"Spec. Ivan Lopez, 34, was a military truck driver who served four months in Iraq in 2011. He had arrived at the post in February from another military base in Texas. He was married and had family living in the Fort Hood area, Milley said. The man was living in a rundown apartment complex in northwest Killeen where neighbors said he and his wife kept to themselves. “He was the kind of person that even if you tried to talk to him wouldn’t open up,” Jessie Brown, a neighbor who often passed him on morning walks, told the Post. About 4 p.m. Wednesday, the soldier assigned to the 13th Sustainment Command fired shots inside a building housing the 1st Medical Brigade and in a facility belonging to the 49th Transportation Battalion. He was soon confronted by a female military police officer who has not yet been identified, Milley said. Milley said the man put his hands up but then pulled out a gun from under his jacket. He shot himself in the head with a .45-caliber semi-automatic pistol that was purchased recently but not authorized on base." Washpost
----------------------------------
Soldiers are grouped by Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) into three broad categories:
- Combat Arms (Infantry, Armor, Artillery, Aviation, Special Forces and Combat Engineers (these people are the fighters)
- Combat Support Arms (Other Engineers, MI, Military Police Corps, Signal Corps, non combat aviation)(These people are those who directly support the fighting and in many instances are involved in some fighting themselves)
- Combat Service Support (Acquisition Corps, Chaplains Corps, Finance Corps, Judge Advocate Generals Corps, Medical Corps, Ordnance Corps, Quartermaster Corps and Transportation Corps) (These people may be involved in fighting but in the normal course of events are not)
Former major Nidal Hassan and Specialist Ivan Lopez both were in the Combat Service Support category. All soldiers are inherently fighters with the exception of medical personnel and chaplains, but most do not have the direct function of fighting. If they fight, this usually occurs as self defense.
This man was 34 years old. His rank was Specialist (E-4). This is a low rank in the enlisted force of the US Army. How long had he served? Nine years in the Puerto Rico National Guard and then in recent years in the Regular Army. He certainly was not prospering in the Army. His MOS made him not a non-combatant but certainly not someone whose basic business was fighting.
He served in Iraq for four months as a truck driver in a Transportation Corps unit. This was in 2011. The withdrawal was in full progress and there was then something approaching a cease fire observed by various enemies of the US. It was clear that their intention was to allow US forces to withdraw. There is no indication that he ever heard "a shot fired in anger." He drove trucks, big trucks hauling equipment to Kuwait. The degree of stress involved in this has been much exagerated in the present atmosphere. There is little in such duty that would drive a man mad. There is no indication that he was wounded or seriously injured in Iraq.
Lopez had a wife and a child. His pay and allowances would not have been enough for them to live comfortably. They were probably eligible for food stamps and are reported to have lived in a shabby apartment complex off post in Killeen, Texas just outside the post gate. IMO it is a fair question whether or not a soldier of so low a grade should be allowed to be married with family. The money is just not there. It used to be the rule that soldiers of that rank were required to have the permission of their commanding officer to marry. Perhaps that was a good idea. The stresses set up by poverty are great.
Lopez bought his weapon in a civilian gun store in Killeen. He had not yet been officially diagnosed as mentally ill although the process was underway and he was medicated for depression and anxiety. A conclusion had not been reached with regard to PTSD and presumably for that reason no input had been made into the national firearms background check system that presumably would have kept Lopez from buying his pistol.
It should be remembered that the US Army cannot be in the business of generating veterans' disability benefits for anyone who wants them unless it is established objectively that these benefits are deserved. The troops have learned that a diagnosis of PTSD or TBI brings with it a substantial benefit from the VA in the form of lifetime: treatment at no expense, tax benefits and disability payments. These are particularly helpful for people who separate from the military before serving long enough to achieve retired status.
There will, of course be, an outcry from the anti-gun people. pl
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/04/03/fort-hood-shooting-live-updates/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ft_Hood
I wish the Army of today, in some respects, was more like the Army of yesterday. I'm not saying we need to go back to four enlisted in a room with everything dress right dress in every closet, but permission to marry is near and dear. I recommended on several occasions to my commander that young E2s should not be given command sponsorship due to shenanigans of the fiance.
An example of the weakness of today's mentality can be seen in how a black female specialist can post a petition to the white house to change AR 670-1 because the new grooming standards are racist, I shit you not. I guess it will take another serious land war toknock the Army out of this self esteem at all costs mode of thinking tthat's been in play for far too long. Witness GEN Allen shamefully going on about "diversity is our strength" after the Hassan attack. That overgilted idiot refused to recognize how the Army's idiotic focus on diversity precipitated the killings!
As an aside, I wonder if the military climate of Hood is conductive to this sort of thing. I've heard some stories about things happening on Bragg, but what I've heard about how fast and loose Hood is sounds unbelievable.
Posted by: Tyler | 03 April 2014 at 11:32 AM
Well its hard to outcry when its military on military and an officer who drew her weapon seems to have precipitated the suicidal ending of the assault.
Ergo, condolences and kudos.
Perhaps an outcry from the veterans services people notwithstanding your observation on the need for claims documentation.
Posted by: Charles 1 | 03 April 2014 at 11:38 AM
Charles !
It will be interesting to learn;
- Was this person a soldier of the Military Police?
- Was this person enlisted or an officer?
- was this person a civilian civil service post police person and not in the military at all? pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 03 April 2014 at 11:42 AM
Tyler: From the Colonel's summary, this appears to be a crime of frustration, i.e., a crime. How can the Army prevent the impossible?
I suspect we will be bombarded by lots of sloppy reporting and shallow commentary over this.
Posted by: Matthew | 03 April 2014 at 11:54 AM
Because many of us who participate on this blog have served in the military, we approach this incident as an Army problem. The problem needs to be looked at from a mental health view. How do we keep weapons away from people who exhibit the first sign of mental problems. Mass killings all have one common denominator: a mentally impaired shooter.
Posted by: r whitman | 03 April 2014 at 12:54 PM
Tyler,
" I guess it will take another serious land war ...."
Yes, but it is the politicians who need to have sense knocked into them. For them the most important war is the "war on women". As you know it wasn't a lesbian doing the shooting, so obviously we need more gay women in the combat arms. Problem solved!
Posted by: Fred | 03 April 2014 at 01:52 PM
Tyler
He was in a Service Support branch, Transportation. There are a lot of women there, a good many probably prefer other women. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 03 April 2014 at 02:37 PM
concur.
Posted by: Bryan | 03 April 2014 at 02:46 PM
That's a hell of a stereotype, COL Lang!
Of course, stereotypes generally exist because they are true. You apparently have the same experience and impressions of the Motor T world as I do...
Posted by: John Gavin | 03 April 2014 at 02:51 PM
R Whitman is right. This is not an Army problem. It's a problem of mental health. Although Lopez was not yet diagnosed with PTSD, he was being treated with Ambien for sleep disorders and some kind of medication for depression. That shit is dangerously unpredictable. The danger to one's mind from these drug combinations is probably worse than surviving a roadside bomb on a road in Iraq, which Lopez did not experience.
IMO, treatment of mental illness is far less developed than treatment of physical illness. Diagnosis is still a matter of guesswork and treatment, especially medicinal treatment, is a matter of trying stuff and seeing if it works... or makes matters worse. It's closer to the level of medicine in the early 1800s.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 03 April 2014 at 02:55 PM
I fail to understand why the wages for a full time job, particularly in the military, might not enough to support a wife and child without financial stress in the worlds most advanced economy - whether this is relevant to this discussion is a moot point.
Posted by: walrus | 03 April 2014 at 03:01 PM
There's always inane stuff that happens on Army posts, that's just the nature of the beast.
The point has been made before that the public makes up for its lack of involvement with the military by unilateral hero worship. Already the PTSD troupes are being trotted out, when as the good Colonel pointed out, its very likely he never heard a shot fired in anger.
So as you say: sloppy reporting and shallow commentary. Perhaps a call for more money to fix the perpetually wrecked VA that will vanish down a hole to never be seen again.
Posted by: Tyler | 03 April 2014 at 03:04 PM
A 34 year old married spec4 with children cannot be a happy soldier.....
Posted by: georgeg | 03 April 2014 at 03:05 PM
Its going to be a damned mess and people will die in the name of their secular religious insanity called diversity. The same people so smug about science can't get it through their heads that there are fundamental biological differences between men and women.
It got memory holed recently that Obama called the service chiefs into his office, told them gays in the military was a done deal and that if they had a problem with it they could resign their commissions. The days of GEN Marshall are long gone.
Posted by: Tyler | 03 April 2014 at 03:06 PM
Likely. That was my experience as well. That or women who were, to put it politely, "infantry mattresses".
I wonder how he kept his job as an E4 for so long when the Army is looking to chapter out infantrymen who were honorably injured as fast as possible. Got to have room for those new Diverse Soldiers or whatever the new progressive flavor of the month is.
Posted by: Tyler | 03 April 2014 at 03:08 PM
Walrus
Old thing. Soldiers do not have the opportunity to compete and participate in "the world's greatest economy." They take what the Congress gives them. Would an Australian corporal have the means from pay and allowances to live as well as you say Lopez should have lived? pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 03 April 2014 at 03:09 PM
John Gavin
You mean the part about lots of women in the CS and SS branches? Stereotype? That's very funny! Lesbians? Hey that's traditional stuff. It has been that way so long as I can remember and that is a ways back. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 03 April 2014 at 03:14 PM
Mainly because so many of the benefits of the military aren't listed explicitly as pay benefits. You've got the commissary, PX, medical, and housing allowances that add up to a shiny penny.
BUT, according to the latest military pay tables, an E4 with 9 years makes about 2490 a month. I'm not sure how the reserve to active conversion works, but I'll be generous here. As a single E4 getting jump pay with two years of tax free paychecks and pulling combat pay, Alaskan COLA, and the Oil Diff Fund, I was comfortable enough to be able to fly home (or wherever else) on leave, make payments on a car, keep a fridge stocked with beer, take a lady out on the town, and generally live it up a little.
If you're a married E4 living off post with multiple children, I imagine that pay check does not ever stretch far enough. I guess what I'm getting at is that the Army will help you, to a point, but you've got to take some responsibility for your own actions, and part of that is making sure you can take care of your kids.
Posted by: Tyler | 03 April 2014 at 03:17 PM
Sir,
You should make a thread where us soldiers sit around and tell stories that go "Well there was this one female who..." and see where it goes.
Posted by: Tyler | 03 April 2014 at 03:21 PM
Tyler
It is a long, long time since I commanded a bunch of E-4s, but I would say that even though they made much less money than you did the single men lived well, the married ones not well at all. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 03 April 2014 at 03:22 PM
"The problem needs to be looked at from a mental health view."
If you can’t be trusted with a weapon what else can you not be trusted with – like your own children, the children at the school you teach at, the car you drive to work? What professions shall you be restricted from? Is this a permanent label or temporary? Who gets to do the diagnosis 'proving' you have a condition that requires such restrictions? How do you prove you are no longer have that condition?
When will we start evaluating the impact of all the drugs issued for stress/depression etc and how they are contributing to suicide and in this case possibly contributing to mass-murder suicide?
Posted by: Fred | 03 April 2014 at 03:23 PM
Tyler
ok. will we survive the experience? pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 03 April 2014 at 03:25 PM
An E-4 over 6 years grosses $2427.30 monthly and $1157 BAH with dependents. There's a clothing allowance also. Hardly a princely sum but at $44,000+ annually, not too awful bad. About what an experienced OTR truck driver makes. Far too many of the troops have no financial savvy (stereotype alert), fall prey to payday loans, and never heard of a budget, and there are predators lurking aside every gate.
Posted by: Hdl | 03 April 2014 at 03:28 PM
2490/month is $14.65 hr in the civilian world. That is about $1.14 less than the latest UAW contract starting wage in the automotive industry, and they don't get free medical. Don't forget that the cost of living in Texas is allot lower than elsewhere.
Posted by: Fred | 03 April 2014 at 03:33 PM
Walrus,
In 1976 I lived with my new bride in a shabby apartment complex just outside the gate of Fort Benning in Columbus, Georgia. I taught my wife to shoot my 30-30 lever action when the local sheriff advised us of shootings in the apartment complex. My full monthly take home pay was $666. I remember that figure for obvious reasons. We couldn't afford air conditioning during the Georgia Summer. Military compensation has come a long way since then, but it's still not a path to riches. It should never be.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 03 April 2014 at 03:34 PM