your military analysis of the Syrian war..
It seems the R+6 are slowly grinding their way through the eastern desert. Unlike a more traditional army it seems that ISIS forces don't surrender. They fight until they're killed. What tactics can R+6 deploy to mitigate the loss of life by VBIEDs?
On the other hand the AQ jihadis seem to work out a deal to head to Idlib. Two questions: Why aren't the AQ jihadis not creating another battle front to ease the pressure on ISIS forces in the eastern desert? Is the battle of Idlib gonna be the most nasty battle in this long war?
Posted by: Jack | 02 August 2017 at 01:31 AM
Most jihadi groups in Syria have fought alongside of and aided AQ even though they have not sworn allegiance to AQ. It is some time since I read the UN AQ designated terrorist list, but there is a good section in it about those who aid designated terrorist organisations and individuals.
In Syria the US has been aiding those who are aiding al Qaeda.
Posted by: Peter AU | 02 August 2017 at 02:19 AM
Thanks TTG for the overview.
Word is that Tanf will now be closed down. The U.S. claimed that the rebel forces there declined to fight only ISIS and wanted to continue to fight the government. That was a lie. Those forced did not agree to be flown to Shadadi in the north-east to fight under Kurdish command. They now joined the government.
The U.S. plans seems to be to build a force in Shadadi to race the Syrian army in an assault on Mayadin at the Euphrates. This move would capture some significant north-eastern oil resources still in the hand of ISIS. Very significant amounts U.S. equipment keeps flowing into the north eastern area. To preempt that Syria will probably need help from Iraq.
Posted by: b | 02 August 2017 at 04:23 AM
ZH claims that the President pulled support for anti-Assad rebels in the South after finding out they had been committing Jihadi-style atrocities. Bit late in the day to find that out, I'd have thought, but if this claim is true does it indicate the the President has not been getting accurate information from his staff?
Posted by: English Outsider | 02 August 2017 at 07:32 AM
Jack,
The Tiger Forces developed tactics to specifically deal with those tactics employed by the IS fighters including the use of VBIEDs, ATGMs and such. The Tigers organized special teams to spot and deal with these threats. I remember reading an article describing this months ago and found it again fairly easily.
https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/tiger-forces-became-effective-fighting-force-syria/
The various jihadis in Idlib seem to be too busy fighting among themselves at the moment. I think this was the R+6 plan all along. During the last war game I suggested that spetsnaz teams be used to conduct sabotage and assassinations in order to encourage this infighting. Perhaps the R+6 is doing this.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 02 August 2017 at 09:21 AM
TTG: Fascinating analysis as usual.
I literally returned from Turkey and Jordan this week. From speaking to some locals, I got the real sense that they are fatigued. Basically, neither Turks nor Jordanians want to fight to advance the interests of SA/Israel/USA against "the Iranians."
Of some local note, parts of Jordan experienced unrest following the conviction of the Jordanian soldier who shot the 3 GB's. Smart decision to release the video. Lots of fake stories were circulating. The video clarified the matter.
Posted by: Matthew | 02 August 2017 at 09:51 AM
TTG,
An interesting possibility with Idlib province. I don't think that in the long term ISIS will self destruct there. From the map it is very visible as a malignancy that needs to be excised.
Posted by: Fred | 02 August 2017 at 10:14 AM
TTG -
Although the other FSA group near al Tanf, Shuhada al-Qaryatayn, has refused to stop fighting against Assad. Their spokesman claims the US threatened to bomb our HQ after they attacked the government at al-Ghorab and al-Halba. They have refused to return arms to the Coalition "and will continue to use them against the Syrian regime".
Posted by: mike | 02 August 2017 at 10:26 AM
Peter -
CIA stupidity in backing weak sisters who could not stand up against Nusra et al.
Posted by: mike | 02 August 2017 at 10:29 AM
Suheil al Hassan for President?
Posted by: mike | 02 August 2017 at 10:40 AM
mike
Talk like that is apt to get him killed or exiled. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 02 August 2017 at 10:59 AM
TTG,
Very much enjoy your periodic war
reports.
I think when future military analysts
and historians write about this war in
Syria that they are going to write a lot
about the "Reconciliation Operations" and
how they were an integral part of the SAA
strategy.
Nightsticker
USMC 65-72
FBI 72-96
Posted by: Nightsticker | 02 August 2017 at 11:32 AM
With due respect, I doubt it is necessary.
Russian Experience in Chechnya and other Areas is that these type Groups turn on each other by their own Internal Forces as it is, no need to risk People generally speaking. (It could happen certainly but not necessarily Important)
Certainly throwing the different Contingents into the same Pot and leaving them to fight each other can be considered a Planned Idea but it requires no real Special Missions to ferment.
As to dealing with ISIS SVBIED, importance is visibility, a problem is to what I understand (I only did Reservist Training!) many ATGM are not built to necessarily match the movement/speed of many Cars when they go somewhat 'Zigzag'....
I do not know about other Audiences, but for Russians many of us we saw Video - Syrian Troops, Tanks etc running as SVBIED attacked, and a lone Russian Soldier with Rifle shooting back before Impact...
I do not mean it to condemn these Men, but as to mean Motivations obviously differ
Posted by: Grazhdanochka | 02 August 2017 at 12:25 PM
TTG, Sir
What do you think about suicide attacks and soldiers committed to die as military tactics? I recall reading about the Japanese kamikaze pilots but that was when the Japanese military was already falling apart.
Is the ideological commitment so strong that soldiers are willing to fight to their death? How does such a force get replenished? It would seem this is a wasteful expenditure of highly trained and motivated manpower.
I read that as ISIS is retreating from the western Euphrates villages they leave behind 20+ fighters whose sole purpose is to exact maximum damage to the SAA forces and die in the process.
Posted by: Jack | 02 August 2017 at 12:49 PM
Jack,
It would not be uncommon for soldiers to be willing to face extreme risks of death to fulfill their duty. This is different from deliberately sacrificing oneself to fulfill a mission, but only slightly. It's what soldiers do in time of war... not all soldiers, but enough. I find this normal. I was comfortable with the possibility that I could have died young leaving my young sons without a father. I could not bear living to a ripe old age with my sons bearing the burden and ignominy of knowing their father was a coward. That's the way I was raised. Addressing this question fully would require far more than this comment.
For those 20+ IS fighters left to fight to the death in those Euphrates villages, it sounds like a DLIC mission (detachment left in contact). Just a bit more intense than most.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 02 August 2017 at 02:03 PM
The ziocons are in charge:
"Sanctions are imposed against Russian financial institutions and their employees who interact with Syrian President Bashar Assad. The assets of such individuals will be frozen, the current US visas canceled, and entry into the US is forbidden." http://www.fort-russ.com/2017/08/trump-signs-anti-russian-sanctions-bill.html
A sovereign Syria is anathema for Israel. The Israel-firsters would better murder each and every child in Syria (with the US weaponry in the ISIS/Al Qaeda hands) than part with the Golan Heights.
Posted by: Anna | 02 August 2017 at 03:48 PM
Unless there's a tacit agreement among the big powers to divvy up Syria, I don't think Russia would let that stand.
Posted by: DH | 02 August 2017 at 04:15 PM
"What do you think about suicide attacks and soldiers committed to die as military tactics?"
I think this is going to become moot very rapidly. The VBIED's are either very smart or very stupid drones depending on your point of view. Retrofitting obsolete tanks with very elementary remote controlled autopilot would probably be the way to go.
Posted by: Bill Herschel | 02 August 2017 at 05:30 PM
It will be interesting to read Col. Lang's thoughts on this:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/ezra-cohen-watnick-fired-national-security-council
Posted by: dilbert dogbert | 02 August 2017 at 07:06 PM
Iranian sites report first buildings in al Suknneh (I think it means settlement) has been taken by SAA
Posted by: Kooshy | 02 August 2017 at 09:17 PM
Fars news quoting the MI6 propaganda shop the 0bservatory for HR says SAA now has freed 20% od Al Suknnh
Posted by: Kooshy | 02 August 2017 at 09:59 PM
Fisk's "sitrep" on infighting amongst the jihadis and potential fallout for the Kurds:
https://www.counterpunch.org/2017/08/02/when-syrian-war-ends-woe-to-the-kurds/
Posted by: Cortes | 02 August 2017 at 10:02 PM
The short answer is no, the President does not receive accurate information. This is an essential part of the problem: the staff have been hand-picked and placed precisely for their subservience to neo-con world views.
This issue came to a head with Chas Freeman: was the right man going to get the job daily briefing the (past) President, or the neo-con plant?
In many ways, this IS the battle, how to place people in State, Treasury, Justice, the White House, who are open to social/political alternatives and not beholden to the usual AIPAC crowd, and to have enough of such employees that they can grow into their more senior positions.
This situation did not happen overnight.
Posted by: Castellio | 02 August 2017 at 10:03 PM