COMMENT FROM PUBLIUS--HERE IS THE LATEST FROM PROFESSOR THEODORE POSTOL. HE IS RELENTLESS.
The Nerve Agent Attack that Did Not Occur: Analysis of the Times and Locations of Critical Events in the Alleged Nerve Agent Attack
at 7 AM on April 4, 2017 in Khan Sheikhoun, Syria
Summary of Findings
This analysis contains a detailed description of the times and locations of critical events in the alleged nerve agent attack of April 4, 2017 in Khan Shaykhun, Syria – assuming that the White House Intelligence Report (WHR) issued on April 11, 2017 correctly identified the alleged sarin release site.
Analysis using weather data from the time of the attack shows that a small hamlet about 300 m to the east southeast of the crater could be the only location affected by the alleged nerve agent release. Video data of suffocating and dead victims lying on the ground shows a different location from the predicted sarin dispersal site if it had been correctly identified by the White House.
The conclusion is that the nerve agent attack described in the White House Intelligence Report did not occur as claimed. There may well have been mass casualties from some kind of poisoning event, but that event was not the one described by the WHR.
The findings of this expanded analysis can serve two important purposes:
- It shows exactly what needs to be determined in an international investigation of this alleged atrocity.
In particular, if an international investigation can determine where casualties from the nerve agent attack lived, it will confirm that the findings reported by the White House Report are incompatible with its own cited data.
- It also establishes that the White House Report did not utilize simple and widely agreed upon intelligence analysis procedures to determine its conclusions.
This raises troubling questions about how the US political and military leadership determined that the Syrian government was responsible for the alleged attack. It is particularly of concern that the White House Report presented itself as a report with “high confidence” findings and that numerous high-level officials in the US government have confirmed their belief that the report was correct and executed to a standard of high confidence.
Theodore A. Postol
Professor Emeritus of Science,
Technology, and National Security Policy
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Email: [email protected]
Follow this link to read the full thirteen page report (The Nerve Agent Attack that Did Not Occur).
PT
Other than those who frequent alternative media like SST who else cares about facts that Prof. Postol brings to attention? Not those who get their "information" from Rachel Maddow or Wolf Blitzer or David Ignatius or Tom Friedman.
Posted by: Sam Peralta | 19 April 2017 at 12:55 PM
French FM says he will produce a "proof" in "a matter of days" on the gvt responsability.
« C’est une question de jours, mais nous apporterons la preuve que le régime a bien organisé ces frappes avec des armes chimiques. J’exprime une conviction, dans quelques jours je pourrai vous apporter des preuves », a déclaré le chef de la diplomatie française
http://www.lemonde.fr/syrie/article/2017/04/19/attaque-chimique-ayrault-met-en-cause-le-regime-syrien_5113868_1618247.html#FteA7fAd6vH2ZxAG.99
(Informing, not endorsing, indeed... I do remember vividly (& shamefully) the declaration of Fabius, our former FM on Al Nosra doing " a very good job" in Syria...)
Posted by: Philippe | 19 April 2017 at 01:59 PM
Well, they have had over a week to produce new videos and photographs and to dummy up some biological samples. Really, I am appalled at the amateurish production to date of the propaganda. If this is what the current crop of PSYOP (now MISO) officers or Hollywood for that matter, can do we are in big trouble. You would think with trillions of dollars being pumped into the military they could do better than this. Although if La La Land is the best they can do then maybe this is the way it is now and the bar is just very low now. What scares me is that Trump or his advisors actually believe this tripe.
Posted by: Old Microbiologist | 19 April 2017 at 02:20 PM
Boris Johnson stated in the House of Commons yesterday (https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2017-04-18/debates/44BA2CB7-F44F-4AA5-9E80-861781949F82/SyriaAndNorthKorea)
"We know from shell fragments in the crater that sarin had not only been used, but that it was sarin carrying the specific chemical signature of sarin used by the Assad regime."
I think the most likely interpretation of this is that Porton Down has matched the chemical profile of the samples they were given (purportedly from Khan Sheikhoun) to the ones they analysed from Ghouta in 2013. Of course all this establishes is that the perpetrators of Ghouta and Khan Sheikhoun had access to the same supply of kitchen sarin. I don't think Johnson means that the KS sarin has been compared with the sarin precursor DF destroyed on the MV Cape Ray: the UK government isn't supposed to have access to OPCW's data on the chemical profiling of this material, so Johnson wouldn't have been allowed to use it in a statement.
The hole they have now dug themselves into is that now they have admitted that environmental samples were passed to Porton Down, we can bring pressure on them to publish a detailed chemical profile that can be compared with the known synthetic pathway used for Syrian military stocks.
Posted by: pmr9 | 19 April 2017 at 02:29 PM
To whon did Professor Postal send his report? I ask because I want to know all the people to whom I can send a copy of the report, people in Congress who could possibly care about the truth. I am not sure there are many people left who do care about the truth since to some the truth is whatever they want to think it is.
I just get so frustrated that so many supposedly bright and in-the-know people simply spout whatever someone has told them is true without looking into the facts for themselves.
Posted by: Priam's Crazy Daughter | 19 April 2017 at 03:17 PM
The logistics of nerve agent chemical weapons deserve some scrutiny since (according to published information) they are either stored as binary precursors, then mixed and poured into the munitions shortly before deployment, or, like the M687 artillery shell, each precursor is poured into separate volumes divided by a rupturable barrier so that they mix and react in flight. This is the difference between a binary weapon and a binary munition.
This is comparatively easy to do with a shell because of the considerable linear and angular accelerations that it undergoes. Conversely, a bomb or rocket is much harder due to the significantly reduced energy input. A rocket would suffer much more, since any mechanical mixer would necessarily compromise its range and/or payload.
The implications are that one needs a significant number of mixing and filling facilities in as many locations as the General Staff regard necessary. This would explain the multiplicity of locations that were seen to by the decommissioning organization.
Now imagine each facility. Firstly, it must be safe, which is no small task. Secondly, it must operate as quickly and efficiently as possible since wars don't wait for anyone.
So how to do it? This is where I can only speculate. Batch filling in a sealed environment by heavily protected operators, then a neutralizing washdown appears at least feasible and the appropriate technology. In addition there would be bulk tanks, metering devices (I suppose buckets and scales are at least possible), mixers, filling devices and of course heavy lifting equipment.
Apologies if I'm stating the obvious, but deploying these things is way more complex than the simple logistics of explosive munitions; their storage life demands it and the result is that forensic investigation ought to be entirely obvious if the airbase was guilty as charged.
Posted by: Jonathan | 19 April 2017 at 04:55 PM
Profiling doesn't help much , if at all. Both sides have access to whatever flavor of sarin they want , if they've got the cash.
It would be a miracle if 95% of Assad's stockpile was actually located and destroyed. They destroyed 1300-plus tons , so even just 5% would be ~ 65 tons that are still floating around , and sarin was a major fraction of Assad's original stock.
From Foreign Policy (9-17-16 ) "How the Islamic State Seized a Chemical Weapons Stockpile ":
"( Dec. 2012 )....Within a day, the combined jihadi forces had broken through the lines of the Syrian Army. Shortly after, Regiment 111 was fully under jihadi control. They found large stocks of weapons, ammunition and, to their surprise, chemical agents. They were, according to Abu Ahmad, mainly barrels filled with chlorine, sarin, and mustard gas.
What followed was the distribution of the war spoils. Everybody took some ammunition and weapons. But only the Nusra Front seized the chemical weapons. Abu Ahmad watched as the al Qaeda affiliate called in 10 large cargo trucks, loaded 15 containers with chlorine and sarin gas, and drove them away to an unknown destination. He did not see what happened to the mustard gas....."
Then there's the Turkey ratline , which routed Libya's old stuff ( via Benghazi ) into Syria during HRC's day in the sun , as well as new global black-market goodies today.
The common story , repeated endlessly by all of the MSM and far too many in the alt-media , is that Assad surely has a secret stash , and only he could have the "good stuff" , or the expertise to use it , or the weapons to deliver it , etc. It's all BS.
Right now some of the most sophisticated commandos on the planet
( backed by some of the biggest piles of money ) are embedded with tribes of head-choppers. If a job - any job - is important enough to the guys that sign the checks , the head-choppers - given time - can and will get it done.
Posted by: Marko | 19 April 2017 at 07:06 PM
I'm shocked. Shocked!
Posted by: ex-PFC Chuck | 19 April 2017 at 07:56 PM
In his statement to the House, the Minister references a crater. Has anyone asked him where this crater is specifically located? Is it the same crater that Professor Postol has been using to underpin his analysis? Thanks.
Posted by: John_Frank | 19 April 2017 at 08:00 PM
You're stating the obvious for using CWs as WMDs , not as weapons of terror and/or as the foci of false-flag extravaganzas.
Sarin attacks over the last few years have been pretty effective as false-flag events , always generating the hyberbolic demonization of Assad that's designed to push the U.S. / the West deeper into the conflict. This last one , with Ivanka calling the shots , drew blood for the first time , though limited to "only" 5 dozen Tomahawks.
Would the outcome have been different if killing efficiency was somehow doubled ? Impossible to know ? No. Ask yourself the same question about the Japan subway sarin attacks. What if they had managed to kill 24 instead of only 12 ? Meaningless , right ? They terrorized thousands with only 12 deaths ( as they would have with 6 or 24 ), and that was the point. Their high-tech delivery vehicle and launch mechanism ? A zip-lock bag full of sarin that they punctured with their umbrella tip just before they hopped off the subway. And half-assed sarin is good enough for government-overthrow work. A bonus is that your unreacted DF binary component is also a nerve agent , its just not as potent as sarin.
For the quantities used in Syria , a production lab is anywhere you want it to be. You fill your binary artillery shells at your leisure and store them. For bombs or rockets , you pre-mix and fill them with unitary sarin and plan to use up those munitions within a month or two or three. Frankly , that will probably mean one or two munitions , if that. For one or two guys , this ain't even a part-time job , it's an occasional hobby.
An ideal location ? and probably not coincidentally ? Those exit tunnels at the clinic of Dr. Pinpoint Pupils. Set up a big fan at the inside end to blow the fumes past your mix and fill operation and on to the outside exit. And that white , carbonate soil , wetted down with water a bit , will destroy any spilled sarin almost instantly. Yes , you should have a hazmat suit or two , but even without , there's an alternative. Find one guy who's reasonably intelligent and has a bit of MacGyver in him. He'll make it work , and live to tell the others how he does it.
Don't believe the MSM bull. This ain't brain surgery.
Posted by: Marko | 19 April 2017 at 09:25 PM
I'm shocked! Shocked! (Casablanca)
https://youtu.be/SjbPi00k_ME
Posted by: John_Frank | 19 April 2017 at 09:41 PM
"French FM says he will produce a "proof" in "a matter of days" on the gvt responsability."
Let's face it, he has to produce his "proof" in "a matter of days", because he's going to be kicked out of office in "a matter of days." But since he already knows that evidence will provide "proof" of "government responsibility" - why doesn't he release it now?
Just what blackmail material does the Borg hold on all these "politicians" to ensure they keep up their fervid warmongering even unto (political) death?
Posted by: johnf | 20 April 2017 at 02:33 AM
Yesterday the OPCW released a statement where it confirmed that the analysis on biological samples gathered from ten of the victims (7 injured people still under treatment and 3 dead) prove that they were subjected to the effects of sarin or a sarin-like substance.
Interestingly, they don't say anything about chlorine or any other "smelly" toxic agent.
Here the press statement on the OPCW website:
https://www.opcw.org/news/article/opcw-director-general-shares-incontrovertible-laboratory-results-concluding-exposure-to-sarin/
Posted by: Leonardo | 20 April 2017 at 05:56 AM
FWIW:
https://www.opcw.org/news/article/opcw-director-general-shares-incontrovertible-laboratory-results-concluding-exposure-to-sarin/
Posted by: Allen Thomson | 20 April 2017 at 08:03 AM
This seems to get us back to David Habakkuk's contribution. Or what felt like the core of his contribution. To the extend I recall his argument.
Only scanned both his and Postel's work that far. Without more seriously trying to "digest" matters. Meaning taking notes/excerpts.
Seems OPCW's evidence is connected to the three victims in Turkey.
https://www.opcw.org/news/article/opcw-director-general-shares-incontrovertible-laboratory-results-concluding-exposure-to-sarin/
The bio-medical samples collected from three victims during their autopsy were analysed at two OPCW designated laboratories. The results of the analysis indicate that the victims were exposed to Sarin or a Sarin-like substance. Bio-medical samples from seven individuals undergoing treatment at hospitals were also analysed in two other OPCW designated laboratories. Similarly, the results of these analyses indicate exposure to Sarin or a Sarin-like substance.
Posted by: LeaNder | 20 April 2017 at 09:12 AM
Vaporware. Lying is quite some work, so they really need these days to come up with something which calms down the rising uneasiness among some MSM outlets.
Posted by: Kassandra | 20 April 2017 at 09:43 AM
Fun body language analysis of Assad and McMaster talking about Khan Sheikhoun.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8lyktVh4yQ
Assad is very proud of his military.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1u-CyBLjoEY
McMaster begins at 7.49.
Posted by: LondonBob | 20 April 2017 at 01:34 PM
I don't know whether this has been mentioned or not in previous threads:
Syrian crater ‘too small’ for toll: ex-UN inspector Barton
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/defence/syrian-crater-too-small-for-toll-exun-inspector-barton/news-story/f3e2a0e291a70b40d8ceac445d10772b
Posted by: The Beaver | 20 April 2017 at 02:09 PM
Happy to join the fray, here comes the conspiracy theorists and fake propaganda:
https://time.com/4746951/syria-bashar-assad-israel-military-chemical-weapons/
A senior military official says Israeli military intelligence estimates that Assad has "between one and three tons" of chemical weapons.
He spoke on condition of anonymity under military briefing rules. The assessment was confirmed by two other defense officials.
Yellow cake circa 2002, anyone :-)
Posted by: The Beaver | 20 April 2017 at 02:13 PM
"hundreds of kilograms" @ the 4:00 minute mark in the audio link below.
http://talkradio.co.uk/news/former-nato-chief-plays-down-world-war-three-talk-putin-knows-his-force-no-match-trumps
Posted by: Mikey | 20 April 2017 at 05:02 PM
"He says she says he said..."
Posted by: trinlae | 20 April 2017 at 05:14 PM
Well, head of OPCW is a Turkish guy.....
Posted by: aleksandar | 20 April 2017 at 05:38 PM
From the link you provided: "Former director of strategic technology in Australia’s Defence Intelligence Organisation Rod Barton said identifying the gas source was difficult while key questions remained unanswered about the type of munition or the number of bombs or craters."
The jihadists said there were 4 explosions, 3 were conventional weapons, 1 was gas. "01:47 – “Syrian airstrikes targeted Khan Sheikoun with four rockets, one of them contained chemical gas, it hit a residential area in the northern side of the city. Since the chemical rocket incident until now, the Syrian airforce won’t stop hovering over the city and shelling it.” "
https://www.bellingcat.com/news/mena/2017/04/05/khan-sheikhoun-chemical-attack-evidence-far/
Video of area hit: https://youtu.be/MYOMEDK_uVs
Posted by: Mikey | 20 April 2017 at 05:50 PM
At the end of the linked article, we are told:
As to the crater size at the alleged release point as shown in the open source video:
Where exactly was the release point?
While administration officials talked about a crater in the background briefing as potentially being the release point, within the context of refuting the Russian narrative, as Professor Postol acknowledges, that is an assumption.
What additional information will the various intelligence agencies and Defense Departments involved provide the OPCW fact finding mission?
(Reference has been made to a video of the attack as conducted by the Syrian Arab Armed Forces, as well as statements made by US Army officials. Will that information find its way into the hands of the OPCW fact finding mission?)
Will it be necessary for a team of experts from the OPCW to visit the area to determine the release point?
Posted by: John_Frank | 20 April 2017 at 06:44 PM
Send it to Tulsi Gabbard.
Posted by: Seamus Padraig | 20 April 2017 at 08:50 PM