"Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has promised that Tel Aviv will continue to attack Hezbollah facilities, located in Syria. The statement was made just a day after Israel carried out airstrikes on the territory of the Arab country and admitted this fact.
On Friday, the Israeli Air Force entered the Syrian airspace and struck several targets near Palmyra city. The Syrian government claims that one of the Israeli fighter jets was shot down, while another one was damaged, as Syrian air defense troops launched several anti-aircraft missiles against the warplanes.
On Saturday, the Israeli Prime Minister said that the Friday’s airstrikes targeted a Hezbollah convoy, which transported weapons for the resistance movement.
“When we identify attempts to transfer advanced weapons to Hezbollah and we have intelligence and it is operationally feasible, we act to prevent it,” Netanyahu said. “That’s how it was yesterday and that’s how we shall continue to act.”
Meanwhile, on Friday, Israeli ambassador to Moscow Gary Koren was summoned by the Russian Foreign Ministry for clarification of circumstances of the airstrikes of the Israeli Air Force in Syria. The move was taken just a day after Israeli envoy presented his credentials to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Syrian military called the latest Israeli airstrikes “a desperate attempt” to support the Islamic State (IS) terrorist group, operating on the territory of the Arab country. According to a statement of the Syrian Army, the Israeli attack actually was aimed at positions of government troops in order to weaken their forces, fighting against the IS in the region.
Reportedly, Syrian military have strengthened their presence in the southwestern part of Quneitra province, including the Golan Heights region, after the Israeli airstrikes.
Earlier, it was reported that Israel provided medical treatment for Syrian militants and terrorists, transporting them to the Israeli-occupied Syrian territory of Golan Heights. Last September, an Israeli lawmaker said that the Israeli side was also directly aiding the Jabhat Fateh al-Sham (previously known as the al-Nusra Front) terrorist group in the Golan Heights.
Since 1967, Damascus and Tel Aviv have been technically at war due to Israel’s continued occupation of Syria’s Golan Heights." southfront
----------------
Well, pilgrims, it does not seem that the "subtle message" made much of an impression in the land of Zion. I said they are hard headed and they are. They don't believe in reciprocity. Whatever is yours is theirs and whatever is theirs is theirs.
Back in the day when I was chief of liaison to IDF General Staff intelligence I repeatedly tried to get them to give us some worthless piece of information that I had selected for that purpose and they NEVER came through. On one occasion they said they knew that what I had asked for was unimportant but that they did not want to establish a precedent. I would have cut them off as a lesson but if I had (or could have) they would have gone to CIA who IMO would have been glad to screw DIA by giving them what they wanted.
So, the strike in question was near Palmyra far from the Lebanese border. This supports the belief that the strike was intended to assist IS which is now hard pressed by R+6 forces in that area. pl
https://southfront.org/israeli-prime-minister-promises-continue-hitting-hezbollah-in-syria/
I saw Liberman threatened to destroy Syrian air defense system in response to this incident. A former general and Zionist Union member of the Knesset, Eyal Ben-Reuven, said Russia’s reaction was a major shift in Moscow’s Syria policy. It's a good thing the Russian-Syrian message was as subtle as it was. If the message was any more vigorous, the Israelis would have no choice but to start shooting at everything in sight. When your policy and national ego is based on a fable of unchallengeable superiority, even a subtle challenge appears to be a real kick in the national nuts.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 19 March 2017 at 12:39 PM
Well, that makes things a lot more interesting.
I'm not so sure about the intent to assist IS considering this was only one sortie of 4 aircraft (according to the Syrians). I'm skeptical that one strike would be sufficient to significantly change the outcome of the conflict around Palmyra one way or another.
What's also interesting is that the US coalition conducted 1 airstrike near Palmyra that same day:
http://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/PRESS-RELEASES/Press-Release-View/Article/1121757/march-17-military-airstrikes-continue-against-isis-terrorists-in-syria-and-iraq/
Based on CENTCOM press releases, this was the first coalition strike in the Palmyra area since March 3rd.
Meanwhile Russian and Syrian air activity is high near Palmyra as they support the ground forces in anti-IS operations.
I think this ties back to Netanyahu Russia visit. One of the reported purposes was to reaffirm Israel's military coordination with Russia in the region generally and Syria specifically. I think it's unlikely Israel would coordinate this strike with the Russians, so that could be the reason the Israeli ambassador was summoned afterward.
It's also very unusual for Israeli officials to comment on these operations, but Israeli officials have been unusually blunt about this one. Yisrael Katz, minister for transportation, told Israel's Channel 10 that "...our message is clear, we will not be complacent with a Syrian policy that arms Hezbollah." He added: "the fact that the incident developed into a situation where Israel claimed responsibility and the Syrians responded is significant."
Posted by: Andy | 19 March 2017 at 02:11 PM
Doesn't really sound too good, does it?
OTOH, as some french joker says:
"There is nothing that a kick in the balls or a pressure on reset won't solve."
Posted by: jld | 19 March 2017 at 02:11 PM
Syria claims to have downed 2 IAF jets (separate incidents)
If these claims are removed,....Syria has only downed 1 Turk F4 Reece
And a few drones,....for 6 yrs
http://spioenkop.blogspot.ca/2016/08/photo-report-syrian-arab-air-defence.html
Posted by: Brad | 19 March 2017 at 02:15 PM
May be Bibi is hoping that, should Russia strikes down one of IDF planes, Jared and AIPAC would be forced to get the Pres. Trump and Gen Mattis to go after Russia (indirectly against Iran and Hizb'Allah). He wants to be a S*t disturber
Posted by: The Beaver | 19 March 2017 at 02:42 PM
Col. Lang, SST;
I would have been more impressed had the izzies repeated the attack. They have plenty of planes and ordnance, the distance is short, and there seem to be plenty of targets around. Let us see what next week brings.
Ishmael Zechariah
Posted by: Ishmael Zechariah | 19 March 2017 at 04:11 PM
Palmyra/Deir Ezzor. What is so important about this area? The US/coalition strike on Deir Ezzor, the constant suicidal attacks by ISIS even when loosing ground everywhere else, and now the Israeli strike?
Posted by: Peter AU | 19 March 2017 at 05:40 PM
Putin wants a quiet neighborhood.
Israelis will comply with that wish.
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 19 March 2017 at 05:59 PM
Putin may not have the loud fast power to make Bibi afraid, but he may have slow quiet power to freeze Bibi in place. If so, that would be power indeed.
Posted by: different clue | 19 March 2017 at 06:16 PM
palmyra/dire es sore is strategically central to breaking the shia crescent and creating an american/sunni protectorate in eastern Syria.
Posted by: walrus | 19 March 2017 at 07:51 PM
Peter AU,
If you draw a line from Palmyra (Tadmur) to Deir Ez Zor (Dayr az Zawr), and then a line straight east to the border with Iraq, and then down along the Iraq border to a little ways past the intersection of the Euphrates River and the Iraq border, you will have an area of oil and gas pipelines and oil and gas fields. This is a critically important area.
A while back I mentioned that I was repeating myself so much about the need to take back that area that I was starting to sound like the crazy uncle in the attic. But that is always easier said than done, with the requirement of supplies, equipment, and logistics, and the harsh reality of combat.
There are also oil and gas fields to the north of Palmyra and going northeast of it to the Euphrates River.
This whole area is south of Raqqah and the mishmash of groups and ISIS involved from Raqqa on north toward Turkey. Syria has an opportunity to clear this extremely important area and get control of it outside of the problem of dealing with the Kurds, etc., further north.
Posted by: robt willmann | 19 March 2017 at 08:26 PM
"Israel said to strike Syria for second time in 24 hours, amid threats from Damascus
Unconfirmed reports indicate jets hit Hezbollah weapons convoy, military targets, hours after drone strike in Syrian Golan; Syria UN envoy says retaliatory missile launches during Friday raid a ‘game-changer’"
http://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-said-to-strike-syria-for-second-time-in-24-hours-amid-threats-from-damascus/
"Israeli airstrike in Syrian Golan said to kill pro-Assad fighter
IDF refuses to confirm reported drone strike near Quneitra, as tensions between Jerusalem and Damascus ratchet up"
http://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-airstrike-said-to-kill-driver-in-syrian-golan-heights/
Even with Israel having the entire power of the US military at it's finger tips, giving the finger to Russia just doesn't seem like a smart idea.
But what I really suspect is going on here is this. For at least the last 3 elections Netanahu has run i,n he has started a war for the election to inflate his numbers. Last time it was the Gaza war he started by shooting up the West Bank. Before that it was a few rounds with Hezbollah and before that it was droning the Hamas leader that was enforcing the peace in Gaza. All timed conveniently for the elections.
But Israel isn't in an election you say, well keep a few things in mind. One of the opposition parties is polling as high as Likud is. Netanyahu has been questioned by the police over various things and is likely to be indited soon. And then there is this.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/coalition-chairman-says-good-chance-of-new-elections/
Posted by: BraveNewWorld | 19 March 2017 at 09:10 PM
BraveNewworld
"Even with Israel having the entire power of the US military at it's finger tips," that is not true and it has never been true. Poliical influence yes, ability to command our armed forces? Never! pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 19 March 2017 at 09:41 PM
"Well, pilgrims, it does not seem that the "subtle message" made much of an impression in the land of Zion. "
Izi's squealing, is a reflection of their terrorists ISIS, are on the loosing side. Isis'll squeal even louder.
Posted by: Rd | 19 March 2017 at 09:51 PM
I do not find that scenario credible.
Iran does not need a land bridge through the Syrian Desert.
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 19 March 2017 at 10:51 PM
Russia Insider has copied a paywall protected Haaretz article here:
http://russia-insider.com/en/new-israeli-theory-putin-forgot-tell-assad-its-anti-semitic-fire-idf-jets-bombing-syria/ri19251
The Israeli is depicting the incident as an unpredictable regime trying to slip the collar of their Russian handlers, who fundamentally take Israel's 'concerns' seriously.
If this were so, why was Israel's ambassador summoned in Moscow?
Posted by: Lemur | 20 March 2017 at 12:07 AM
walrus
And why would the US want to protect an area in eastern Syria? For the oil and gas? We are drowning in the stuff. For the Saudis? Oh, come on! pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 20 March 2017 at 01:07 AM
No word on the fate of the pilot? Odd given past history.
Posted by: LJ | 20 March 2017 at 01:15 AM
If I may suggest, Colonel, somebody might just want to show everybody who's boss then get stuck trying to figure out a strategic reason? Stupidity happens.
Posted by: Thirdeye | 20 March 2017 at 03:06 AM
Maybe an elegant solution for Russia would be to test some ECM on Israeli targeting systems.
Posted by: Thirdeye | 20 March 2017 at 03:09 AM
Commodities - control thereof. Revenue for future Sunni/Kurd state/ remove revenue from future Syrian state.
Many in power and positions of influence in the US do not seem to share your principles pl.
Posted by: Peter AU | 20 March 2017 at 03:18 AM
All,
Who ever you call or write keep repeating that Israel supports ISIS because they ARE!!
If they try to defend this, call them terrorist supporters too.
Posted by: Cee | 20 March 2017 at 04:37 AM
All,
Well, well. Israel may have to go it alone. I hope they pay the price ALONE.
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN1601BD
Posted by: Cee | 20 March 2017 at 05:09 AM
Hmmm? From the linked context:
Israel-Syria Clash: With Missile Fire, Assad Is Trying to Change the Rules of the Game
Israel has avoided directly commenting on airstrikes in Syria. Until now.
...Presumably the Syrian anti-aircraft salvo was a signal to Israel that the regime’s policy of restraint in the face of the airstrikes will not remain as it was. President Bashar Assad’s recent successes – first and foremost the conquest of Aleppo – have seemingly increased the dictator’s confidence. Israel will have to decide whether the operational need – to thwart advanced weapons shipments to Hezbollah – also justifies the possible risk of the downing of an Israeli fighter jet and a broader conflict developing with Syria.
There is an interesting question as to whether the aircraft detection radar system was deployed by Israel’s new great friend, Russia, precisely one week after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu returned from Moscow after yet another successful visit to see President Vladimir Putin.
One can imagine that the intelligence community will also be interested to learn whether the Syrian decision to fire back was coordinated with Assad’s collaborators and partners: Russia, Iran and Hezbollah.....
Amos Harel, March 20
Posted by: LeaNder | 20 March 2017 at 06:51 AM
james
If you mean the elected government as represented by the civilian chain of command in the Executive Branch, then the answer is altogether. They tell you to fight, you fight. They tell you to stop, you stop. they give you money and equipment, you use it. The armed forces of the US are altogether subordinate to the civilian government. That does not mean that a certain amount of passive-aggressive behavior does not take place. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 20 March 2017 at 08:34 AM