- It is now clear that Iran does not want the US back in Iraq. this raises the odds for a direct Iranian intervention against the Sunni rebels. It also increases the chance of Iraqi Shia direct action against US personnel in Iraq.
- An Iraqi Army brigade (several thousand men) evidently completely disintegrated under rebel attack yesterday in western Anbar Province. This raises the level of my concern that something similar may occur with regard to Iraqi Army forces in general. Many armies are brittle instruments in which fear spreads from man to man untill all are running away, abandoning their equipment to the enemy.
- Haditha is now in rebel hands whether there are still Iraqi Army units in the area or not. The direct road to Baiji is open.
- The ISIS produced long tape on their occupation of Ramadi and Fallujah earlier this year reveals the hopelss incompetence of the Maliki government's forces. In one scene a small group of ISIS fighters armed with small arms, RPG-7s and satchel charges attack and overrun what looks like a police station. The facility is situated on the immediate side of the road. There are no fields of fire open to defenders. There are no fighting positions from which defenders can fire. There is no barbed wire or other obstacles outside the fortlet. The attackers simply walk up to the wall, throw a satchel charge into the courtyard and then crawl through a hole in the wall to massacre the inhabitants. Incredible! This incompetence rivals that of the US Army in the construction and siting of outposts in eastern Afghanistan during the period of the greatest infatuation with the COIN nonsense. pl
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/06/22/iraq-qaeda-sunni-syria/11232403/
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/22/us-iraq-security-idUSKBN0EX0BJ20140622
http://www.iol.co.za/news/world/iran-rejects-us-action-in-iraq-1.1707221#.U6bqc_ldVQQ
Colonel,
I do not know what to say. I am waiting with disquiet for the next shoe to fall. It probably has fallen but is not being reported by the Western Press.
I would not be surprised if Iran and the House of Saud say the hell to USA, Israel and ISIS and join Russia and China and price oil and gas in Renminbi.
If the collapse of the Soviet Union is a guide, the first thing to be the eliminated after the collapse of the American hegemony will be government pensions; that is if we avoid WWIII.
Posted by: VietnamVet | 22 June 2014 at 03:42 PM
All: Meanwhile back in Ukraine. This curious story from Lviv about the schism in the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church. A stalwart of Ukrainian nationalism, the Church has seen a faction move to support Putin and pro-Russian sentiments. The mastermind is said to be a Czech formerly of the Soviet intelligences services. Somehow The Saker came to mind.
"Even before mysterious pro-Russian gunmen began hacking away at Ukraine’s sovereignty in the Crimea and now in eastern Ukraine, a well-planned and curiously well-funded assault was already underway in the west of the country on the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, an institution that has sustained Ukraine spiritually for generations and helped keep alive belief in the possibility of a separate, independent Ukrainian state.
"[It] was allowed to resurface by Mikhail Gorbachev in the late 1980s and, continuing its traditional role as a bastion of resistance to domination by Russia, helped rally support for the establishment of an independent Ukrainian state in 1991.
"In recent years, however, it has confronted an obscure pro-Moscow revolt from within its own ranks. Claiming to represent the church’s true spiritual purpose, a clutch of fundamentalist priests with political views closely aligned to those of Russia formed its own rival hierarchy and recruited people like Father Andriy, a former factory worker, to spread their message about Europe’s satanic ills."
More details: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/22/world/europe/ukrainian-church-faces-obscure-pro-russia-revolt-in-its-own-ranks.html?ref=world
Posted by: Margaret Steinfels | 22 June 2014 at 05:47 PM
Ms. Steinfels,
What is "curious" about it?
The Russian government is promoting Christian social values & norms to its population. They are dismissing & mocking their rich, perverted, & Godless foreign critics.
It is no surprise that any number of Christians would admire (even envy) such courage & action. As a result, they would naturally view Russia's opponents in the EU with great suspicion.
There is certainly nothing "curious" about the regions political actors decrying "Europe's satanic ills".
Just look at Poland, where the anti-Russian & nationalist opposition (who recently-governed & polls indicate may govern again) say the same about the EU...and worse!
IMO - your curiosity is mis-focused,
Paul Escobar
Posted by: Paul Escobar | 22 June 2014 at 06:44 PM
M Steinfels-- From what I understand, there are some conservative Roman Catholics in the US who are also quite supportive of Putin's views about the current state of Western culture. It isn't surprising to me at all that Putin's message would also appeal to some Ukrainians.
Posted by: cville reader | 22 June 2014 at 07:48 PM
Iranian Intervention..Finally...Now Chalibi Can Drink His Own Koolaid...with His Iranian Handlers..All He had to do to suck the Neo Cons In was send the younger brother of One of His top Aids...Rafid Alwan al-Janabi (CURVEBALL) to German with a frabricated story of Iraqs WMDS and Suck those NeoCon suckers In..Get the Americans to do the Dirty Work..Get Rid of Saddam..and the Sunni Military ..Set up Maliki and the Shias..and suck everything they could out of The Suckers doing it.. Amazing what those LIARS CLUBS can accomplish while BSing the Naïve and Gullible People in the World...The American VOTER..
Posted by: Jim Ticehurst | 23 June 2014 at 12:53 AM
In regards to my earlier question, about the support for the ISIL by decision makers in DC, having been called moronic ME conspiratorial chatter:
Denying key information or providing wrong assessment to one's "ally" in Iraq ( http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/06/22/368171/us-denied-iraq-with-key-info-on-isil/ ), while supporting one's enemy in Syria with "non-lethal" aid (including non-lethal AT-rockets, ammunition, intelligence, communications gear…) would certainly help in them overrunning garrisons, ammunition depots, cities and maybe even the country. It sounds like those supporting the ISIL in Syria and Iraq are fed from the same nipple or to put it differently, "breath together" or Con Spirare. As I had said before, it is better to be the "enemy" of the States than it's "friend".
It also sound like Chalabi and the Washington Neo-Con/Lib are Con Spirare.
http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/ahmed_chalabi_chief_peddler_of_false_wmds_meets_us_officials_20140621
Or to translate a Flemish proverb "when there is smoke, there must be fire close by".
Posted by: Amir | 23 June 2014 at 01:35 AM
All
Can this be true? Quote:
"... the CIA had lost many of its sources inside the government in Baghdad, which is now firmly in Shiite hands. Since assuming power in 2006, Iraq’s Shiite Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki, gradually purged most Sunnis from senior government positions, thus shutting down the CIA’s eyes and ears in Baghdad. ..."
Source:
http://intelnews.org/2014/06/23/01-1501/
That would explain to me why the US wants Maliki out of power in Iraq.
Posted by: Bandolero | 23 June 2014 at 02:08 AM
TThe Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church is actually a minority faith of the religious population, being a distant second to the majority Eastern Orthodox faith in Ukraine. But there had long been a schism in the majority Orthodox faith. There is the Ukrainian Orthodox Church – Kyiv Patriarchate, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church – Moscow Patriarchate and then the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church. Currently, the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church predominates in three western oblasts of Ukraine, including about half the population of Lviv, but constitutes a small minority elsewhere in the country. The Russians may try to exploit differences there, but the western part of Ukriane is already more inclined to be anti-Russian. It is the schisms in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church that Moscow would try to exploit.
Posted by: oofda | 23 June 2014 at 08:06 AM
I found this information on the Iraqi Army OOB. It is quite detailed, showing force locations and in some cases, how they are equipped.
http://home.comcast.net/~djyae/site/?/page/Iraq_Order_of_Battle/
Posted by: Ryan | 23 June 2014 at 08:09 AM
The referenced article's last sentence is a laugh, "But a current US intelligence official told Stein that, although the Sunni insurgency took the CIA by surprise, “Washington had a clear picture” of the situation in the country and that its intelligence “capabilities are intact”." .... I'm pretty sure better intel is available on web searchable local newspapers and Google. Locals have been saying the place will blow for months.
Posted by: bth | 23 June 2014 at 10:29 AM
Mr. Escobar: Curious because it is the first mention I've seen from NYTimes reporters on the role of religious groups in Ukraine. In fairly stereotypical Times style the story begins with parishioners disagreeing with their priest and then moves on to the larger point. But also curious because the reporter identifies the man said to be behind the schism (a Czech) as Mr. (i.e., no ecclesiastical title). What exactly is his function in the splintered church. The Eastern orthodox tend to give lay people roles in church governance, is that the case with Mr. Dohnal? Probably there are more curiosities that I've missed.
Posted by: Margaret Steinfels | 23 June 2014 at 10:51 AM
CR: Perhaps. But such conservatives are hardly taking their cues from Mr. Putin. Some of them were certainly part of the anti-communist crusades of the Cold War years. I doubt they've changed their mind about Russian leaders.
Posted by: Margaret Steinfels | 23 June 2014 at 10:54 AM
Posted by: Bandolero | 23 June 2014 at 04:39 PM
Maybe you should explain what you have against Russian leaders...
They have managed to move away from a one-party totalitarian structure to a functioning democracy and a mixed economy. They have also managed to dismantle the oligarchic state imposed under Yeltsin by western financial organizations.
I am unclear how much you understand about contemporary Russia, or if your point is to simply echo the talking points of the NYT – hardly a reliable source of information.
Posted by: Castellio | 23 June 2014 at 05:19 PM
My office cleaning lady's son was in one of those Afghani outposts three months ago. He walked out of the hut one night, leaving five of his buddies inside. He heard a rustling behind him and saw someone throw a bag through the window. Everyone inside died. He was thrown. but the debris fell on him. He waited hours for the trauma helicopter, and only lapsed into unconsciousness when they got him on the chopper. He lost his right leg and left arm. No one will tell her where her son is, and her English is poor. She works three jobs. She is desperate to talk to him. Her other son found out they were airlifting him from San Diego to Walter Reed. Then she was let go because the building was cutting back on daily janitorial services.
Posted by: MRW | 24 June 2014 at 12:08 AM
You jest! functioning democracy? mixed economy? No democracy is perfect. No economy is perfect. Not ours. Not theirs, but just more imperfect than many.
Posted by: Margaret Steinfels | 24 June 2014 at 09:08 PM
Not jesting at all, and I am, frankly, surprised by your insistence. Does your position reflect personal experience and concerted questioning, or simply English mass media?
Anyhow, if you want to see Putin's answers to (perhaps) your own questions: start at 24.30 in the following interviews, and do watch it to the end: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gvbS09gN80
I appreciate your acknowledgement that no government is the ideal.
Posted by: Castellio | 25 June 2014 at 11:40 AM