"As for armed drones or AC-130 Spectre gunships, officials say that they were too far away to help. Unclassified data put the range of Predator and Reaper armed drones at 770 miles and 1,150 miles, respectively. The nearest known base for armed drones, in Djibouti, is about 1,700 miles from Benghazi. Regarding the Spectre gunships, Little said: “No AC-130 was within a continent’s range of Benghazi.”" David Ignatius
-----------------------------------------
Yes, nasty embarassments result from; distances and times and numbers of thingies. That's what adequate risk assesments, measuring distances on maps, figuring out tonnages and throughputs of supplies are all about. I spent months at the Armed forces Staff College in 1974 beginning to learn how to plan expeditions large and small. How to "get there with the most men," supplies and sustainable fire power was always the "name of the game." This will always be the name of the game.
It may well have been impossible to make that "consulate" hard enough to make it capable of holding out until help came. Does that mean that the place should have been abandoned? This is not necessarily the case. Sometimes the national interest requires the acceptance of a lot of risk. Ask soldiers about that. Ask them that rather than chanting the meaningless mantra of your thanks at them.
Should scarce national level assets like Hercules gunships (AC-130) be dedicated to stake-outs for the purpose of protecting little posts like this one at Benghazi? There are 25 such gunships in the whole USAF.
If such aerial firepower had been available should it have been used against unknown enemies on the ground without regard to the effect on the inhabitants of Benghazi?
These are real questions. These are questions that should be answered We should be talking about these factors not some Baron Munchausen nonsense about magic carpets that span the globe in an instant. pl
"Sometimes the national interest requires the acceptance of a lot of risk. Ask soldiers about that. Ask them that rather than chanting the meaningless mantra of your thanks at them."
This really strikes home. I volunteer at the USO at Dulles. We handle problems large and small for servicemen and their families.
Some volunteers insist on saying "think you for your service" to every single person—wounded warrior, rear echelon clerk, wife and child. I believe we do owe thanks, but somehow saying that over and over like a parrot kind of creeps me out. I have never been able to say it. I think actually being there for those who need help is the right kind of payback. If you can't do something in person to help then cash is always accepted at the USO website
I try to say something personal to those I assist, but not that mantra. I thought all along I was being weird. I am glad to see this expressed in print.
Posted by: Basilisk | 01 November 2012 at 10:15 AM
Far too many use the courage God gave them to complain about their tax burden as an American and assuage their guilty feelings with a trite 'thank you for your service'. I’ve asked half a dozen people her to stop saying that to me.
"If such aerial firepower had been available should it have been used against unknown enemies on the ground without regard to the effect on the inhabitants of Benghazi?" Those same courageous taxpayers I mentioned aren't considering this painful truth you point out.
Posted by: Fred | 01 November 2012 at 10:37 AM
Neither was Baron Munchausen's fanciful means of travel available and neither was Cassandra, or her modern echoes, the political pundits, available to tell everybody what would be happening.
Hopefully, some lessons were learned and applied to mitigate future incidents of that nature. The reality is that dangerous places are indeed dangerous.
Posted by: Lars | 01 November 2012 at 10:56 AM
"We should be talking about these factors not some Baron Muchausen nonsense about magic carpets that span the globe in an instant."
But Colonel, that doesn't fit the narrative that Obama wants to destroy America. And that "he called on the SEALS, but hung up on the SEALS when they called on him", and all the other irrelevant and untrue tripe that the wingnut Wurlitzer has been cranking out over the last few weeks.
So we can expect talk of the magic carpet gunships until 2016, and quite possibly for years after that, depending on who takes the dubious "prize" of the presidency after Obama. A job that you could not pay me enough to take on, I might add.
Posted by: The Moar You Know | 01 November 2012 at 11:01 AM
You're a good man, Basilisk.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 01 November 2012 at 11:53 AM
Not much to add to what Ignatius and PL have said about Benghazi. As my father would sometimes say, "That's where the bear shit in the buckwheat."
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 01 November 2012 at 12:03 PM
Not for me to calculate risk/benefits. Muscular hardening of diplomatic facilities and ramped up rapid manned or unmanned intervention potential sounds like a winning business strategy though.
Posted by: Charles I | 01 November 2012 at 12:45 PM
Charles, what you just asked for is not Physically possible let alone economically possible. Do yourself a favor and visit the nearest armored museum. A little old RPG easily cuts through a foot of steel.
Posted by: Walrus | 01 November 2012 at 02:14 PM
"Sometimes the national interest requires the acceptance of a lot of risk. Ask soldiers about that. Ask them that rather than chanting the meaningless mantra of your thanks at them."
This transcends the specific topic. "The national interest" and "risk" are two things most Americans don't understand, don't want to think about, and the political class does its best to keep it that way.
I'm sure it is more difficult to maintain that mental state the closer one is to "the tip of the spear." However, no doubt most soldiers are absorbed by their duties and doing what they can to manage their personal lives long-distance. How much thought do you think the typical soldier gives such topics, Colonel?
Posted by: Patrick D | 01 November 2012 at 03:03 PM
patrick D
How very condescending you are to the "common soldier." pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 01 November 2012 at 03:05 PM
Serious question, Colonel. No condescension. Just an empathetic view that they likely have their hands full with their day-to-day responsibilities even more so than the typical civilian American.
Posted by: Patrick D | 01 November 2012 at 03:15 PM
How much thought?
A great deal, since they have a lot of time on their hands.
The infantry motto is:"hurry up and wait"
Posted by: Walrus | 01 November 2012 at 05:15 PM
patrick D
Soldiers are dedicated public servants in a way that few civilians can match. Being a civilian is about taking care of number one. Being a soldier is the opposite of that. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 01 November 2012 at 05:15 PM
Space Marines to the rescue. Supported by swarms of robotic gunships also deployed from orbit! Hmm actually that sounds kinda expensive. Yeah nah.
Posted by: blue | 01 November 2012 at 05:41 PM
“There are 25 such gunships in the whole USAF.”
Indeed, and they scattered widely around the world. A number are still held here, stateside, just for training. Furthermore, although they do enjoy a very high, full mission capable status percentage, one can be sure at any given time a number of them are not mission ready.
Some will always in the midst of scheduled and unscheduled maintenance, rendering them temporarily unavailable. That is normal. And it is a real world consideration.
Posted by: John | 01 November 2012 at 06:59 PM
TTG,
I can't get over how young they all look.
Posted by: Basilisk | 01 November 2012 at 07:06 PM
basilisk
They were always young except in SF. you are just old like me. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 01 November 2012 at 07:08 PM
" you are just old like me."
Yeah, you're right about that, and lots more as well.
Posted by: Basilisk | 01 November 2012 at 07:10 PM
Basilisk
Thanks. I feel particularly old today. I am struggling with the Long Beach meeting between SL and his nephew. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 01 November 2012 at 07:14 PM
PL and Basilisk,
You guys have a few years on me, but my old injuries are "reminding me of the good times" more and more often. I'm heading down the same road you're traveling down.
My wife and I usually see at least one multiple amputee whenever we visit the Quantico Commissary. They are usually accompanied by their wives and young children. These Marines are still young, but they look a lot older than their contemporaries. I guess serious physical trauma does that.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 01 November 2012 at 10:22 PM
TTG
I was trying to be nice to Basilisk. I am leaving next week on a diving trip to Greece with someone nice. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 01 November 2012 at 11:12 PM
PL,
Pretty adventurous for an old man. You sound like the most interesting man in the world. Soon you'll be telling us to "Stay thirsty, my friends." Have a safe trip and a wonderful time.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 01 November 2012 at 11:23 PM
TTG
TMIMITW? I thought you knew. The royalty checks are useful. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 01 November 2012 at 11:58 PM
Didn't know you dived.
Posted by: Walrus | 02 November 2012 at 01:45 AM
Yes, that is also my thought each day I walk over to post to teach those who will commission.
Posted by: Clifford Kiracofe | 02 November 2012 at 07:36 AM