"US attacks on the Sunni Islamic State in Iraq and its cooperation and arming of the ruling Shi’ite government there, is the latest signal that the West is moving towards an arrangement with the Shi’ite Iranian axis, which includes Hezbollah, Iraq, and Syria.
Such an alignment has been feared by the Sunni world and Israel for some time." Jpost
---------------------
The SecDef/CJCS presser yesterday was illuminating in many ways. Most obviously they were covering for the absent Golfer in Chief whose smiling and laughing person is so evident in the media, Dempsey stated forthrightly that IS is especially dangerous because its ambitions are both limitless and apocalyptic, and that eventually the movement will have to be defeated and destroyed. I agree with that assesment. The Jpost quote above is merely Israeli logrolling expressing their frustration with not being able to "move" the Golfer's foreign policy in the detail they would like. You can expect to see a maximum effort by Bibi's vendu US Congress to block a nuclear deal with Iran (or any other kind of deal). I agree with Dempsey that IS is an existential threat to all the regional governent except Israel and Iran. Having said that, I remind everyone again that it was the US invasion of Iraq and destruction of the existing Iraqi state as well as US agitation leading to the Arab Spring disasters that were the root causes for the disorder that now infests Iraq, Syria and potentially all the other Arab States. It was one of the main functions of the previous governments to suppress the Sunni extremists who have now found their voice in IS. We broke these governments and now we truly and unfortunately own the mess. We are going to war against IS. This time there should be a declaration of war by Congress. That would clean up a lot of the legal issues that plagued the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan pl
*******************
"General Lord Dannatt’s comments come almost a year since David Cameron lost a Commons vote authorising air strikes on President Assad in response to chemical weapons attacks on civilians – action that would likely have toppled him from power.
Britain and its allies have repeatedly called for Assad to step down to bring the three-year civil war that spawned Isil to an end.
Isil must be “opposed, confronted and defeated” in Iraq and Syria before it spreads through the region, Lord Dannatt told BBC Radio 4.
"The Syrian dimension has got to be addressed. You cannot deal with half a problem," he said.
"The old saying 'my enemy's enemy is my friend' has begun to have some resonance with our relationship with Iran.
"I think it's going to have to have some resonance with our relationship with Assad."
"I think whether it is above the counter or below the counter, a conversation has got to be held with him." Telegraph
---------------------------
Danatt's conclusion in this matter is so full of common sense that some of the newsies are beginning to understand it. In spite of all the Likud inspired AIPAC/neocon/R2P pressure and propaganda, it should be clear now that the cooperation of the Syran government is needed to defeat IS and the Nusra Front. Yesterday Dempsey repeated the tired, shop worn drivel of the Golfer's policy hacks with regard to Syria. I prefer to believe that he does not really believe what he said but is forced to say the words if he wishes to remain CJCS. pl
*****************
"The Palestinian Facebook page posted a photograph of a mosque in Gaza City, where a crowd stood and waited in anticipation of more executions.
Earlier Friday, Hamas security forces killed 11 suspected collaborators at a Gaza police station. Shortly afterward Hamas killed seven more Palestinians in a public execution in a central Gaza square on Friday, witnesses and a Hamaswebsite said.
The victims, their heads covered and hands tied, were shot dead by masked gunmen dressed in black in front of a crowd of worshipers outside a mosque after prayers, witnesses andal-Majd, a pro-Hamas website, said.
In a sign of Hamas's increasing tight grip in the enclave following Israel's targeting killings of three of the group's senior commanders, nearly a dozen Palestinians were reportedly killed at the Jawazat installation in the Strip."Jpost
-------------------------
It has been clear for some time that Palestinan Israeli agents are pervasively present in Gaza as they must be in the West Bank. The rapidity and pin point accuracy of Israeli air strikes on personnel targets as they present themselves can be accounted for in no other way. Expect a lot more executions. pl
*******************
"Three-quarters of Israeli Jews and nearly two-thirds of Israeli Arabs would not marry someone from a different religion, according to a poll.
Conducted by Haaretz and the Dialog company on Tuesday and Wednesday, the poll found that opposition to interfaith relationships was highest among haredi Orthodox Jews, at 95 percent. But 88 percent of traditional and religious Jews, as well as 64 percent of secular Jews, also opposed interdating.
Seventy-one percent of Muslim Israeli Arabs opposed interfaith relationships, but only half of Christian Israeli Arabs were opposed.
Across religious denominations, Israeli Jews would be much more opposed to their relatives marrying Arabs than they would be to relatives marrying non-Arab gentiles. Only a third of secular Jewish Israelis would be opposed to a relative marrying an American or European Christian, but a majority would oppose a relative marrying an Arab. Seventy-two percent of Israeli Jews overall would be opposed to a relative marrying an Arab. JTA
----------------------------
One of the key indications of progress toward the elimination of ethno-sectarian hostility in the ME (or anywhere else I suppose) has been a willingness to have consensual sex with "the other." If this is reflected in actual marriage with all its explicit cross communal responsibilities and civilities so much the better. There used to be a fair amount of sex between Israeli Jewish women and Palestinian men. I have known a number of Arab men who had Jewish mistresses. The comments of the Arabs as to why they had them were quite complimentary to the Jewish women. There were even a few marriages. Anthony Bourdain (now there is a lovely man) in his Israel sited TV show episode of "Parts Unknown" visits a mixed faith married couple who are running a restaurant out in the country. Such faith is touching to behold. In Iraq, Syria, Jordan and Lebanon such marriages were fairly common twenty years ago, but no more.
This is a really bad sign. pl
All:
UK Foreign Minister reject cooperation with the Syrian Arab Republic against ISIS:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/22/philip-hammond-assad-not-ally-fight-isis-syria
(and by implication, I imagine, with Iran).
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 22 August 2014 at 03:16 PM
Col. Lang:
To your point about inter-marriage; US could also benefit by Euro-American men marrying African-American women.
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 22 August 2014 at 03:18 PM
Cooperation with Assad: There are two remarks by credible ME journalists that recent precise Syrian air force attacks on IS targets in Raqqa were done with the help of U.S. intelligence.
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2014/08/syria-us-intelligence-for-syrian-air-force-bombing.html
This is likely an under-the-table co-operation through a third party that will hopefully become some regular theme.
Posted by: b | 22 August 2014 at 03:28 PM
Babak
I thought you lived in the US. there is now far more of such marriages than there ever were in the ME. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 22 August 2014 at 03:29 PM
Col.: Ha ha... my wife was watching one of Bourdain's shows on the internet not long ago. A show about a loud, obnoxious New Yorker's opinion on places that are not New York. While I find Bourdain mostly tolerable, I had the random thought "I bet Pat Lang loves this guy."
Posted by: Medicine Man | 22 August 2014 at 03:31 PM
In reply to rick
I stopped considering myself part of "the NPR community" when they interviewed John Yoo, of torture memo infamy, in their smooth stenographic way, without offering any challenging questions or balancing remarks from other persons with a differing perspective.
My wife and I still make a point of listening to "Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me".
Posted by: mistah charley, ph.d. | 22 August 2014 at 03:48 PM
Col. Lang -
I agree that there should be a formal Declaration of War against IS by Congress.
Posted by: mistah charley, ph.d. | 22 August 2014 at 03:58 PM
Colonel,
This is a superb description of the collapse the Middle East governing States in the 21st century and their replacement with chaos. The rise of the Islamic State is not good for any person who is not a Sunni true believer. One could describe the Global War on Terror (GWOT) as an abject failure but this is not true for war profiteers or flight capital managers.
The Western Democracies are no longer run for the benefit of their citizens but for a very select few. Europe’s recession is really a depression; worse than the 1930s:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/08/20/worse-than-the-1930s-europes-recession-is-really-a-depression/
Like the Great Depression the loss of jobs and income has given rise to ultra-nationalist governments in Hungary and Ukraine. The West is trying to destabilize Russia which could lead to ultra-nationalists seizing control there too.
Across the world the goal of the ruling 0.01% is to destroy States, end the rule of law, sell weapons and munitions, and gain control of resources. We are the collateral damage.
The only way to combat the Islamic State and stop the spread of war is to reestablish States ruled by and for their people and that work together in accordance with international law.
Posted by: VietnamVet | 22 August 2014 at 04:01 PM
I love that Anthony Bourdain deliberately made a point of picking up and holding a Palestinian child in Gaza. Him doing so was a real highlight of that episode.
Posted by: rich | 22 August 2014 at 04:26 PM
Sir
All 3 of my kids have married Americans of mixed ethnicities. Mixed marriages I believe have been growing for some decades. My kids spouses parents started the ball rolling in the 50s/60s.
I had to laugh at Tyler's suggestion on another thread that we should segregate our society. Which neighborhood would my kids families go? Despite many of our racial problems I think there is substantial assimilation to an " American culture ". Second generation Vietnamese and Laotian kids are not much different than white kids from the burbs at least in terms of accent, speaking style, food tastes, etc. The main difference that I have noticed is that their parents push on them more conservative values around education and sexuality.
Posted by: Jack | 22 August 2014 at 04:39 PM
Col. Lang,
With all due respect with regard to your suggestion: "This time there should be a declaration of war by Congress. That would clean up a lot of the legal issues that plagued the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan pl ", I believe this is a fraught issue. Like the various wars declared in my lifetime (on cancer drugs, terrorism), I believe we can only realistically declare war on some entity that can surrender. I am not competent to address the issue of whether it would clear up the legal issues, such as status of forces and legal status of combatants deployed, but it does seem to me that "unconditional surrender" can only apply to entities that can be occupied to enforce it. Such a declaration might oblige Congress and the American people mobilize behind a unified set of objectives and pursue them relentlessly with the sacrifices required. I was struck by the fact that, when we initiated the incursion into Iraq, there were only one or two or fewer than a handful of members of Congress who had children serving in the military.
Posted by: Haralambos | 22 August 2014 at 05:29 PM
Haralambos
"Like the various wars declared in my lifetime (on cancer drugs, terrorism)," No it is nothing like that. Those were mere rhetorical gestures. this would have this would have the force of law. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 22 August 2014 at 05:35 PM
VietnamVet,
"The West is trying to destabilize Russia....."
A refreshing change from the usual tone of comment (by 'pundits' no less than media hacks) on Russian-American relations is a recent piece by Thomas Graham (unsurprisingly, of Kissinger Associates). A serious and realistic view of the problem, and its solution.
http://tinyurl.com/lmqmkbg
Posted by: FB Ali | 22 August 2014 at 05:44 PM
Col. Lang.,
Again with all due respect, how would the "force of law" make a difference? I do not mean to be obtuse, but short of my sense that it would require massive agreement among the politicians and citizens and require sacrifices I think few would agree to, at the end of the day who surrenders to us unconditionally and how do we enforce it? Our Civil War ended with unconditional surrender and occupation of the defeated Confederate States and Reconstruction, the effects of which live with us today, although they seem to be diminishing. I grew up in the North with many stereotypes about the South, most mistaken. I recall reading Faulkner's _Intruder in the Dust_ as a 20-yr-old in 1969 and realized the intruder was we Northerners. I was also fortunate to meet many Southerners in graduate school whose views disabused me of many of my stereotypes. Apologies for the length.
Posted by: Haralambos | 22 August 2014 at 05:49 PM
haralambos
We are are not Greece. a declaration of war would enable many things. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 22 August 2014 at 06:19 PM
Col.,
Is it legally possible for the US to make a declaration of war on a non state entity?
Posted by: nick b | 22 August 2014 at 06:38 PM
Colonel Lang
On the subject of mixed marriages and inter-cultural sex- Hear, Hear! The sooner we get on with this project the sooner we can put this horrible business behind us.
As a very happy participant in this effort I can tell you endless and hilarious stories how this kind of thing brings people together- and not just the conjugants.
My dad for example insisted ( as a scare tactic I am sure) that my swedish bride to be and I 'write the book' with a bona fide Shia Imam who was living in a shack somewhere north of Atlanta. I have no idea where he found this guy. But she went through the whole thing with the chador and all, and my dad made sure she understood how easy it was in Muslim law to divorce someone (by declaring three times 'I divorce thee'). Needless to say she didn't take the bait . Twelve years and three grandkids later Im pretty sure he's glad she didn't.
Likewise my swedish mother in law, on the advice of her father, made sure that one of the meals for supper served on my first visit to them, would be delicious roast ham. She duly served it up and seeing that I was not in any way squeamish about tearing into some ham, she reported the results of this pork test to my wife's grandfather - who then grudgingly gave us his blessing.
Posted by: Swerv21 | 22 August 2014 at 06:41 PM
In reply to Haralambos
I agree that a declaration of war by the United States would have consequences in the U.S.
I don't agree that unconditional surrender and occupation is the only way a war can end - there are other possibilities.
Posted by: mistah charley, ph.d. | 22 August 2014 at 06:49 PM
@ b
It never made any sense--except perhaps in pursuit of a senseless foreign policy--for the US to attempt to overthrow Assad.
It wasn't too long ago, maybe 5 or 6 years, that Assad sought some normalization of relations with both the US and Israel.
Syria was spurned of course.
Posted by: steve | 22 August 2014 at 06:54 PM
Col.,
As ever, with respect, I hope you are right, and I hope this might change the situation for the better.
Posted by: Haralambos | 22 August 2014 at 06:56 PM
@ Colonel Lang
My son is 23, and I have noticed that neither he nor his friends pay any attention at all to the race of an individual. It's just a non-factor, as are interracial relationships.
Amidst all the gloom and doom in the US I think that's certainly an encouraging development.
Posted by: steve | 22 August 2014 at 06:59 PM
Colonel,
Do you think a declaration of war could get through Congress? How would we pay for such a war? Will there be an increase in taxes to pay for it along with the declaration or do we put it on the credit card like we did under Bush?
Posted by: GulfCoastPirate | 22 August 2014 at 07:14 PM
Col. Lang,
Including things like true treason charges against homegrown Jihadis?
Posted by: Origin | 22 August 2014 at 08:09 PM
Meanwhile:
1- France is sending weapons to the FSA. They claim that it's only light equipment (small arms, rocket launchers, bulletproof vests, etc.) that "cannot be used against us". Whatever.
http://www.france24.com/en/20140821-france-arms-syria-rebels-hollande/
http://www.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2014/08/21/comment-paris-a-livre-des-armes-aux-rebelles-syriens_4475027_3218.html
2- Someone called Daniel Byman suggests a strategy against ISIS. It seems... optimistic.
http://www.france24.com/en/20140821-france-arms-syria-rebels-hollande/
Posted by: toto | 22 August 2014 at 08:27 PM
I tuned NPR out when they cheered Bush to war in Iraq (2003) with no questions asked.
Greenwald recently skewered them for swallowing CIA talking points, hook, line and sinker.
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/08/12/nprs-dina-temple-raston-passed-cia-funded-nsa-contractor-independent-fear-monger-snowden-reporting/
How low they have sunk, indeed.
Posted by: JohnH | 22 August 2014 at 08:34 PM