By Patrick BAHZAD
It is basically happening as you are reading this post. The SAA has launched further operations in Northern Aleppo which could prove decisive in cutting off what is left of the rebel forces of NW Syria from their LOCs and bases in Turkey. This new offensive had been building up for the past few days. The only thing uncertain was which main direction it would take ...
Well, it looks like the SAA and its allies decided and try and open the way to the Zubl and Zaara enclave, a small Shia area North-West of Aleppo that has been encircled for quite some time. The move into Zubl, which is actually a two pronged offensive, as the troops inside the enclave are also pushing towards SAA lines, will cut off the rebels' main LOC towards Azaz, the border-post to Turkey, thus preventing any resupply in manpower, weapons and ammunition getting into Aleppo, or Idlib, from that direction.
In combination with another ongoing operation aimed at retaking the power plant East of Aleppo, currently in the hands of ISIS, it is clear that the R+6 is going for a decisive move in that area. The nature of the terrain, which favours combined arms by large armoured troops much more than in mountainous Latakia, should give the R+6 a large advantage, considering in particular the rebels' depleted ATGM stock and the increasing use of electronic countermeasures and devices by SAA armour (as announced already in November on SST).
As the R+6 are moving forward in Latakia province as well, closing in on the border to Turkey, the new offensive in Northern Aleppo constitutes pretty much the Eastern component of a large pincer move that will aim at isolating Aleppo and closing in on Idlib, with the overall objective being to crush whatever is left of the rebel forces in a modern version of a "Kesselschlacht". Should the junction be made with Nubl and Zaara, no doubt the next thrust will be towards Bab al-Hawa, the main border-post West of Aleppo. And if this happens, the noose around the rebels neck will be so tight, that only face-saving negotiations and compromise in Geneva will possibly save them from military destruction.
That would leave the question of ISIS and the Kurdish involvement in the war wide open. Currently, YPG militias control much of the border to Turkey, in particular the area of Afrin. They have been involved in major battles against ISIS as well as sporadic fighting against Turkmen and other rebel groups East of Afrin. If these groups are cut off from Aleppo and Idlib, they will probably have to move back into Turkey and hope for Turkish military support in order to survive. The rebels' lifeline in Northern Syria would be lost though, either to R+6 or Kurdish YPG.
What would happen next is open to conjecture, but other than the predictable "Kesselschlacht" around Idlib, it is likely that R+6 military efforts would also focus even more on ISIS. The Jihadi throat-cutters are probably not looking forward to developments over the days to come, as they risk being next in line for a decisive military action. Anything West of the Euphrates might be up for grabs if the R+6 and YPG decide to go for it, and ISIS might lose its grip on these territories.
Interesting days ahead, stay put …
Pepe Escobar: http://www.globalresearch.ca/you-have-now-landed-in-geneva-syria/5504855
"Ankara’s game is three-pronged; prop up their heavily battered Turkmen proxies; keep very much alive the corridor to Aleppo – a corridor that crucially includes the Jihadi Highway between Turkey and Syria; and most of all prevent by all means necessary that YPG Kurds bridge the gap from Afrin to Kobani and unite all three Syrian Kurd cantons near the Turkish border. None of this has anything to do with fighting ISISL/ISIL/Daesh. And the nuttiest part is that Washington is actually assisting the Syrian Kurds with air support. Either the Pentagon supports the Syrian Kurds or Erdogan’s invasion of northern Syria; schizophrenia does not apply here."
Posted by: annamaria | 02 February 2016 at 08:14 AM
"'We sent new fighters this morning, we sent heavier equipment there. It seems it will be a decisive battle in the north God willing,' said Ahmed al Seoud, head of a Free Syrian Army group known as Division 13. 'We sent TOW missile platforms. We sent everything there,' he told Reuters."
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-idUSKCN0VB1CQ
Grinding . . . grinding . . . grinding . . .
Posted by: D | 02 February 2016 at 08:18 AM
All
One can only hope that the fractured rebel commands will push more materiel forward into the "kettle" even while much of the detritus of the rebel forces is trying to withdraw into Turkey covered by Turkish Army artillery while doing so. IMO Turkey will be careful to keep its air force out of this rather than face combat with the Russian aerospace forces involved. A link-up of YPG forces and R+6 in eastern Aleppo seems inevitable. That will contribute to logistical and oil export isolation of IS everywhere east of Aleppo City. One wonders what LTG McFarland thinks of all this and how tight the restrictions are for his ability to cooperate with R+6. Lastly, as Clausewitz wrote in his short chapter on "The Military Character of an Army," the habit of victory breeds victory. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 02 February 2016 at 08:45 AM
Syrian civil war: Could Turkey be gambling on an invasion?
Kurdish forces, close to sealing the border, must beware - President Erdogan is unpredictable
"Turkey could respond to this by accepting a fait accompli, conceding that it would be difficult for it to send its army into northern Syria in the face of strong objections from the US and Russia. But, if the alternative is failure and humiliation, then it may do just that. Gerard Chaliand, the French expert on irregular warfare and the politics of the Middle East, speaking in Erbil last week, said that 'without Erdogan as leader, I would say the Turks would not intervene militarily [in northern Syria], but, since he is, I think they will do so'."
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/syrian-civil-war-could-turkey-be-gambling-on-an-invasion-a6844171.html
Posted by: D | 02 February 2016 at 08:51 AM
It looks like T-90's are in use in the assault on Tell Jibbin.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p1TwfUjczHk&feature=youtu.be
Posted by: Poul | 02 February 2016 at 09:19 AM
Other tanks seem fitted with anti ATGM counter measures:
https://youtu.be/lJMzB_51rDo?t=13
This channel appear to follow the offensive quite closely:
https://www.youtube.com/user/militarymediasy/videos
Posted by: jld | 02 February 2016 at 10:02 AM
https://twitter.com/EjmAlrai/status/694540198730940417
/quote/
Elijah J. Magnier @EjmAlrai
#Damascus said:"All communication and supply line between #Turkey and norther reef #Aleppo is cut now. #Syria.
/endquote/
Posted by: b | 02 February 2016 at 10:58 AM
Russia's surprise http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/war-in-syria-russia-s-rustbucket-military-delivers-a-hi-tech-shock-to-west-and-israel-a6842711.htmlto the West .
Posted by: John H | 02 February 2016 at 11:15 AM
I registered Pepe a long time ago, as worth reading ...
Almost forgot about him by now, except we have a Paul Escobar around here. Thus annamaria, thanks for the link.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepe_Escobar
Does anyone else experience problems with Firefox around here, by the way?
Posted by: LeaNder | 02 February 2016 at 11:23 AM
Ok, had to shift again, "browserwise":
Empire of Chaos
http://atimes.com/category/empire-of-chaos/
Posted by: LeaNder | 02 February 2016 at 11:40 AM
Supplementary map: ( Highly salted with propaganda, I know)
http://southfront.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/V1isOXi.jpg
From :
http://southfront.org/map-the-battle-for-aleppo-the-mother-of-all-battles/
A little video from same source:
http://southfront.org/international-military-review-syria-feb-2-2016/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
What a difference 10 months makes.
"I can't tell you if the use of force in Iraq today would last five days, or five weeks, or five months, but it certainly isn't going to last any longer than that."
--Donald Rumsfeld, November 14, 2002
"It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months"
-- Donald Rumsfeld, February 7, 2003
"I think it will go relatively quickly. Weeks rather than months."
-- Dick Cheney, March 16, 2003
"No one is talking about occupying Iraq for five to ten years."
-- Richard Perle, March 9, 2003
Posted by: sd | 02 February 2016 at 11:43 AM
Here is a presentation from yesterday, 1 February, by the Russian military about Syria. Clicking on the 'cc' button should display the English subtitles--
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dw0xx3pLfnY
Posted by: robt willmann | 02 February 2016 at 12:03 PM
All
When President Assad is done with the Liver Eaters I think he should ask BiBi for Syria's illegally occupied Golan Heights back ...
Posted by: alba etie | 02 February 2016 at 12:07 PM
AE,
Perhaps he should just open a refugee center there to be the humanitarian at heart that the world doesn't know.
Posted by: Fred | 02 February 2016 at 12:24 PM
How long could the jihadists last with no supplies and reinforcements? It would seem that some may decide it's not yet time for the virgins and surrender. In the recent past the jihadists who left areas were bused to Idlib. That doesn't look like the best destination for them any more.
Posted by: Jack | 02 February 2016 at 12:29 PM
Had NATO states and the Russian Federation agreed on a step-by-step political program for settling the war in Palestine, at the pain of war with Russia, Israel could have been issued an ultimatum to leave the Golan Heights as the first step in ending that war.
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 02 February 2016 at 12:30 PM
b
Yes, it is reported that the jaws north of Aleppo have closed. The rebels will ty to break through that as well as continue their attempts to get out of the encirclement and into Turkey. The objective should be to prevent that and to inflict as many casualties as possible in the process. I expect that the east Lattakia Front will start to collapse when the reality of the encirclement sets in. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 02 February 2016 at 12:44 PM
Thanks for the link! FYI, since the URL blended into the word "to" at the end, you have to delete those two letters off the end of the URL for it to work (link should end as .html NOT .htmlto).
Unfortunately it's a common problem that either punctuation (esp. ".") or extra letters or a 'space' get added into or on the the end of a URL making the link a deadend, though it's easily fixable if you pay attention and edit out the offending characters.
Posted by: Valissa | 02 February 2016 at 12:57 PM
from my own established nitwit assumptions: The Golan Heights seem a much more difficult terrain then the more visible "Occupied Territories", although yes, in the larger getting-rid-of-Assad-association this may be an issue. Not least since nitwits like me__(?cold war remnants, Baath?)__ are familiar with Palestine versus Judea and Samaria, vaguely of the "Terra incognita" theory, but don't usually connect it to the Golan Heights versus Jordanian's more prominent part in post 1967 matters.
Maybe I don't notice, if I do not find the respective mirror? Sometimes even overdo in finding one. On the other hand, 2001 seems to have been the start of my obsession with mirrors, minus minor precursors, like double standards.
My puzzle still is how Turkey got involved in Syria more recently.
Any idea?
Posted by: LeaNder | 02 February 2016 at 01:13 PM
Fred: Behind your comment is a very serious question: What does Syria do with all the rebels who tried to collapse the government? Would any country on either allow "refugees" to return who were engaged in an armed rebellion--at least in the short-term?
Posted by: Matthew | 02 February 2016 at 01:22 PM
Some of the youtube videos posted in the last 24 hours seem to show rebel pickups with their guns removed, but the vehicle largely intact. I am wondering if they may have run out of fuel and been abandoned.
Posted by: bth | 02 February 2016 at 01:26 PM
Rebels collapsing. Call in the lawyers! See https://twitter.com/KenRoth/status/694583831471484929
Posted by: Matthew | 02 February 2016 at 01:26 PM
Richard Armistead is reputed to have told the leader of Pakistan after 9/11/01 either you are with US or against US. My guess is it might be time to spell out our policy clearly in Syria now! It would start with informing Turkey that they will soon have the Russians permanently on several borders. Do they care? Do we care?
Posted by: William R. Cumming | 02 February 2016 at 01:42 PM
Stupidity.
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 02 February 2016 at 01:52 PM
armitage
Posted by: raksh wah | 02 February 2016 at 01:57 PM