(The Purple Assed Mandrill of Peace speaks again)
Afghanistan as presently configured by the US, has 200,000 men under arms. This costs about $11.6 billion. Afghanistan's GDP is about $45 billion. A lot of that is created by massive foreign aid driven projects. The country's biggest cash crop and foreign exchange earner is opium poppies. The army and police lost over 4,000 killed this year, a year admittied to be the bloodiest in a long time. Do the arithmetic, folks, do the arithmetic.
Barry McCaffery was on the tube this AM explaining to ayman muhi ad-din (nobody can pronounce his name) that the great danger for the present government of Afghanistan is that the US Congress will become bored with the whole project and cancel future assistance to that distant and miserable land. McCaffery said that would result in "immediate civil war and collapse." He is absolutely right.
The US Congress cut off aid to South Vietnam in 1975 and that is what happened. We are going to see a re-run. pl
Col., as you see it, what strategic interests of the US are served by our continued presence in Afghanistan in 2015 going forward?
Posted by: ex-PFC Chuck | 26 December 2014 at 01:39 PM
ex PFC Chuck
None at all. Our continued presence is just a habit now. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 26 December 2014 at 01:48 PM
let's see, I'm lazy today so with out a search.... if memory serves I think the quote is..."the graveyard of empires".
Posted by: MEP | 26 December 2014 at 03:25 PM
I spent a large part of the last 13 years in Afghanistan. If you told me during my first vacation there that we would end up losing the war, I'd have laughed and said "How is that possible?"
We have lost the war, and we had to work very hard to lose it. It would have been so much easier to have won, and so much faster. We would not have left so much blood and treasure behind, nor would we have continued to visit horror and violence on the Afghan people.
We now are leaving because we have been defeated. I am sure some will say we won the battles. Well, if that makes them feel better, fine.
To paraphrase for our President "This is how wars are surrendered in the 21st Century."
De Oppresso Liber
JMG
Posted by: JM Gavin | 26 December 2014 at 04:11 PM
Tyler,
Off topic, but I heard on the radio news that a call (maybe a prank or maybe not) was made to a small town police station in south Texas by the border saying that a Border Patrol agent had been kidnapped by a Mexican drug trafficking organization.
Posted by: robt willmann | 26 December 2014 at 07:31 PM
"You fell victim to one of the classic blunders! The most famous of which is 'Never get involved in a land war in Asia'..."
Posted by: Imagine | 26 December 2014 at 09:25 PM
As the last decade has shown, there are things far more addictive than heroin.
Posted by: oth | 26 December 2014 at 11:06 PM
I'm curious...if you are of mind to, what would 'winning' the war have looked like?
Posted by: jonst | 27 December 2014 at 10:00 AM
I think we are 'there' now primarily because each political party is scared to 'get out', cut off 'aid', whatever, and then have another attack on the US occur which seemed to have its origins in country. I think this a ridiculous, simplistic, and unlikely prospect, don't get me wrong. But I think the Parties think if it happened on their watch....they would out of power for decades.
Posted by: jonst | 27 December 2014 at 10:04 AM
PL, I'm not a military person. But I know business. When we make investments we carefully assess risk and game outcomes, and ALWAYS have an exit strategy that is carefully and continuously maintained for the life of the investment. I'm sure this is also military doctrine (and for all I know businesses adopted this approach from the military). What happened here? And in Iraq?
Posted by: shege | 27 December 2014 at 12:29 PM
"Winning" has different dimensions, militarily, politically, socially, and more. We lost in every category.
Among other sins...
We selected and then supported a two-bit hustler and crook as he built one of the largest criminal empires in modern history, devoted to enriching himself and his cronies.
We imposed a system of government completely foreign to the Afghan people, one which the Afghan people neither wanted nor supported.
We were blind to ethnic and tribal divisions, and then allowed our military force to be applied to further partisan agendas.
We intervened and took sides in a civil war, and denied that the Taliban had a legitimate agenda supported by a large percentage of the Pashtun population.
We became an occupying army, and told ourselves that we were not, because we were somehow not like the Russians.
We kept repeating the lie that "Afghanistan" is a country, even though Afghanistan possesses none of the traits which constitute a country i.e. possess clearly defined borders, have a means to secure those borders, have a population with some sort of shared culture, language, history, or desires, or even have a national identity.
We deliberately concealed the truth, evident at every step of the way, that our actions were not working, and that we were failing.
Our military leaders consistently lied to the American people, conducting Information Operations against the US public (in violation of US law), in order to achieve political ends for elected US politicians, all to further their own careers.
Worst of all, we started a war without possessing the moral courage to fight it right, and caused misery and destruction on a massive scale. Because of this, our actions were not just wrong. Our actions were immoral.
I will bear the stain of this until the day I die, but I accept my role, because I know who I am. I am the bad guy.
Winning could have looked any number of ways. Losing looks just like it does now.
That is all.
Posted by: JM Gavin | 27 December 2014 at 01:26 PM
shege
If left to its own devices the military here always makes careful risk/benefit analyses, but in some cases the elected civilian government over-rides that calculus. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 27 December 2014 at 02:59 PM
shege
To continue the business analogy, the military in the US polity is a "cost center" like PR, quality control, pay and benefits, etc. For the political/managerial class the "profit centers" are entirely concerned with winning elections and gaining/retaining power. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 27 December 2014 at 03:25 PM
In your opinion, this failure was caused by an accumulation large numbers of mistakes - big and small - or was there a singular event/mistake from which everything else followed (follows)?
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 27 December 2014 at 03:42 PM
Robt,
Nothing concrete as of yet as far as it being valid or not.
But that's why I don't go to Mexico as well.
Posted by: Tyler | 27 December 2014 at 03:57 PM
Hubris, and human weakness on a colossal scale. Over and over again.
Posted by: JM Gavin | 27 December 2014 at 04:34 PM
JM Gavin,
Thanks! If only folks like you were the majority at flag rank.
Ishmael Zechariah
Posted by: Ishmael Zechariah | 27 December 2014 at 09:23 PM
On another topic again....
Who is harassing Malaysia?
Malaysia flight 370 "disappears" in March 2014.
Then, Malaysia flight MH17 is shot down over Ukraine, most likely by the Ukrainian government or its contractor or a proxy. Malaysia is excluded from the group "investigating" the crash.
Now, several hours ago, an AirAsia passenger jet goes missing during a flight from Indonesia to Singapore. AirAsia is based in Malaysia--
http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/27/world/asia/airasia-missing-plane/index.html
Posted by: robt willmann | 28 December 2014 at 12:19 AM
IZ
LTG James Gavin died in 1990. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 28 December 2014 at 09:40 AM
Indeed, I am just a working stiff, my only connection to LTG Gavin is our service in the US Army (and my respect for him).
DOL,
JMG
Posted by: JM Gavin | 28 December 2014 at 03:24 PM
Nevertheless, your comprehensive assessment of why the US misadventure in Afghanistan has been a total failure is spot-on.
Just as the Iraq one was.
Posted by: FB Ali | 28 December 2014 at 05:27 PM