In the past two days Kiev’s forces have launched several short-range ballistic missiles into areas in east Ukraine controlled by self-defense forces, CNN reports, citing US government sources. The move “marks a major escalation” in the Ukrainian crisis, CNN said.
“Three US officials confirmed to me a short time ago that US intelligence over the last 48 hours has monitored the firing of several short-range ballistic missiles from territory controlled by Ukraine government forces into areas controlled by the pro-Russian separatists,” Barbara Starr, CNN’s Pentagon correspondent, said in a live report. Short-range ballistic missiles can carry warheads of up to 1,000 pounds (450 kg) and are capable of killing dozens of people at a time, Starr said.
A Moscow correspondent for another American television network, ABC, tweeted Tuesday that the Kiev forces fired three ballistic missiles at self-defense forces near the town of Snezhnoe (Snizhne in Ukrainian) in the Donetsk Region. According to Kirit Radia, this is what a US official told ABC’s Pentagon digital journalist Luis Martinez. “In last 48 hours Ukraine's military fired 3 SS21 short range ballistic missiles at separatists near Snizhne, US official tells @LMartinezABC” (RT.com)
——————————————————————————
Oops! Somebody at the Pentagon didn’t get the memo. I cannot understand how advertising the Banderistas’ use of SRBMs helps sell the message that Putin is the devil. That’s not the worst part of this story. A correspondent for the Saker’s blog just put this news out this morning.
——————————————————————————
Information from very reliable sources. These sources are in Novorossiya, Russian Federation, EU and Ukraine:
29.07.2014 in afternoon Ukraine time 4 SS-21 Tochka tactical ballistic missiles were fired by Ukraine Armed Forces. At least two were clearly aimed at Saur Moglia with the idea of the Ukes trapped in The Cauldron having a sudden escape route opened for them. Moments before launch Russian Federation units surged toward the border at The Cauldron area and to the north of The Cauldron.
None of the 4 Tochka missiles reached their targets. I repeat, none of the 4 Tochka missiles reached their targets and none impacted with the ground anywhere that can be found in anything close to one piece. As you know this missile can carry a tactical nuke, chem/bio, cluster munition or HE in the weight of just under 500 kilos.
When the 4 missiles failed to reach their targets the Armed Forces of RF immediately halted their surge and held position. They are in the same positions 30.07.2014.
There has been a noticeable slow down of fighting activity since the launches and Strelkov has pointedly said again that Novorossiya is open to negotiations.
The 4 Tochka missiles were shot down over Novorossiya territory occupied by Ukraine Armed Forces before the missiles reached their programmed height. They were shot down from inside RF according to normally reliable sources. No visual evidence has been provided of RF shooting down the Tochka systems nor of the system used to shoot down the Tochka missiles. (Vineyard of the Saker)
——————————————————————————
Holy Moly! If this info is correct, it seems that Kiev came dangerously close to crossing an unadvertised red line. Notice there is no mention in the Western MSM about shooting down these SS-21s from Russian territory. There’s also no mention in the Russian press. It appears Putin believes in speaking softly and carrying a big “mazafaka” stick. And he will use that big mazafaka if and when he feels it is absolutely necessary to do so. This was just a love tap. All those Western boneheads (and I'm being quite polite here) hell bent on poking the Russian bear with a stick ought to take heed.
Kiev reportedly lost 125 armored vehicles in their latest attempt to encircle Donetsk and take control of the MH17 crash site. Ukrainian Defense Minister Valeriy Geletey reported to Poroshenko that the possibility of the Ukrainian army to conduct offensive operations in the Donbass is exhausted. Between the SS-21s and this latest failed offensive, the Ukies are doing everything in their power to prevent experts from reaching the crash site. I’m pretty sure they are scared witless by what the experts will find out by examining the wreckage… but more on that later.
TTG
Thank God cooler heads negotiated removing the nuclear weapons from Ukraine in the'90s. If the "West" really wants to inspect the crash site why don't they go via the Russian federation?
Posted by: Fred | 30 July 2014 at 01:37 PM
Fred,
It wasn't cooler heads. It was Russian mathematicians and engineers that prevailed. The Ukrainians tried their damnedest to bust the codes on the nukes in their possession. Luckily, they couldn't do it.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 30 July 2014 at 02:03 PM
TTG,
On MH17, my strong suspicion is that everyone has a great deal to hide.
Without wanting to accept Russian claims, however, the suggestion made by Ray McGovern and his VIPS colleagues in the memorandum for Obama which was published yesterday does seem to have some cogency:
‘If the intelligence on the shoot-down is as weak as it appears judging from the fuzzy scraps that have been released, we strongly suggest you call off the propaganda war and await the findings of those charged with investigating the shoot-down. If, on the other hand, your administration has more concrete, probative intelligence, we strongly suggest that you consider approving it for release, even if there may be some risk of damage to “sources and methods.” Too often this consideration is used to prevent information from entering the public domain where, as in this case, it belongs.’
(See http://consortiumnews.com/2014/07/29/obama-should-release-ukraine-evidence/ .)
You are in a much better position than I am to assess whether risks of damage to 'sources and methods' provide good grounds for not making evidence public. I would be interested to know what you, and other members of this 'committee of correspondence' think.
Posted by: David Habakkuk | 30 July 2014 at 02:28 PM
This is wearyingly familiar. I know that I'm not the only one thinking this but what is the over-under on it being revealed that the Ukrainian fascists were the ones who shot down that airliner? I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if this turned out to be a blatant false flag operation intended to sucker the West -- always eager to be fooled into this kind of intervention -- into doing their dirty work for them. All in exchange for the low, low risk of nuclear annihilation. Joy.
Posted by: Medicine Man | 30 July 2014 at 02:29 PM
Fred: Let me guess the sequence: In the next few weeks we will move from "The Separatists did it" to "It's really old news anyway."
Posted by: Matthew | 30 July 2014 at 02:33 PM
TTG
Ukraine’s firing of the ballistic missiles at the rebels prompted me to write letters to my Congress people saying that the Ukraine civil war is escalating and could become a shooting war between NATO and Russia which would inevitably escalate to a nuclear exchange. To prevent the total destruction of Maryland, they must demand that the White House force a settlement of the war on Ukraine; otherwise, stop all US military funding to this civil war, now.
When I wrote them last July protesting the rush to bomb Syria, for the first time I never got a letter in reply. But, the USA did not become the Jihadists’ Air Force. I would be very happy to get no reply these letters if we are still corresponding on SST next year in July and the Ukraine civil war has ended.
Posted by: VietnamVet | 30 July 2014 at 02:43 PM
Medicine Man,
What if the Ukrainians did it at the behest of their Foreign Handler?
Posted by: Thomas | 30 July 2014 at 02:54 PM
What I question is the portrayal of a false flag from Ukraine as not designed and "signed off" by the CIA agents running the Ukrainian show...
http://www.vineyardsaker.blogspot.ca/2014/07/the-not-so-subtle-art-of-russophobic.html
The visuals are worth considering.
Posted by: Castellio | 30 July 2014 at 03:02 PM
TTG,
Very good points. I can only imagine how many 'mushroom clouds' Condolezza Rice was worried about seeing from Saddaam that we would be seeing in reality courtesy of President Poroshenko's military.
Posted by: Fred | 30 July 2014 at 03:31 PM
If the US is willing to release a report claiming that our satellite surveillance spotted the launching of those three SS-21s why can't they tell us what was seen when KM17 was downed. Surely our radar surveillance by US the US destroyer in the Black Sea and the AWACs over the Baltic must have seen something as well. There seems to be tight lid on this information.
What I found puzzling is why would this SS-21 launch information be leaked in the first place. It reflects badly on the Ukrainian regime. Maybe the decision to do so was made by someone lower in command who is getting a little concerned that our top leadership is moving dangerously in Ukraine. This leak is telling the world that we have have the means to monitor Ukrainian air space and that it is probable that US intelligence already knows what happened with KM17.
Posted by: ToivoS | 30 July 2014 at 03:33 PM
Mr Habakuk, you are right, there is a strange silence about the shoot down of MH17; the 'black boxes' have been examined many days ago, but nobody knows what was found on those recodings. Were the Russians at the 'opening of the 'Pandora's boxes'?
Posted by: fanto | 30 July 2014 at 04:09 PM
fred
"If the "West" really wants to inspect the crash site why don't they go via the Russian federation?" For sure, but that would destroy the "Bad Russia! Bad Dog!" meme. The utube of Mika's Freudian slip, "Morning Jew, uh, Morning Joe" is funny. I guess Polish Catholics with aristocratic pretension disdain more than just Russians. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 30 July 2014 at 04:55 PM
All,
The only attempt by the US to give a somewhat evidence-based account of the MH17 downing was the interview given to the media by "senior US intelligence officials" on July 22, and reported by the AP at:
http://tinyurl.com/mvmj3y8
In it they said: "The plane was likely shot down by an SA-11 surface-to-air missile fired by Russian-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine...... The intelligence officials said the most likely explanation for the downing was that the rebels made a mistake".
This "accidental downing" explanation has completely disappeared from the US propaganda barrage unleashed soon after. In fact, the whole interview has disappeared, so much so that it finds no mention in the VIPS memo that David Habakkuk referred to above.
It is also interesting that the preliminary report on the black box readout says that the plane suffered explosive decompression due to the puncturing of the fuselage by missile fragments. That does not seem to rule out an air-to-air missile as the cause.
Posted by: FB Ali | 30 July 2014 at 05:36 PM
Thomas and Castellio,
I would want to see some credible indications before buying in to that specific conspiracy theory. It is easy to imagine all kinds of chicanery, including speculation about who would profit, etc. I would rather not chase too many "mental rabbits" of this sort without something more to go on.
I agree that it is not impossible. Just seems more likely to me that the locals are trying to wag the dog. They seem more likely to be willing to shoulder the risks of such an action and after what Ghouta revealed about Western leadership it is not hard to imagine another tail trying to wag the dog.
Posted by: Medicine Man | 30 July 2014 at 05:39 PM
Thomas/Castellio,
Also, I should add that I am not entirely convinced that Washington and London have that fine a control over their foreign proxy. I am sure the Ukrainians understand that they are being used as a tool to wound Russia. A transactional relationship that I'm sure the locals want to cash in on before the West decides to pretend this never happened.
Posted by: Medicine Man | 30 July 2014 at 05:49 PM
Col: She must also resent the many attacks on her father. I can't see ol' Zbig waxing eloquent about how he feels like he's "coming home" when he goes to Israel.
Posted by: Matthew | 30 July 2014 at 05:53 PM
To all here who have relevant experience, reliable contacts or considerable research skills, does this look like intelligence analysts whistleblowing this info (3 of them to Starr???) or is it a deliberate leak by the US government? And if so, to what end? I can't figure this out.
Posted by: Alan | 30 July 2014 at 05:58 PM
Attican Alan
This looks to me like the US armed forces pushing back. I used to "leak" things to the press on order from CJCS just to "even up the score." This is an old game. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 30 July 2014 at 06:13 PM
fanto commented :
nobody knows what was found on those recodings
"...On Jul 28th 2014 the Ukrainian Government reported that the flight data and cockpit voice recorders' first analysis results suggest the aircraft came down as result of an explosive decompression after the aircraft had been punctured by shrapnell from an explosion outside the aircraft. There is no such statement from the DSB leading the investigation or the AAIB conducting the read out and analysis of the black boxes.
On Jul 28th 2014 the DSB stated: "Flight recorders MH17 can be used for investigation, content will only be published in coherence with other investigation information."..."
Those interested in following the investigation should monitor http://www.avherald.com/ for updates as information is released in the normal course of the investigation. Normally aircraft accident investigations take several months if not longer.
The current URL for the MH17 investigation is http://www.avherald.com/h?article=47770f9d&opt=0
Posted by: Curtis | 30 July 2014 at 06:32 PM
Thank you Sir.
Posted by: Alan | 30 July 2014 at 06:33 PM
I don't imagine a 1000 lb. payload would have been game changing, but the rebels have been talking about a false flag chemical attack. One wonders what sort of payload the Ukrainians had mounted, or whether they we sending a warning and received a warning back from Russia.
Posted by: dsrcwt | 30 July 2014 at 06:57 PM
Yeah, I think that people tend to overestimate the level (and precision) of control that the West has on the Ukrainian forces, and that Russia has over the rebels. It reminds me of a Simpsons episode from way back when, when Homer was inciting a mob, and Lisa or Marge asked him why, and he said something like "don't worry, I intend to shape and lead them so things won't get out of control" or something very ironic like that.
~Jon
Posted by: Rocketrepreneur | 30 July 2014 at 07:41 PM
dsrcwt,
A couple of SS-21 hits on the rebel strongpoint at Saur Mogila could have been a game changer. That strongpoint is occupied by maybe a company sized unit with up to a battery of artillery at most. They have a commanding view of a lot of critical terrain. They are also well dug in, but a couple of SS-21 HE hits could very well knock it out of action. That position is key to keeping the cauldron closed around what's left of five Ukrainian brigades. It also protects a major approach to the MH17 crash site. Capturing Saur Mogila would be a major victory for the Ukies. It would also be a huge symbolic victory for them. The Soviet seizure of that hill was key to a major victory over the Germans in WWII. That's why there's a large obelisk and heroic statue on that hill.
The importance of that hill is not lost on the Russians. I imagine that is why they took action against the SS-21s and were moving their troops towards the border.
IMO the launch of the SS-21s was an act of desperation on the Banderistas' part, just as the announcement of new sanctions is an act of desperation on our part.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 30 July 2014 at 07:59 PM
TTG,
"what's left of five Ukrainian brigades." Any idea if these are "old" army or the newly incorporated savboda/privat sektor militias?
Posted by: Fred | 30 July 2014 at 08:10 PM
Col.
What's that old saying? The dogs bark but the caravan moves on? I'd like to side-track the caravan of fools who are trying to get us into the wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time - again.
Posted by: Fred | 30 July 2014 at 08:12 PM