From the day when the jaws of the Kurdish YPG stronghold at Sheikh Maqsood on the south and the Syrian Army Tiger Forces coming down from the north closed on the Castello Road at the north of the East Aleppo Pocket the lines of circumvalation have been complete and uninterrupted at Aleppo.
Some have have thought that the jihadi/unicorn effort at the SW of Aleppo city had broken the siege, but it did not. Many do not understand that for a route/road/path to be effective as an interruption of a siege it must be useful as a means of transportation for men/supplies/weapons. The penetration of the R+6 lines at SW Aleppo City was never anything like that. The breach was always heavily covered by fire and therefore never useful except for small groups like patrols. By "fire" I mean tank guns, artillery, recoilless rifles, mortars, machine guns and anything else that can shoot at the gap day and night. So far as I know, no supplies went into East Aleppo through the breach. Now, as is shown in the map above, the breach is completely closed and the lines of circumvallation made even stronger. IMO from a military POV rebel East Aleppo is doomed and the Rebel/US/Turkish attempt to relieve the besieged has utterly failed. The attempt to lift the siege of east Aleppo was IMO a maximum effort with assets that have largely been lost and which will be hard, if not impossible, to replace any time soon. the current rebel effort in north Hama Province is a kind of consolation prize for the rebels that will soon be eliminated as a threat.
John Kerry threatened "new measures" after 1 September while at the same time luring the Russians into accepting a "humanitarian" ceasefire. This temporary cessation of hostilities was IMO clearly a ruse de guerre which enabled the pro-rebel sponsoring powers to reinforce massively a rebel force designed to permanently break the government's siege of East Aleppo. It was expected that victory at Aleppo would be provided by Erdogan's enabling actions, but that effort failed and now Obama/Kerry are faced with a need to confront reality in Syria.
IMO Turkey has made a bargain with Russia and Iran in which support for all the rebels (both jihadi and FSA unicorns) who seek the destruction of the Syrian government will largely cease while the Turks are free to destroy Kurdish ambitions east of Aleppo City. The progress of the Russo-Turkish relationship is easily seen in Erdogan's surly nastiness as displayed toward Amtrak Joe Biden in Ankara and toward Obama in China.
With regard to IS, the US/Russian agreement will enable a campaign of extermination against them in eastern Syria and northern Iraq. The Turks will participate in that because Erdogan has come to see them as rivals in Islamism and a threat.
IMO, as a result of these basic changes in circumstances the Obamanites are in search of a face-saving compromise with the Russians over an end to the war in Syria. IMO this is reflected in the the soothing, friendly sounds from both Russia and the United States over the possibility of a ceasefire. Obama does not want to leave the mess in Syria as a stain on his legacy. Since belligerence has failed, he now looks for a prestige restoring alternative.
Can a thinly veiled defeat be disguised as a wonderfully skilled diplomatic success? Yes. The public outcome will promise things like; a new constitution, eventual exile for Bashar Assad, UN supervision of interim elections, etc., etc., ad nauseam.
The underlying truth will be that Syria will remain a multi-confessional state with Bashar Assad as president for a long time. If HC becomes president she will have to face the prospect of a new, and bigger war if she wishes to reverse the situation.
R+6 is going to win. pl
A most sobering, impartial assessment of the current situation. Thank you.
Posted by: Petrous | 06 September 2016 at 12:48 PM
Once the jihadi rebels and ISIS are subtracted from the picture, what will the terms of settlement look like for Kurdish and Turkish held areas? Some sort of partition in Syria is the Empire's plan B after all...
Posted by: Lemur | 06 September 2016 at 01:09 PM
Lemur
The empire has failed IMO and will not dictate the terms of peace. My crystal ball is a bit cloudy as to ultimate status. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 06 September 2016 at 01:29 PM
Thanks you for this excellent, straightforward summary. If only the media was this succinct.
Posted by: plantman | 06 September 2016 at 01:30 PM
Col: I just want to say that the series of post from you, PB, and TGG over the last year on Syria have been fantastic.
I hope that a face-saving "exit" is possible for the West in this ghastly war. Otherwise, the futile mischief making will continue. For example, this morning we had the inevitable, inexplicable "chlorine" attack in Aleppo. See https://twitter.com/Souria4Syrians/status/773143315260829696
I put the "chlorine" in quotes because the SAA always seems to commit an atrocity right at the moment of the rebels' maximum humiliation. Coincidence?
IMHO, Secretary Kerry's actual face-saving strategy will probably involve a pitching a UN-backed International Commission on Syria to use lawyers to win from Assad what TOW missiles could not. Like the Commission on Lebanon, it will totally politicized and subject to constant manipulation. Given that, wouldn't the Russians blunt any such initiative?
Posted by: Matthew | 06 September 2016 at 01:41 PM
I totally agree with what you said, the reality is that R+6 will take Aleppo unless they snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
I am having difficulty seeing how the U.S. can be given the illusion of a diplomatic victory, perhaps it is there, just having trouble seeing it. To me it looks like the Turkish zone is being setup as the safe haven for the moderates (it hurts having to use that word) and the rebel areas outside of that zone will be excluded from any ceasefire. The rebel areas from Aleppo city, to Idlib, and what's left of Latakia are going to be the rebels who refuse to leave and declared Jihadist, diehard terrorists.
If this ends up being the case then it will be an embarrassment to the U.S. to concede that such a large number of bad guys existed all along. The State Dept has been telling the press and us that most of these guys were moderates. The press might have to go to a seminar for a few weeks to understand what happened, where all of these extremists came from, and learn the new talking points.
If the Turks actually concede this much territory to R+6, the Russians will probably let Turkey's air force operate in designated areas. I read on Southfront that there was an airstrike on the PYD.
If the Russians accepted anything less than this, it would be foolish and would likely create a new rift with the Iranians.
Posted by: Chris Chuba | 06 September 2016 at 02:14 PM
Chris Chuba
Diplomacy is BS and illusion. Anything can be constructed out of the "ether." the Turkish occupation zone will be a "moderate" indoian reservation. they will be exterminated elsewhere. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 06 September 2016 at 02:21 PM
All
Someone points out to me that on one occasion a few small trucks of fruit and vegetables made it through the SW breach. Well, my hat's off to them. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 06 September 2016 at 02:29 PM
Putin and Lavrov always defeat Obama and Kerry, but always let the latter have some kind of face saving pseudo-deal in negotiations in order to sell the deal to the Borg or US public. Over the next 2 months, the R6 will try to seal the deal in Aleppo, create other military realities around Idlib and Hama, let the Turks nail the coffin of Kurdish ambitions, and then make a 'deal' with Obama and Kerry that lets the latter look they achieved something. The R6 approach will be remembered as the real substance of any 'diplomacy' that winds down the war...unless HRC wins and engages in very reckless behavior.
Posted by: jeremy C | 06 September 2016 at 02:39 PM
There was one photo shot from an overpass of three small trucks with fruits "showing them driving into east-Aleppo". I am 98% sure that the picture was NOT shot in Aleppo. Way too good quality, light and scene setting to be real.
Posted by: b | 06 September 2016 at 02:57 PM
b
About the three trucks, that makes sense. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 06 September 2016 at 03:10 PM
I'm sure you're right that nothing much made it into East Aleppo. The question that I had is the balance of forces. Could the jihadis open the road again? b has told us that bombing has destroyed much of the rebel support base, and many jihadis have been killed. Do you agree? The Syrians are obviously limited in the number of offensively capable forces they have. What happens if they're called away to another battle?
Posted by: Laguerre | 06 September 2016 at 03:39 PM
Laguerre
"b has told us that bombing has destroyed much of the rebel support base, and many jihadis have been killed. Do you agree?" I do. IMO the rebels have lost so much in this effort that the correlation of forces now favors R+6. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 06 September 2016 at 03:50 PM
I'm very concerned that the disrespect Obama experienced in China and the humiliation Joe Biden suffered in Turkey are a sign of things to come. I see this insulting behavior as a direct result of our failed, interventionist foreign policy which, as you point out, is backfiring spectacularly.
Do you think a noninterventionist candidate like Trump, can help us change directions and get back on track or are we doomed to make the same mistakes for the foreseeable future?
Posted by: plantman | 06 September 2016 at 04:16 PM
Obama's "legacy?" What a joke!
If you were to take a poll of Americans outside the Capital Beltway and ask them how many care at all whether Assad is removed from power, my guess is that the number of affirmatives would be within the +/- margin of error of ZERO.
It is truly amazing how much butchery and slaughter America either engages in or supports around the world while the vast majority of its citizens exist if a haze of technodouchebaggery, mindlessly playing Pokemon GO and the aptly named fantasy football.
Posted by: Karl Kolchack | 06 September 2016 at 04:23 PM
Laguerre
If by "their base" you mean their base in Turkey, I would agree with b. If you mean their various logistical forward bases in syria I would also agree with b. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 06 September 2016 at 04:36 PM
Karl Kolchak.
Most Americans IMO do not really know where England is. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 06 September 2016 at 04:38 PM
plantman
I think that a non-interventionist president who conducts himself or herself with dignity and who does not insist on having foreign enemies could do much for our status among the nations of the world. That does not mean I am in favor of allowing the North Koreans or anyone else to spit on us. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 06 September 2016 at 04:41 PM
Just wondering which wholesale market they went to buy the pristine foods? The story doesn't add up
Posted by: Midan | 06 September 2016 at 05:36 PM
Hopefully, the biggest losers in this entire affair are the Western MSM. They have been entirely discredited in their reporting of Syria and the Ukraine. That in itself would make it harder for the next idiot in the White House or the State Department to unleash the dogs of war.
Posted by: gonefishing | 06 September 2016 at 05:42 PM
CC: The rebels in the South are collapsing, so, of course, this: https://twitter.com/DovLieber/status/772505410242838528.
Posted by: Matthew | 06 September 2016 at 05:44 PM
Col.,
In my experience, they have a rough idea of where it is, but they do not care about it geographically, politically, economically or in any other dimension. The same can be said even more so in regard to other countries and regions. I base this anecdotal response on our American families' and friends' ignorance of the ongoing events of where we live, Greece, or events in the region and this part of the world let alone further afield in Asia and Africa.
Posted by: Haralambos | 06 September 2016 at 05:52 PM
Col: Since even the jihadis seem to have drones now, I do not understand why the SAA doesn't send drones out in front of armor to locate ATGM before the armor gets in range.
Posted by: Matthew | 06 September 2016 at 06:43 PM
There is a plausible political strategy for a President Hillary to fudge an American failure in Syria:herald the success in bringing down ISIL as it gradually comes apart while ignoring all matters Syrian. ISIL is recognizable to Americans; nothing in Syria is. Of course, we will have to do it pretty much on our own. Erdogan may cut most support but cannot be expected to attack them given the threat of a terrorist response.
Russia will limit itself to the few areas where ISIL is an impediment to consolidation of the Assad regime. The Kurds have no reason to be our mercenaries for payment in political Bitcoin. Therefore, a long drawn out process - but success nonetheless. As for Syria,it will get in the papers only infrequently: an annual Christmas Day editorial in the NYT,"Have we forgotten Syria?" and a graphic NGO report played up by Kristoff on the tribulations of Aleppo's transgender community.
Posted by: mbrenner | 06 September 2016 at 07:17 PM
Colonel FYI latest election polls Show the presidential race is dead even, with DT gaining new voters, sounds like the Borg Queen is "coughing" her chance away.
Posted by: Kooshy | 06 September 2016 at 07:24 PM