"Turkey-backed forces will move toward the northern Syrian town of Manbij after completing their operation in al-Bab as originally planned, Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan said on Tuesday.
In a news conference in Ankara before embarking on an official visit to Pakistan, Erdogan also said the Syrian Kurdish YPG militia - which Turkey regards as a terrorist organization - should be moved out to the east of the Euphrates river.
Erdogan also ruled out any chance of cooperation with the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), which includes the Syrian Kurdish militia." Reuters
---------------
Turkish Air Force aircraft are now supposedly bombing SDF irregulars (including the YPG Kurds). These forces are closely advised and accompanied by USSF (Green Berets). These Turkish Air Force bombs and rockets are probably provided by the United States since Turkey is still a member state of NATO. Where else would they get aerial ordnance? Is there a 500 lb. bomb factory somewhere in Turkey? Trump went to JB Andrews to receive the dead body of the SEAL who died in Yemen. This experience of the result of actual war seems to have affected the CinC. If the Turks keep bombing the SDF and seriously attempt to move their Syrian proxies toward Manbij there are likely to be quite a few more American bodies for him and Ivanka to meet at Andrews. I think TTG will agree with me that our GB brothers are likely to die at the sides of those they now see as comrades.
What would be the result of a Turkish/US proxy war in NE Syria? IMO such a war would lead to the exit of Turkey from NATO, a cessation of Turkish inclusion in NATO contingency plans and a departure of the US and its nuclear weapons from Incirlik AFB at Adana in Turkey.
Does Erdogan really want that? Perhaps he does. He has shown every symptom of neo-Ottoman and Islamist thinking until now. Why not this? A crucial moment in the history of US-Turkish relations has arrived.
BTW, with regard to the reconnaissance operation in Yemen in which SCPO Owens died; a reconnaissance in which you lose men is NOT a failure unless the reconnaissance mission is not accomplished. pl
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-turkey-idUSKBN1670YC
Col. Lang:
That is just a public pose by him; hoping to fool Russian and Iranian leaders.
He is, in my opinion, on script with the rest of Fortress West - Wound-Iran-In-Syria.
I suppose the idea is that after Iran's wings are clipped, Gulfies will reimburse him - as well as EU.
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 01 March 2017 at 08:09 PM
"What would be the result of a Turkish/US proxy war in NE Syria? "
On the other hand; every one concerned with terrorism and safety of troops, should help this legislation pass
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Introduces Legislation to Stop Arming Terrorists
https://gabbard.house.gov/news/press-releases/video-rep-tulsi-gabbard-introduces-legislation-stop-arming-terrorists
Posted by: Rd | 01 March 2017 at 08:28 PM
There are several photos of a group of four Special Forces models of the HMMWV with up-armor kits installed. They appear new and one has what appears to be an air movement manifest marker still attached. Normally four of these vehicles are manned by one SFOD-A. Two vehicles fly American flags. Several YPG soldiers and at least one Toyota technical are also in the photos. My guess is this is a new team brought in to reinforce the MMC. This is in addition to those GB brethren already embedded with the MMC and YPG. I agree that these GB brothers are willing to die at the sides of those they now see as comrades. Before that, they will make the Turks and the FSA jihadis pay dearly.
Now we will see what Trump and his administration are made up. It's time to nut up or shut up.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 01 March 2017 at 08:47 PM
Right now the US and Russia view Erdogan as a useful idiot. When that changes and they both view him as just an idiot...
Posted by: BraveNewWorld | 01 March 2017 at 09:27 PM
Col. Lang:
Erdogan may be preparing to leave NATO. Erdogan and Putin are scheduled to meet soon to discuss the purchase of an S-400 system. It's difficult to imagine that Putin would sell this system if Turkey remained in NATO.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/sputniknews.com/amp/military/201702281051120583-s-400-deal-putin-erdogan-talks/?espv=1
Posted by: Liza | 01 March 2017 at 09:28 PM
The Syrian war imo has featured a certain tolerance for slop, i.e. Turkey shoots down Russian fighter, US attacks Syrian troops at Deir Ezzor, Russian aircraft attack Kurdish fighters near Aleppo, etc.
The Turks don't have the best track record of taking and holding ground, thus the notion of taking Manbij has an element of doubt. Turkey adjusts expectations under pressure to get something out of this clusterf*.
The threshold at which US decides to back its friends and save our SF by fire support is likely determined by tactical necessity on the ground, correct? How far will Erdogan go to save face if more flag-draped coffins return to Andrews due to Turkish-supported fire?
Posted by: Stumpy | 01 March 2017 at 09:50 PM
Let's hope that Erdogan's bombast is to his base for the coming referendum. But the man thinks he is the reincarnation of Suleiman the Magnificent, so who knows whether he will pull the trigger. He has probably been watching too many Turkish historical soap operas about the Ottomans. There is a biopic film about him titled "Reis", which translates to "the chief" in english.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-21/turkey-parliament-triggers-referendum-on-presidential-system-iy6kd8n6
http://www.businessinsider.com/ap-biopic-about-turkeys-president-screened-at-birthday-gala-2017-2
Plus Putin would love to see Turkey out of NATO and the removal of NATO aircraft from Incirlik. So who knows if there are subtle wedge issues being exploited in the press?
Posted by: mike | 01 March 2017 at 11:51 PM
The Al-Sanadid depicted in the blood red shield icon, top right on your graphic are an interesting group. They are an Arab militia from the Shammar tribe. They are very anti-Wahhabi and anti-Saudi. Originally from the southern Arabian Peninsula, some came north to Syria in the 18th century, some others in the early 20th century when Ibn Saud and his Wahhabi's restored his family's rule.
The Sanadid forces come primarily from northeastern Syria and number 4 to 5000 fighters. They are neither for nor against Assad. The Shammar have had a long relationship with the Syrian Kurds. They were the only Arab tribe to refuse to fight against Kurds who were protesting during the 2004 Qamishli riots.
http://www.france24.com/en/20160314-focus-syria-sanadid-sunni-force-islamic-state-group
What does their Arabic script insignia say on the shield?
Posted by: mike | 02 March 2017 at 12:44 AM
Posting a remarkable expose [https://belluminexpertis.wordpress.com/2017/02/28/an-army-in-disarray-turkish-military-and-the-comeback-of-the-bashibozouk/]>expose (clearly by current or former officer) on the accelerating degringolade of the Turkish Armed Forces.
From having studied Argentine Army in Falklands in some detail, I've have always been a bit skeptical of the assumption "conscripts + COIN = military ineffectiveness" (they can and did in Falklands, but via more subtle mechanisms than is usually understood) but this (plus the scale of the ongoing purges [http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/11/turkey-army-advertising-for-special-forces-personnel.html]) goes well beyond anything I've seen. It'd take a Malaparte or Celine to do it justice.
For what it's worth, I think "FSA" numbers are being underreported, and what Turkey plans is to use Ahrar as Sham [always its principal client among the jihadi groups) as the infantry while they supply air and artillery support (tanks seem to being used to shell from a distance--those early losses (href='https://southfront.org/new-data-reveals-how-many-military-equipment-turkey-lost-in-attempts-to-capture-al-bab/)] seem to have made someone much more cautions).
[Literal PS--just saw this]: On the other hand, https://southfront.org/new-data-reveals-how-many-military-equipment-turkey-lost-in-attempts-to-capture-al-bab/. (announcement by SDF Manbij Military Council--it's official).
Posted by: Gabriel | 02 March 2017 at 06:47 AM
BREAKING: Kurdish-led SDF to handover huge section of territory to SAA
By Andrew Illingworth
AMN March 2
"The Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) are to hand over a massive section of their territory west of Manbij to the Syrian Arab Army in order to create a buffer zone against the Turkish Army and Turkey-led forces in northern Syria. The map above is an initial estimate of the area which will be handed over to pro-government forces and not official.
[...]"
https://www.almasdarnews.com/article/breaking-kurdish-led-sdf-handover-huge-section-territory-saa/
Posted by: Pundita | 02 March 2017 at 07:34 AM
Gabriel
If the Turkish military is in such pitiful condition Erdogan can blame himself for purging the officer corps repeatedly in fear of a rebellion. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 02 March 2017 at 08:31 AM
Interesting implications from several angles, particularly if it allowed SDF resources to be redirected towards Raqqa.
Posted by: Henshaw | 02 March 2017 at 08:38 AM
mike
"Rais" (ra-ees) is an Arabic loan word in Turkish. It obviously means "boss," "chief," etc. It also forms compound words as in "rais al-jumhuriyet" means "presidentt of the republic." You can fins thd term in any Arabic newspaper. I don't read Turkish. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 02 March 2017 at 08:47 AM
Stumpy
None of the "slop" ever surprises me. It is in the nature of war that there is "slop." This reminds me of a civilian colleague in DIA who expressed surprise that weapons and other equipment do not function as advertised by manufacturers. I laughed more than I should have. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 02 March 2017 at 09:08 AM
Thank you for the link.
Whomever aspires to partition Syria, will have to actually pay for the sustenance of that population which it controls. Will Fortress West pay for "Northern Syria" that is going to be occupied by Turkey indefinitely?
Fortress West does pay for the Occupation of West Bank as well as Afghanistan - without a doubt. Will they add Northern Syria to it?
I do not think so.
Or is that supposed to come from the Gulfies?
Doubtful for long period of time.
In an analogous situation, Russia is now paying for Eastern oblasts of Ukraine.
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 02 March 2017 at 09:19 AM
Current news from Yemen says that there is -right now- a large raid ongoing today by U.S. forces against yet unknown targets. Allegedly in multiple locations, with air support and some sea landing.
On the earlier raid:
According to local sources in Yemen the SEAL raiders did not enter any homes and seized no equipment from homes. The raid was targeted, said other reports, at an AQ bigwig who, it turned out, wasn't there. That makes a lot more sense than the supposed "intelligence" raid.
Early eye witness accounts also claimed that two men were abducted by U.S. forces though I did not see any follow ups of that assertion. The clan that was raided was known be in the pay of the Saudis and was known to be al-Qaeda affiliated. The Yemeni proxy president Hadi was allegedly informed about the mission. Maybe someone around him warned the target?
AQ in Yemen is now a proxy of the Saudis. There is a lot of fighting between the UAE, which had elements taking part in the SEAL raid, and the Saudis. This is a violent competition over port and pipeline rights.
The SEAL raid was a SWAT raid against some Saudi asset. It was blown early on but instead to retreat and try gain later the SEALs unleashed hell on everyone around them. A stupid overreacting but consistent with the behavior of this unit in other missions in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The SEALs should be urged to find back to their original missions. Their troops have degraded into overhyped shooter/killer gangs. That is far away from their original and more cautious profile.
Posted by: b | 02 March 2017 at 09:27 AM
The only issue uniting Russia and U.S. in Syria now is fighting Erdogan and his proxies.
Somewhat ironic ...
Posted by: b | 02 March 2017 at 09:31 AM
From further down in the same article:
“To reach these objectives [the defense of Manbij] we have transferred, after reaching a new alliance with Russia, the defence of the line to the west of Manbij – where the villages between us and the gang groups [FSA, Ahrar al-Sham] affiliated to the Turkish army are – to Syrian state forces.”
So the Kurds were talking to Moscow. Have the full un-redacted transcripts of Flynn's conversation with the "Russian Ambassador" been published? I don't think so. So perhaps Syria and destroying ISIS is what Flynn was discussing and sanctions were just a misdirection if indeed they were discussed, and that's why Flynn had to go for the time being.
Posted by: Ghostship | 02 March 2017 at 09:35 AM
As a Persian proverb goes “here are two words (cents) from the mother of the bride” in this case the WP editorial board and Fred Haitt. Dear colonel’ pilgrims, IMO, nothing has changed, Borg has won once again. As the other Fred, Fred Sanford of Sanford and Son use to say, holding his hand on his heart “Elizabeth honey I am coming to join you, this is the big one” Colonel sorry for lengthy paste up.
“The U.S. should use its leverage on Syria”
“Ms. Haley, who lunched with Mr. Trump and Vice President Pence the day before the Security Council’s meeting, insisted on a vote so that the Putin and Xi Jinping regimes were forced to go on the record. Then she bluntly called them out. “It’s a sad day on the Security Council,” she said. “When members start making excuses for other member states killing their own people, the world is definitely a more dangerous place.”
“The ambassador’s forceful diplomacy was useful for more than sending the message that the Trump administration will be, like all U.S. administrations before it, ready to oppose war crimes. We hope it also is meant to put Mr. Putin on notice that Mr. Trump’s stated willingness to join with him in fighting the Islamic State will not extend to tolerating gross human rights violations or propping up the blood-soaked Assad dictatorship. An alliance with Russia that abetted such actions would only discredit the United States, including with its major allies in the Middle East; the chief beneficiary would be Iran, which has made the Assad regime its puppet and which has the largest interest in sustaining it.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/the-us-should-use-its-leverage-on-syria/2017/03/01/a1272bd4-fea0-11e6-8ebe-6e0dbe4f2bca_story.html?utm_term=.5534f66fec56#comments
Posted by: kooshy | 02 March 2017 at 09:59 AM
Be interesting who suggested that and at what level it was improved, very smart, bodes well for future cooperation. Allowing Erdogan to play Russia and the US off against each other benefits neither party. Putin has clearly shown how to handle Erdogan, I should hope Trump has watched and learned, even if Frau Merkel hasn't.
Posted by: LondonBob | 02 March 2017 at 10:20 AM
So Haley's idea, or whoever feeds her her ideas. A meaningless resolution that would have no effect. Trump must move cautiously, especially until he can consolidate his position with the 2018 midterms. Look how carefully phrased Trump's comments on foreign policy were in his address, although I thought the message was clear enough. Change would always be slow and largely occur below the surface, but change is coming.
Posted by: LondonBob | 02 March 2017 at 10:29 AM
That was a good move. Before that you had three different armies within hand grenade range of each other, which was a disaster waiting to happen.
Now, to take Manbij, Erdogan is faced with either taking on the SAA to the west of Manbij, or the US to the north of Manbij.
The big question in my mind is when and how the Syrian regime will push the Turks completely out of northern Aleppo province and send them back behind their own borders? Will the Turks go peacefully? The Iraqis face the same situation with Turkish bases in northern Iraq.
But that probably will not happen until Daesh an al-Qaeda are defeated.
Posted by: mike | 02 March 2017 at 10:40 AM
Prior to the handover, the SDF beat off an attack west of Manbij. They are reporting they killed 12 Ahrar Al-Sham fighters, injured 30 Others, captured 2 Turks and seized 3 armoured vehicles. ACV-15s maybe?
Posted by: mike | 02 March 2017 at 11:16 AM
Damn, having brackets at the end of links made them useless. Sorry people.
Main article, which strongly recommended is here https://belluminexpertis.wordpress.com/2017/02/28/an-army-in-disarray-turkish-military-and-the-comeback-of-the-bashibozouk/
A second piece that I think is also important in showing how (a) the purges are targeting junior officers and even senior enlisted personnel and (b) they are ongoing and happening in small batches, here http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/11/turkey-army-advertising-for-special-forces-personnel.html
Posted by: Gabriel | 02 March 2017 at 11:17 AM
الصناديد al sanadid
Posted by: LG | 02 March 2017 at 11:59 AM