Far to the east of Damascus, a hundred kilometers beyond Palmyra, lies Deir az-Zour, the largest city in eastern Syria. It sits on the Euphrates River deep in the heart of the Islamic State. It’s been a battlefield since November 2012 and has been surrounded by IS forces since mid-2014. The front lines of the pocket have seldom remained static. Periodic IS offensives make some inroads most often driven back by SAA counteroffensives.
Desperate for something to crow about, IS moved 2,000 or so of its fighters from other fronts to launch its latest attempt to take Deir az-Zour earlier this month. It succeeded in taking some ground including an army supply base and most of a neighborhood in the north and an air defense missile base in the south. With the considerable help of Russian airstrikes, including TU-22M3 strategic bombers flying from Russia, the SAA defenders of Deir az-Zour blunted the IS offensive and are slowly retaking some of the lost terrain.
The press has picked up on one aspect of this latest round of fighting. Depending on which source you listen to, IS fighters have kidnapped up to 400 civilians as hostages from the areas they captured and have killed at least 135 and up to 280 people. Some 80 of those killed were captured SAA soldiers and pro-government militiamen. The truth may be closer to scores of victims rather than hundreds.
The forces in the pocket consist of the 104th Airborne Brigade of the Republican Guards and the 137th Artillery Brigade of the 17th Reserve Division, some units of the National Defense Forces (NDF), and militia from the Shaytat Tribesmen. These soldiers have not just seen the elephant, they have watched the herd pass by time after time. They are hardened fighters. Their commander is Major General Issam Zahreddine, a Druze from Tarba. His nickname is the Lion of the Republican Guard. He was posted to Deir az-Zour in November 2013 and left only to lead the defense of Hasakah in August 2015 before returning to Deir az-Zour. He leads from the front and is clearly an inspirational and competent leader. His son is also in the 104th.
In my assessment, Deir az-Zour will not fall, especially with Russian and Syrian air support. The military airport is still open and functioning for resupply. It will remain a thorn in the side of IS until the R+6 forces can lift the siege. The SAA refuses to cede the initiative and continues to threaten the IS north-south and east-west LOCs.
Here is a video of fighting in the pocket. It gives a good sense of the situation. General Zahreddine figures prominently and appears to enjoy taking a few shots at the jihadists himself. The final battle sequence shows close fighting with hand grenades. Clearly there are no slackers or shirkers here.
For more detailed coverage of fighting in the Deir az-Zour pocket, I recommend Al-Masdar News, a pro-Assad paper based in Lebanon. The paper’s editor in chief is Leith Abou Fadel, sometimes referred to as Assad’s pitbull. Despite his obvious bias, his reports are informative and factual. Here’s some of his recent writings.
ISIS launches new attack on the Deir Ezzor Airport (1 Jan 2016)
ISIS suffers 70+ casualties in Deir Ezzor today: report (19 Jan 2016)
Complete battle update from Deir Ezzor (20 Jan 2016)
Complete battle update from Deir Ezzor (25 Jan 2016)
ISIS launches massive assault in Deir Ezzor (26 Jan 2016)
ISIS retreats after sustaining heavy losses in Deir Ezzor (28 Jan 2016)
Attended a CFR panel discussion on the Syria Peacetalks. Cited below, an interesting watch with Amb James Dobbins, Philip Gordon and Kimberly Kagan. Let each make his own opinion, but I thought it was more pragmatic that I would have expected. Surprised by Kagan's comment that events on the ground will shape the future more than peace talks in Geneva. Perhaps she has been reading this blog
http://www.cfr.org/syria/update-syria-peace-talks/p37474
Posted by: oofda | 28 January 2016 at 09:08 PM
TTG, Sir
Would you know why the Syrian army have kept this surrounded pocket deep in IS territory and so far east from their main areas? It seems their previous strategy was to fall back and defend their western territory.
Of course now with the Russian intervention they have moved back to offense. It seems that tactical change took place under the direction of the Russians through the R+6 command center.
http://fortruss.blogspot.nl/2016/01/russia-allies-prepare-new-decisive.html?m=1
Posted by: Jack | 28 January 2016 at 09:48 PM
I followed your recommendation and took a look at the video. Reactions: 1)Knowledge of Syrian situation in all its dimensions was thin. Actually, Kagan is the best informed. 2) US-centric (and great power-centric) to a degree reminiscent of the Cold War take on the Congo as if Lumumba were the next Mao. 3) These four people (Kagan aside) are reputed to be among the best we have. It's akin to choosing the MVP of the Philadelphia 76ers.
Tragic.
Posted by: mbrenner | 28 January 2016 at 09:56 PM
BTW the TU-22M3 is one of the aircraft that is known to be fitted with the GLONASS controlled SVP-24 guidance system which means that with ground spotters it's at least as accurate as artillery. I read a story in the MSM that made it sound like the Russians were carpet bombing the city with B17's which is absurd since most of it is held by Syrian troops. In a pocket that is roughly 5 miles wide and long and packed with your own troops you cannot afford to have wildly inaccurate carpet bombing. I wish the MSM would use a little common sense; hope springs eternal.
If the ISIS has to abandon their attacks it will be a great victory for the Syrian troops and the remaining civilians who don't want to be subject to their horrors. Such an outcome would cause far more harm to ISIS than the shallow victory at Ramadi but will be ignored by the U.S. and E.U. MSM. It's likely that ISIS already has suffered more harm at Deir az-Zour than at Ramadi.
Posted by: Chris Chuba | 28 January 2016 at 09:59 PM
Jack,
Think of this as a Syrian Bastogne. It serves the same purpose. Holding Deir az-Zour impedes IS freedom of action and saps its resources. Additionally, I would imagine Assad is not willing to give up another provincial capital without a damned good fight.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 28 January 2016 at 10:04 PM
Sir
That makes sense. IS sure are using up resources to attack this pocket. It must be a tough tour for those in the Syrian army who get assigned that front. What type of surveillance would work best in that area? It would seem that if there are drones providing aerial videos and photos that the SAA would have the ability to more effectively counter these attacks.
Posted by: Jack | 28 January 2016 at 10:22 PM
TTG
Deir az-Zour. This reminds me of Jubal Early's decision to fight at Cedar Creek in late 1864. He decided to attack at odds of 1 to 3 because he could not bring himself to a decision to subject his people to further Yankee depredations south of there in the Shenandoah Valley. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 28 January 2016 at 10:40 PM
Jack,
IDK man. I see that and think "those lucky sons a bitches". There's something to be said for getting the chance to maul your bitter foe and see him break against you like the waves do the rocks.
Posted by: Tyler | 28 January 2016 at 11:08 PM
I neglected to mention one further lapse in the foursome's grasp of the Syrian situation. They all agreed that Putin sees Russia's primary interest there as sea and air bases. Again, a 1970s perspective - Latakia to support a Soviet strike at NATO's soft underbelly. In fact, Putin's overriding interest by far is to forestall Syria, or part of it, becoming a permanent base for Islamic terrorist attacks in Russia. Have we forgotten the Chechens and the thousands killed in Russia proper? Chechen units, and others from Muslim enclaves in Russia, are prominent in the AQ/al-Nusra coalition. Unless they are eliminated, and the establishment of a safe zone prevented, their intervention will be considered a failure. The CFR policy paper that served as a reference point for the discussion, calls for a ceasefire in place with a northern zone encompassing al-Nusra etc. to be "protected" by Saudi Arabia and Turkey who are supposed to guarantee al-Nusra and Ahrar al- Sham's good behavior in a prolonged process of political reconciliation.
Strobe Talbott, the moderator, began his career as a high powered Moscow correspondent. It seems well past time that he polished his shuffleboard stick and headed south.
Posted by: mbrenner | 28 January 2016 at 11:19 PM
There are some 200,000 pro government people in the city. Many associated with the army or state. It's not just a small village. It would have been catastrophic for morale if the city had been given up.
Posted by: b | 28 January 2016 at 11:39 PM
b
IMO you have it right. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 29 January 2016 at 12:13 AM
MBrenner- correct- I was going to further comment on the Russian situation. Having been posted in Moscow in the 90's, I can attest to the fear and loathing of the Chechens by Russians.
The Chechen mafiya was prevalent in Moscow then- and hated and feared. Then came Chechnya. Further, recent incidents in the Russian south- such as in Dagestan- demonstrate the threat to Russia. Their reason for being in Syria is not just for naval and air bases, important as they may be- it is to stop the Islamic jihadist movement before it moves further into Russia. One of the problems of many of the elites, is that they have absolutely no clue as to what the concerns of the other sides are. The concerns of Russians about ISIS are real.
Posted by: oofda | 29 January 2016 at 12:23 AM
Talking about Bastogne... go to 1:53.. (from Latakia)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMdzvE5gBso
Posted by: FkDahl | 29 January 2016 at 01:55 AM
TTG, Sir
I'm not sure if you saw this Reuters report that the YPG is getting ready to attack IS close to the Turkish border.
http://www.businessinsider.com/syrian-kurds-are-planning-a-big-attack-on-an-isis-controlled-portion-of-turkeys-border-2016-1
Posted by: Jack | 29 January 2016 at 03:14 AM
Tyler
You may like these recent videos from the Latakia front.
https://youtu.be/uMdzvE5gBso
https://youtu.be/JlaMjo8rJ6w
Posted by: Jack | 29 January 2016 at 03:17 AM
Am I correct that in the aggregate the Russian buildup in Syria continues?
Posted by: William R. Cumming | 29 January 2016 at 07:21 AM
It is not deep in ISIS territory. Everything west of it is deep desert and completely uninhabited and the only good road through that desert goes from Deir-az-zour to Damascus
Posted by: charly | 29 January 2016 at 09:06 AM
Jack: At least the Syrian opposition is taking a principled stand. They will boycott the peace conference until the Russians and Assad stop bombing civilians. And by "civilians" they include civilians driving tanks or carrying automatic weapons or beheading the local Alawite/Shia apostate.
Posted by: Matthew | 29 January 2016 at 09:54 AM
TTG you might want to read this:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/29/syria-moderate-opposition-president-assad-islamic-state-regime-isis
As their military situation gets worse the propaganda ramps up. There's probably an equation to express it somewhere.
Hmmm let D = imminent defeat and D² = desperation.
PS: The comments make for much more worthwhile reading than the article.
P(ropaganda) = D.D²/1
Or something.
Surrender or our unicorns will gore you!
One hell of a battle cry no?
Posted by: Dubhaltach | 29 January 2016 at 10:11 AM
PS: Oops sorry, I meant to add that Asaad Hanna the author of the Guardian CIF article I linked to is a journalist living in Istanbul. Does anyone know what the Turkish for "What's all this 'we' business paleface?" is?
Posted by: Dubhaltach | 29 January 2016 at 10:24 AM
In reply to Matthew 29 January 2016 at 09:54 AM
You forgot to mention the civilians riding explosive laden unicorns that detonate themselves whenever the come close to unarmed civilians.
Posted by: Dubhaltach | 29 January 2016 at 10:41 AM
Would a link to something like this help lighten the mood over at the Graun as well?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIOMZI50wJk
"Bir Gizli Yalan Söyle" - "Tell a hidden lie"
But yep, indeed. The propaganda-line is getting leaps and bounds more laughable, on AJE-TV too. I'll concede that AJE's Michael Bays had the good grace to let opposition that is not Riyadh's clown-show have their say in Geneva a couple days back. A PYD-rep included, interestingly enough, who is present despite there officially being no invitation, supposedly.
Posted by: Barish | 29 January 2016 at 10:41 AM
Many thanks for that excellent report, TTG.
Posted by: Tony Papert | 29 January 2016 at 10:42 AM
Off topic, but an item that is not found on US MSM (goes without saying that readers here want to be informed)
http://www.thejournal.ie/paris-staff-angry-at-fake-bomb-discovery-2571299-Jan2016/
The US gov was caught red-handed shipping terrorist bombs to be distributed thru Tunisia.
Everready with a contingency plan some spokes person knew just what to say:
"training exercise"
Recall a similar incident in Tel Aviv. Mossad was caught planting a bomb under a car. Official explanation: "training exercise"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8377746.stm
ps.
Wasn't there a training exercise happening on 9/11 ?
Have heard it suggested a zillion times that the training exercise was there to create "fog" and foul up our defenses. It just occurred to me now that perhaps there was a fall back plan if the terrorist attacks were aborted and some visible residue/evidence had to be explained away: "training exercise".
Posted by: Jag Pop | 29 January 2016 at 12:25 PM
"On Jan. 26, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov held an important year-in-review press conference before an audience of about 150 journalists, including the BBC correspondent Steve Rosenberg and many other well-known representatives of mainstream Western media:
http://www.mid.ru/en/posledniye_dobavlnenniye/-/asset_publisher/MCZ7HQuMdqBY/content/id/2032328
"...not a single report of the event has yet appeared on major online American, French, British and German newspaper portals or television channels... Regarding a similar news blackout that followed another major Russian press briefing, the sharp-tongued Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova commented, what are all these accredited Western reporters doing in Moscow if nothing gets published abroad? Do they have some other occupation?"
https://consortiumnews.com/2016/01/29/a-russian-diplomats-take-on-the-world/
Ouch.
Posted by: annamaria | 29 January 2016 at 12:52 PM