"The primary international treaty against torture, the Convention against Torture, which the United States ratified in 1994, contains two key requirements. First, it bans torture, without exception, as well as other inhumane treatment. Second, it requires that torturers be prosecuted.
President Obama has been firm in stopping torture. On his second day in office, he ordered an end to the Bush administration’s “enhanced interrogation techniques” — a euphemism for torture — and the closure of the secret CIA detention centers where torture was carried out.
But Obama has utterly failed in the second requirement. He has flatly refused to investigate the torture, let alone prosecute those responsible. The sole exception was a limited inquiry into any CIA interrogations that exceeded what was authorized, but even then the investigators didn’t interview victims or recommend charges. The Senate intelligence committee report should lead the president to reexamine this refusal." Kenneth Roth in Washpost
------------------------
IMO Obama does not want to break his own toys anymore than Tiberias Caesar would have wished to do so. With regard to the Tormentors and their enablers, it should be clear that if you let them get away with it, their successors will do the same things. pl
Change we couldn't believe in. How crass this administration has become.
Posted by: BabelFish | 13 December 2014 at 02:31 PM
Well it works for Wall Street. . .
Posted by: Charles I | 13 December 2014 at 03:06 PM
From what I am seeing it is clear that America is not immune to the sad manners of operation seen in other countries. However, to keep our wonderful country above this sad state of affairs we need leaders who have the foundation and fortitude to get out of the ditch and operate in a manner that keeps our country where our forefathers had sought to establish and maintain. It looks now like we have started to go off the track. Come on leaders, let's get back to preserving American ideals and not see us slip into the ditch of no return.
Posted by: Stan Henning | 13 December 2014 at 03:16 PM
Charles I
I am here to oppose that. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 13 December 2014 at 04:35 PM
Stan, Paul Craig Roberts has a wonderful perspective on what I would call "American Ideals" http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2014/12/12/brink-war-economic-collapse-paul-craig-roberts/
Posted by: georgeg | 13 December 2014 at 04:48 PM
Yes, our education system must take considerable blame for the current state of affairs - education is more than learning details about different fields of work but also how to act as responsible citizens. We need to focus on this now - we appear to be already slipping into the mire!!!
Posted by: Stan Henning | 13 December 2014 at 04:50 PM
My first thought, too....
Posted by: sglover | 13 December 2014 at 04:52 PM
Does not accountability start at the top? Articles of Impeachment could be introduced whether or not conviction! What did he know and when did he know it?
Posted by: William R. Cumming | 13 December 2014 at 04:58 PM
It is rather apparent that the rule of law no longer exists. Government officials and oligarchs as well as favored corporations are exempt.
Only the American people can restore it. Do they have the will?
Posted by: Jack | 13 December 2014 at 05:16 PM
Col.,
"...if you let them get away with it, their successors will do the same things."
Yes sir. It can't be many steps to see this type of conduct used against our own citizens.
Posted by: Fred | 13 December 2014 at 05:22 PM
Colonel, TTG,
Did you see the Mother Jones article regarding it?
http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2014/12/cia-torture-report-abuses-rectal-feeding
Posted by: J | 13 December 2014 at 06:16 PM
In the Gunpowder Plot torture, generally forbidden by law as an investigatory tool, could only be used with the permission of the Sovereign. King James I obliged but urged only the gentlest of methods necessary to achieve the desired results.
Human progress appears to be tortuously slow.
Posted by: doug | 13 December 2014 at 06:17 PM
I wonder how many of those here remember these, since many of you are my age (65) or older:
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a080601coveredyourass
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_Iraq_Group
http://content.usatoday.com/communities
/theoval/post/2011/06/heck-of-a-job-brownie-calls-bush-inattentive-fratboy/1#.VIzFMHt8sZA
I also wonder how many young men and women volunteered and suffered for this folly or lost their homes and/or their parents' homes while Bush cleared his ranch of brush and Andy Card vacationed in Maine.
It would seem to me that house cleaning needs to start at the top.
Posted by: Haralambos | 13 December 2014 at 06:20 PM
Wasn't that the original intent of those supporting universal education? It wasn't to provide fodder for the job market.
Beware of the Common Core Standards and those that support them.
Posted by: cville reader | 13 December 2014 at 06:31 PM
I agree, house cleaning needs to start at the top. But it would appear that Obama's mercurial rise to the top occurred precisely because the inner circle supporting him knew that he would not lead. Not now, not ever.
And so the nation faces many crises--torturers run amok, banks run amok, spooks, neocons, defense contractors, etc. all run amok.
Meanwhile the President presides over the debacle. Occasionally he delivers a well crafted, well articulated speech. But, far from the halcyon mirage of "yes, we can," now he feeds the American people a steady diet of "no, we can't."
No, we can't enforce the law. No, we can't get the economy moving. No, we can't stay out of stupid wars.
Discontent is rising and is being openly expressed among opinion shapers closer and closer to the beltway elites. That the Washington Post allowed Roth's opinion to be published is significant. Meanwhile, Simon Johnson, former chief economist of the World Bank writes that "Citigroup will be broken up."
http://baselinescenario.com/2014/12/12/citigroup-will-be-broken-up/
Question is, has the noose tightened around the necks of this bunch of beltway bandits enough for them to see the error of their ways? Or will their hubris and pigheadedness simply lead to their taking us all down with them?
Posted by: JohnH | 13 December 2014 at 08:26 PM
I know Col. Lang is appalled at armed service personnel involvement in torture. Hopefully another profession will take a hard look at its members involvement: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/12/psychologists_role_in_the_cia_s_torture_why_these_medical_professionals.html?wpsrc=sh_all_dt_tw_top
But again I remember the old saying: A fish rots from the head down.
Posted by: dilbert dogbert | 13 December 2014 at 08:33 PM
In 2010 we had this debate, and the MSM ordained as fact that torturers who were just following orders are immune from legal consequences. Maybe the MSM will now change their minds about it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/10/us/politics/10johnsen.html?_r=0
quote:
"
Ms. Johnsen’s nomination had been closely watched because the Office of Legal Counsel has the power to tell the president and other executive officials whether actions would be lawful. Officials who rely on its secret opinions are essentially safe from prosecution — even if the office’s legal pronouncements are later deemed to be incorrect.
"
This idea of legal immunity still sticks in my craw. Where did this idea come from? Why and How was it promulgated in the media? Did the CIA operate a domestic media-influencing program similar to the (probably illegal) US military press-influencing program during Bush's term?
Posted by: crf | 13 December 2014 at 09:24 PM
Just like the administration before it. Reminds me of ending of Animal Farm except in this case the voters looked from Republican to Democrat and could not tell the difference.
Posted by: Nancy K | 14 December 2014 at 08:50 AM
Don't parents have some responsibility? It is easy to blame teachers or the educational system when citizens and politicians act poorly. We are all to blame; finger pointing is easy.
Posted by: Nancy K | 14 December 2014 at 08:53 AM
Politicians are spineless individuals that will say or do anything to further their personal agenda but they are generally smart enough to put individuals in charge of agencies to assume responsibilities. In the case of USA acts of torture there were seven individuals that accepted the responsibility as DCI since 2011 and it is they that should be prosecuted for these acts and let the chips fall as they may. Once this is achieved their successors will think twice before taking this country down that road again.
I'm heartened by a TV advertisement this morning where six experienced individuals in Interrogation spoke on the fact that Torture does not work.
Posted by: Bobo | 14 December 2014 at 10:15 AM
The sources of these rulings are discussed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torture_Memos
The key names are Yoo and Bybee. Their opinions led to the torture ("enhanced interrogation")being carried out off US soil, thus Guantanamo as the site. I am not a lawyer, but I was brought up to see torture as inherently evil, and I am old enough to recall the French suppression of rebels in Algeria. When the use of torture in this suppression became public knowledge in France, there was outrage leading to France abandoning its hold on Algeria.
I can also recall the Eichmann trial and Hannah Arendt's coverage of it along with her reference to "the banality of evil." This may also be of interest: http://www.simplypsychology.org/milgram.html.
Posted by: Haralambos | 14 December 2014 at 10:40 AM
Correction...2001 versus 2011
Posted by: Bobo | 14 December 2014 at 10:40 AM
Haralambos
IMO the French left Algeria because DeGaulle correctly decided that the time of Western empires was ended and that resistance is Algeria would begin again after a time. I just heard Yoo say on FZ GPS that Justice did not authorize the "techniques' used by CIA and that those who had done such things are "legally exposed." pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 14 December 2014 at 10:48 AM
You inspire us all, or me, at least.
Posted by: Charles I | 14 December 2014 at 11:41 AM
Col Lang,
I really don't have anything to add other than I believe that you and the other SST members are absolutely correct to demand justice. The perpetrators should be indicted, tried, and imprisoned for their crimes. The only other thing that I can say is that my heart is very heavy.
Kind regards,
Posted by: Charles Dekle | 14 December 2014 at 12:24 PM