« Hillary is still triangulating | Main | Dabiq, the end of days (notional), and jihadi goals »

20 November 2015


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

And the point is? Why should either the US or Europe accept refugees, when the closest countriesboth geographically and culturallywon't take a single one?

And yes, 10,000 refugees is far fewer than being forced on Europe. But the issue is risk of infiltration, not the total number.

Sure, the GOP is milking the irrational fear for all it's worth (and in America, that's a lot). But let's not go too far in the other direction.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

My Photo

January 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by Typepad