"Naftali Bennett and Lebanese president agree: There's no line between Hezbollah and Lebanese state. Lebanese must realize another war with Israel means Lebanon will be sent back to Middle Ages, Bennett tells Haaretz. " haaretz
---------------
Naftali Bennett evidently wants himself to be thought Israel's Curtis Lemay. Lemay's B-29s killed 100,000 Japanese civilians in one night over Tokyo.
I suppose this is all political BS reflecting NB's desire to replace Bibi at some future date. Bibi is looking like something approaching its "sell buy" date. He is being investigated for graft. He has also sued a reporter for asserting in print that his wife treats him like a not very valued dog. NB is watching in the light of ever increasing Israeli xenophobia and belligerence towards its Arab neighbors. Israel has for many years sought (successfully) to use American leverage to exclude Hizbullah from Lebanese government in spite of its electoral power. This is now at an end with Michel Aoun's statement that Hizbullah s an integral part of the Lebanese state. In response Bennett threatens a general application of the theory of strategic bombing if Hizbullah fires into Israel.
Well pilgrims, the trouble with that is the actual separation (as I have written before) of the Hizbullah fortified Belt (Tabouleh Line II) and its fortified firing positions for 20 to 30 K of advanced model artillery rockets with longer range and guided missiles from the civil infrastructure and population of Lebanon.
In 2006 Israel attempted to breach Tabouleh Line I and failed. Nose to nose ground combat against HB headbangers in prepared positions wasn't something they could face up to. Air power? There was a lot of fairly small caliber anti-aircraft fire over HB lines and Israeli pilots evidently discovered that a "golden BB" (small arms hit) would kill them as dead as any gentile pilot. As a result accuracy in their air attacks on HB positions went WAY DOWN. At the same time the IDF (then headed by a bird man) carried out a country-wide air offensive against Lebanese civilian infrastructure and people. This wrecked the place but it had ZERO effect on the outcome of the 2006 War. HB moved back to prepared positions a few kilometers north to allow the UN to place peacekeeping forces between them and the Israelis and then re-construction in Lebanon began yet again.
A re-run of Israel's 2006 plan will prove nothing except to demonstrates that the IDF has no ability to keep HB from firing heavily into Israeli populated areas. The IDF knows this. Evidently Bennett does not. pl
Making Israel safe from the danger posed by Hezbollah and any other Iran-backed fighters that might threaten the state is central to the terms for settling the Syria conflict. To that end, Israel and Jordan are supposedly planning to protect their border zones with the help of the “Southern Front,” a group made up of the southern Syrian tribes that were trained in Jordan with US and Jordanian help and Saudi funding. Israel will not accept SAA or Hezbollah in the Golan.
Does anyone know just what groups this “Southern Front” is made up of and whether it includes any of the Nusra jihadis that Israel was providing medical treatment for? Whoever they are, be sure that the Druze militias in Suwayda will not welcome them on their turf.
Posted by: Annem | 14 March 2017 at 12:14 PM
Annem
You understand what Israel wants. The question is if this exceeds their grasp. Have you spent a lot of time in Israel? pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 14 March 2017 at 12:32 PM
Annem
I remember going up to the "good fence," crossing and meeting with South Lebanese Army leaders when Danny Rothschild was their guardian and shepherd. What makes you think that the buffer you speak of on the Golan's east side will work any better. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 14 March 2017 at 12:52 PM
"A re-run of Israel's 2006 plan will prove nothing ..."
It will prove a significant quantitative and qualitative increase in Hizbullah's capabilities. An attack on Lebanese civilian infrastructure would be responded to with similar attacks on critical points of Israeli infrastructure. When Tel Aviv sits in the dark for a few days, with little water, airport closed, harbor blockaded, the Israeli government that started the fight will immediately fall.
---
Currently ISIS and Nusra share parts of the Golan and the strip to the Jordan border. The Jordan controlled FSA aka Southern Front is shrinking and can barely hold against them. If Israel hopes to happily live with AQ and ISIS right next to it, it is in for a few surprises.
Someone will need to "clean up" the area. The Syrian government and its supporting forces are likely the only ones who can. That is a task that currently has low priority from the Syrian view. When it finally happens Israel will have to live with it.
Posted by: b | 14 March 2017 at 02:41 PM
You bet he did..... I Loooove the new headline for Al-Nusra head shoppers and liver eaters.... " Southern Front " Syrian tribes..... it's a cutie beautie!!! Let IDF succeed in keeping the Galilée....before leveling stupid threats.
Posted by: Willybilly | 14 March 2017 at 02:53 PM
One news item that may be driving Naftali's madness is Breitbart and Haaretz and the al-Jarida newspaper that the IRGC is building rocket factories for Hez in Lebanon. I don't know whether the reports are BS or not. But they are out there. So they are probably driving Naftali bonkers, along with Bibi and the rest of the right-wing crazies over there.
Posted by: mike | 14 March 2017 at 03:18 PM
Well,what can I say, me thinks, the day that Israelies feel/ need to rely and trust any arab tribe or not for thier border security must be an acute day of desperation or a without any better choice, frankly a laughable plan. You must not be avare of European imigrant ashkenazi Jews and Sunni Arabs, specially the border Arabs. The relationship of ashkenazi Jews and Sunni Arabs is not any better than that of Persians and arabs, if not a few notches up. As they say good luck with that plan.
Posted by: Kooshy | 14 March 2017 at 03:59 PM
"Making Israel safe from the danger posed by Hezbollah and any other Iran-backed fighters that might threaten the state is central to the terms for settling the Syria conflict."
Why is this the case?
Hizballah existed before the Syrian civil war, and took root in a conflict in the 80s largely of Israel's making.
I smell a different agenda here.
Posted by: Mishkilji | 14 March 2017 at 04:02 PM
FYI, as far as I know Arabs are not very forgiving or forgetting people.
Posted by: Kooshy | 14 March 2017 at 04:07 PM
The US, Britain, Saudis and Gulfies now have the Israelis back, so a reasonable guess would be that on a scale of a decade or so the Lebanon-Israel front and Southfront will not be allowed to go ballistic. The potential for very serious damage would see diplomatic intervention, bone-chilling threats and all, before that. But since NB Bennett has shot his mouth off already I wouldn't wager too much against it. Maybe he has to be told just how extremely ugly it could get for everyone. The accumulated firepower boggles the mind. Mutual suicide to tempt those fates. The example of Syria is not comforting.
Posted by: FourthAndLong | 14 March 2017 at 04:20 PM
FourthAndLong
IMO you greatly underestimate what I have called the demonic forces in Man's nature. A crisis in international relations moves fast. but, the idea that Saudi Arabia and the Gulfies are effective friends of Israel ina crisis is amusing and suggests that you think of international relations in absolutes. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 14 March 2017 at 04:48 PM
"IMO you greatly underestimate what I have called the demonic forces in Man's nature."
If there is one thing that's been said here over all these many years that deserves never to be forgotten, "the demonic forces in Man's nature" might be it.
Posted by: Larry Kart | 14 March 2017 at 05:01 PM
Larry Kart
I suppose that is Nietzsche talking through me? Or maybe ... ? pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 14 March 2017 at 05:28 PM
Didn't we go through something like this before? Shades of the SLA.....
Mercenaires, man, a nation can't depend, too much, on that kind of support.
And Hezbollah has gotten much more experienced in this kind of fighting.
Posted by: jonst | 14 March 2017 at 07:57 PM
The end of the Syrian War in the government's favour could well precipitate a Lebanese-Israeli war. Having failed to knock out the Syrian link of the perceived 'Iran threat', they will go straight for the immediate threat in Lebanon.
This time, however, the Russian Bear's diplomatic and military assets might shamble over from Damascus and shut down the caper. Reasons include:
1. Syria and Iran will support Hezbollah and the Lebanese government, which could mean Israeli escalation against Syria.
2. Russian plans for becoming involved in extracting offshore gas deposits in the Med.
3. Internal pressure on Putin by the Orthodox Church to protect Christians in Lebanon.
4. A general war against Lebanon will trigger a period of extended instability that could reignite conflict in Syria.
What would a Russian intervention look like? Russia seals Lebanese airspace, and sends troops to set up a buffer zone on the border and guarantee Hezbollah will stop firing projectiles.
Posted by: Lemur | 14 March 2017 at 08:11 PM
I guess you are right about that. I tend to think of it as a chess game. Leads me to think I fathom capabilities in an abstract sense. Weapons and troop strength argued against Hitler moving into the Rhineland. As did his generals. We do seem to agree on NB being off his rocker though. Seems to be a feature of Israeli politics for some time now.
There's also the element of luck and likelihood that an opponent will be intimidated by apparently demonic or reckless-madman action. In the Rhineland Hitler pulled it off, as the French inexplicably folded. Cowardice may exemplify the demonic as much as does overconfidence. Liddell Hart mentions a Belgian Officer who begged permission of French commanders to cut down oak trees along a road used by German tanks in 1940 on their way to Calais and Dunkirk. Hart claims an affirmative response to the proposed blockade would have stopped that instance of a successful blitzkrieg cold. A God-awfully huge number of variables.
My dad did not set much store in ideas like the Maginot line or Hitler's reckless ingenuity vis a vis the French in WWII. He simply repeated "they lost the creme of their manhood in the Great War and were a spent force ... ."
Excuse my maundering Sir. You've set me to thinking. If there aren't perhaps similarly very obscure details pertinent to the case of Israel Lebanon etc.
Posted by: FourthAndLong | 14 March 2017 at 08:14 PM
Mike I do believe this is a good case of "fake news". It originated in a Kuwaiti newspaper with ties to Israel
Posted by: inda | 14 March 2017 at 08:17 PM
I was in Beirut in 70 or 71 (yes I know that makes me ancient) when the Isrealis bombed the Beirut Airport. They were up and running the next day. It was the Palestinians then - just sayin.
Posted by: inda | 14 March 2017 at 08:21 PM
My nephew is a Captain in the Golani Brigade, some of Israel's best fighters. He was in Lebanon fighting the Hezballah the last timeand there is no one in the Brigade who wants to do that again. In fact, the entire command structure of the Golani is so hesitant to fight the Hez again, my nephew suspects that timidness will make Israeli forces even less effective than the last time. Israeli culture makes losing even a single IDF soldier a terrible tragedy, not a good situation for fighting an aggressive war.
Posted by: John LeDell | 14 March 2017 at 08:54 PM
i think both countries have a bit of a paranoia, correctly in the ability for the patron to really interfere in their affairs if we chose to.
Posted by: paul | 14 March 2017 at 10:29 PM
Another way to put it: My best friend's wife -- also a good friend and a very wise woman -- always says "people ruin everything."
BTW, she's not misanthropic on an individual basis; I take her mantra to mean that when people operate collectively and with a self-justfying rationale, the damage they can do knows no bounds.
Posted by: Larry Kart | 14 March 2017 at 11:07 PM
If it comes to blows again between Israel and Lebanon, it's bound to be a slugfest with massive civilian damage on both sides. The problem for Israel is that the Lebanese will suck it up, endure the misery and destruction and then rebuild. A lot of the Israelis will take the first plane out of there to a safer life in Europe or the U.S. once the rockets start falling. The Israelis can't afford losing a lot of their more productive citizens. The settlers will stay, but just suckle at the government teat and add nothing to society. In a destructive stalemate, Israel loses.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 14 March 2017 at 11:11 PM
Inda -
Fake news or not, it is driving the wingnuts crazy. Both here and in Israel. Breitbart strikes again.
Posted by: mike | 14 March 2017 at 11:18 PM
The Israelis do not even trust us(The United States).They certainly will not depend on the Saudis or UAE to have their back............They may try to use them like they use us...........Good luck with that too.
Posted by: Phil Cattar | 15 March 2017 at 12:25 AM
That is why the Greeks called them Phoencians ,after the mythical bird that could not be killed.It just rose up again and again.It is in the Lebanese DNA...................
Posted by: Phil Cattar | 15 March 2017 at 12:30 AM