"The journey has taken more than nine years. New Horizons launched from Cape Canaveral atop an Atlas V rocket in 2006, after a speedy four-year construction. Prior to that, the so-called Pluto Underground spent more than 15 years trying to get NASA to greenlight the project. Since launch, the small probe has traveled for 3,463 days and 2.97 billion miles—about 32 times the distance between the Earth and the sun. When New Horizons left, a Super Nintendo game offered better resolution than our best images of Pluto. Though the best are still to come, the probe already has sent back color pictures measured in megapixels."
"But this is mere icing. The rest of the cake won’t come out of the oven for another 18 months. Downlink speed is slow—about two kilobytes per second—and it takes four hours for a signal to reach Earth. So far, New Horizons has only sent back the tiniest fraction of the data it will collect. But let’s take a moment to revel in all we’ve learned so far. During the last few days, New Horizons has treated us to increasingly detailed images of the geography on Pluto’s surface. Astronomers didn’t even know Pluto's true size until yesterday. “We are already seeing complex and nuanced surfaces that tell us of history of these two bodies that is beyond our wildest dreams on the science team,” says Alan Stern, the mission’s principal investigator." (Wired)
****************************************
As a child in the 1960s, I was enthralled with space travel and the race to the moon. I and my young friends drew detailed plans for spaceships, built models of Mercury, Gemini and Apollo spacecraft and imagined being on spaceflights to other planets. Every time there is a major spaceflight event like the flyby of Pluto, the embers of hope and excitement of my youthful obsession with space are rekindled.
As far as major spaceflight events go, this is a doozy. We haven’t explored a planet (or dwarf planet… thanks, Neil DeGrasse Tyson) since Voyager 2 buzzed Neptune in 1989. New Horizons gave everybody a scare on the 4th of July when the Johns Hopkins APL lost telemetry with the craft. It was an Apollo 13 moment. This is exciting stuff.
I think Neil DeGrasse Tyson said it well when he tweeted, ”Were it not for NASA & kindred programs of discovery, I wonder what hope would remain for our species to rise above itself.” I also got a chuckle when he admitted, “I wrote “The Pluto Files” book in recovery after years of hate-mail from school children.”
http://www.wired.com/2015/07/pluto-new-horizons-2/
TTG
Thanks TTG for this POST and Congrats to NASA! I forget is PLUTO a planet still?
Posted by: William R. Cumming | 14 July 2015 at 03:57 PM
WRC,
No, it's considered a dwarf planet because of it's size... about the size of our moon. Pluto was defined out of planethood in 2006 by a vote of the International Astronomical Union. It caused quite a stir among us nerds back then.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 14 July 2015 at 04:11 PM
TTG,
I think Pluto was declared dwarf planet because it has not "sufficiently" cleared the debris in its orbit and not because of its size. The three rules for a body in solar system to be categorized as a planet are
1) Has to be spherical (requires a certain mass)
2) Has to be in orbit around Sun (Pluto's orbit is elliptical but it is still in orbit)
3) Has to sufficiently clear the debris in its orbit.(Pluto and Charon both revolve around a center of revolution that lies outside of Pluto)
here is the IAU's definition
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAU_definition_of_planet
Posted by: Farooq | 14 July 2015 at 04:39 PM
Makes this old Martin Marietta/Lockheed Martin employee feel good. We just needed the Dead singing What A Long Strange Trip It's Been as the craft sailed past Pluto.
Posted by: BabelFish | 14 July 2015 at 06:41 PM
The insufficient cleared is the excuse. The real reason is that Pluto isn't the largest of its type as Eris is bigger and that there are probably hundreds of those round, rocky minor planets circling the sun. (they already found dozens big enough to be round.) So the choice was between demoting Pluto or adding Eris + any other planet bigger than Pluto (probably non-zero) and the size of Pluto is itself a very arbitrary number.
Posted by: charly | 14 July 2015 at 06:59 PM
Latest observations from New Horizon have provided more accurate diameter of Pluto's which makes it bigger than Eris.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/13/us-space-pluto-idUSKCN0PN2B620150713
However you are right that if Pluto was kept as planet then it would have been hard to not classify other "plutoids" as planets without causing confusion.
Posted by: Farooq | 14 July 2015 at 08:35 PM
But Eris is heavier and that calculation is easy for any system with a moon so it is unlike to change much while diameter is hard with reflectiveness of the surface more a guess than a measurement and Eris being so damn cold. IIRC the New Horizon found that the diameter of Pluto was 10% bigger but they didn't changes mass as the moon methode measurement is more precise than the measurement out of the fly-by
Posted by: charly | 14 July 2015 at 10:14 PM
TTG,
I have to disagree with Neil DeGrasse Tyson. He left out Sputnik and men like Yuri Gregarin, they did get the show on the road. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuri_Gagarin
Posted by: Fred | 14 July 2015 at 10:24 PM
Fred,
Perhaps Tyson would include Gagarin and Sputnik in the kindred programs of discovery. After all, it was just a tweet. But I agree with you. The early Soviet space program was pretty awesome. I was rereading the story of Laika a few days ago... inspiring and poignant at the same time. She led the way for Gagarin, Glenn and all the others. We owe dogs a lot more than we give them.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 14 July 2015 at 10:54 PM
Laika Star music video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHV_O_m75gI
I was trying to find an image of the Soviet cosmonauts with Laika at their feet, but here are some Laika statues:
https://www.google.com/search?q=laika+statue&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0CB4QsARqFQoTCOPbzICT3MYCFcwXkgodMDQGUA&biw=1020&bih=662#tbm=isch&q=laika+statue+cosmonauts
Posted by: SAC Brat | 14 July 2015 at 11:07 PM
I expected it to be all cratered up but neither Pluto or its moons appear to be particularly pock-marked in the way our moon is. Seems like it should be way too cold out there for much surface activity on planets and they would be so cold at assembly they would have little geothermic activity and it would fade quick. We judge surface age by how cratered it is and that is supposed to be an extremely old surface so...??
Posted by: Mark Logan | 14 July 2015 at 11:18 PM
Also,
Looks more like Snoopy to me.
Posted by: Mark Logan | 14 July 2015 at 11:19 PM
This is quite amazing for a lot of reasons. When New Horizons was launched, there was a 'launch window' of about 30 days in early 2006. If the launch could not be made during that time, a significant amount of time- in years- would pass before it could be launched again. The key was that the satellite would 'bounce' off the atmosphere of Jupiter, giving it an added impetus, like a thrown rock skipping off waves. Jupiter had to be aligned just so for the launch to employ the skip tactic. The longer the wait into the launch window, the longer the New Horizons would take to get to Pluto. I recall that if it took to the end of the launch window, it would add about two years to the time to reach Pluto. Amazing math and physics to figure this out. Also the New Horizons is powered by a generator powered by a radioactive-thermal generator (RTG). The satellite cannot be powered by solar power due to the distance from the sun. Fascinating stuff
Posted by: oofda | 15 July 2015 at 12:02 AM
A most riveting account from the history of soviet space program. Truly shows the true grit of their astronauts
http://arstechnica.com/science/2014/09/the-little-known-soviet-mission-to-rescue-a-dead-space-station/
Posted by: Farooq | 15 July 2015 at 12:09 AM
Yes the mass didn't change with new observations. Density is now thought to be less than what it was believed to be.
Given how "planets" vary from tiny to huge(varying from 0.05 times earth mass for Mercury to 318 times earth mass for Jupiter) and rocky to gas giants, it is really a catch all term and problematic. If someone says there is a planet around a star, that tells you very little except that there is an object in an orbit around that star. Not very useful in that sense.
Posted by: Farooq | 15 July 2015 at 12:19 AM
FYI, a tv special on the Pluto flyby images...
And when those historic images arrive on Earth, they are set to star in a new hour-long special, "Direct from Pluto: The First Encounter," premiering on the Science Channel on Wednesday, July 15 at 10 p.m. ET/PT.
http://www.sciencechannel.com/tv-shows/direct-from-pluto-first-encounter/about-direct-from-pluto-first-encounter/
Posted by: Valissa | 15 July 2015 at 12:55 AM
What is your real point, TTG? The conspicuous presence of the irrelevant deGrasse media person in your post matches your conspicuous absence when matters of black riot are being discussed, unless it is to present some aspect you see as a mitigating factor in favour of Ferguson rioters, Baltimore rioters, Freddie Gray, Michael Brown...
What is the tale here? You do not refer to the overwhelmingly white New Horizons team. The real people behind the deed is not of your interest, but a media figure with absolutely no weight in hard scientific matters is? Because he is sort of black, wanted Pluto out and had a dream? What's going on? You keep silent when things go wrong but tries to steal the show when things are good? With a buffoon?
You're not an ethnic activist, so what is the tale? Why do you behave as one?
Posted by: Anonymous | 15 July 2015 at 01:56 AM
I thought eccentricity was a big part of the decision to demote Pluto. All the major/"real" planets have much more circular orbits. Pluto's orbit is almost comet-like - it's perihelion is inside the orbit of Neptune. That makes Pluto seem more like the other junk-balls out there in the Kuiper belt that a Real Planet.
Posted by: elkern | 15 July 2015 at 09:04 AM
Anonymous,
That's what you take out of this simple post about a remarkable NASA achievement? That this is some secret dogwhistle kill YT message? That's just sad and a little unhinged. Leave it to you to extend the coming race war out to the edge of the solar system.
You see Tyson as nothing more than an overexposed media figure. Well, you're not alone in that assessment. Many share your opinion of him and his scientific views. It's only due to his oversized media presence that he became the public face of the "Pluto is not a planet" controversy. But I'm surprised you don't see him as an Uncle Tom for heaping such high praise on the predominantly white NASA. The nerve of him! He ain't no brother.
As far as my "tale" goes, I am neither obliged or inclined to comment on every controversy appearing in SST. I suppose I should feel flattered that you take such an avid interest in my opinions. I'm not. Read them or do not read them. It matters not to me.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 15 July 2015 at 11:06 AM
TTG,
Good points. Twitter does have a significant draw back of brevity. Neil DeGrasse Tyson has done a good job of keeping things in the public eye that would otherwise be lost in the business of our everyday lives.
Posted by: Fred | 15 July 2015 at 11:26 AM
Farooq,
Thanks for the link.
Posted by: Fred | 15 July 2015 at 11:29 AM
The Laika images bring back my sputnik memory. At the time my family resided in a small subdivision just off Route 1 and surrounded by woods in Woodbridge, VA. Soon after sputnik was in orbit the newspapers published information on when and where it would be visible. Armed with this information, my father took me out a woods road near our house at night to get away from lights so we could watch for sputnik. We were successful - which was most impressive for a wonky sixth-grader just beginning to read science fiction.
Sputnik opened up an exciting new world, leading to the first manned orbital flights - which seemed such a positive step forward for the world at that time. I remember my school interrupting classes by broadcasting Alan Shepard and John Glenn's launches over the school PA system.
One great aspect of SST is that it has once again has led to important, but long-forgotten memories!
Posted by: Joe100 | 15 July 2015 at 12:05 PM
The statue I was looking for was I think of the cosmonauts who lost their lives in the Soviet space program, and the statue has Laika with them. Google wasn't helping me and I couldn't find the name to find the Russian name to search with. There is a lot of interesting stuff to study from all Soviet research.
My friends and I were kids who were fascinated by the Apollo program. Even now we always try to think of all the contingencies aerospace parts and procedures can have as we work on airplanes. One skipped or bad step and your satellite might not make orbit.
We like to send each other NASA news as we find it, usually with a title "Is it a good day for NASA news? It's always a good day for NASA news!"
Posted by: SAC Brat | 15 July 2015 at 12:38 PM
All,
For those of you who have worked in government have you ever heard anything relating to the government's knowledge or lack of knowledge of UFO's and extraterrestrials?
Just curious.
Posted by: GulfCoastPirate | 15 July 2015 at 01:14 PM
TTG, in my study of american thought I found out that the enfatuation with psychotic savants is as american as the search for Hitler impersonators in foreign policy. In the case of black psychotic savants, there is the aggravating factor that people do think of them as possessing magical qualities. Maybe DeGrasse has more substance in him than I can see from afar.
The race war you mention can only be avoided if the setting up of blacks against whites and vice versa is ended. There is an intentional effort to make things worse, that goes beyond the manipulations for vote gain by the Democratic Party. I think that the media should be the one and only target in a so called race war. It could end tomorrow, if only people ceased to go after the innocent on both sides.
But the tale... I have the natural tendency of trying to understand someone by the kind of thought he consciouly avoid. Unhinged, as you say. Duality is important to me, so I look at the shadow of things to see if they are really there, poor Anonymous is given the holes of the cheese for meal. I think there is an important tale out there and I think people are important.
And I'm thankful I'm beyond the range. I see I overstepped in my eagerness. I apologize. I'm a nuisance... but at least I'm not asking about UFOs. Right now Babak has his UFO abductees list at hand and is watching those who dare volunteer something under GCP's inquiry. Can't be too careful!
Posted by: Anonymous | 15 July 2015 at 08:11 PM