"The US is not losing the war in Afghanistan in the classic military sense. The US, its allies, and Afghan forces still win virtually every direct military encounter. The problem is that this is a political war where the political impact of combat, politics, governance, and economics are far more important than tactical success in directly defeating the enemy. At this level, the insurgents still seem to have significant momentum and are certainly not being decisively defeated.
Moreover, tactical military success is no guarantee of a successful Transition. The choice between victory or defeat will also center around the success or failure of the Afghan government and Afghan forces after most US and ISAF forces largely withdraw in 2014, and major cuts occur in aid and military spending. As was the case in Vietnam, the US can win every battle and still lose the war." CSIS Burke Chair
------------------------------------
All this could have been said of my biggest war, all of it. pl
The Vietnam war was lost here in the US for a number of reasons but people were intensely aware of it all the time.
No one in the US cares about the Afgan war except for the military and foreign policy junkies. No one in Tampa this week or Charlotte next week will mention it. Its lost or won and nobody cares.
Posted by: r whitman | 29 August 2012 at 12:45 PM
On the subject of a war -- but unrelated to this Afghan issue -- an unexploded, 500 pound bomb was discovered about 5 km from the downtown square in Munich, Germany in the area of the university when construction was being done. It supposedly had a delayed chemical fuse and was of American manufacture, according to the person who told me yesterday. The Germans thought that it could not safely be defused, and so a "controlled explosion" was done.
http://www.sueddeutsche.de/muenchen/fliegerbombe-in-muenchen-gesprengt-kein-auge-hab-ich-zugetan-die-ganze-nacht-nicht-1.1452868
http://www.sueddeutsche.de/panorama/weltkriegsbomben-in-staedten-gefahr-die-im-boden-schlummert-1.1453406
This is not an isolated instance, as unexploded ordnance is still being found in Germany from World War II.
Posted by: robt willmann | 29 August 2012 at 01:03 PM
There is an entire French Army unit that is dedicated to the task of finding and defusing unexploded ordnance from WWI and WWII in France.
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 29 August 2012 at 01:43 PM
I've read somewhere recently that French farmers are still finding artillery shells from WWI.
Posted by: Fred | 29 August 2012 at 01:51 PM
The holder of the Burke Chair is a serious, intelligent man. That it's taken 11 years for him to recognize this elementary yet central point is all the commentary we need as to how the United States has gone off the rails.
Posted by: mbrenner | 29 August 2012 at 02:27 PM
mbrenner
Yes, it is also am medication of the profound corruption to thinking wrought by government consulting and contracts. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 29 August 2012 at 02:37 PM
I thought CSIS was also supported by the Government of Saudi Arabia, yes?
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 29 August 2012 at 05:17 PM
It's hard to believe that the CSIS report is the state of the art in analysis. A competent undergrad could have written it. Surely there is better.
Posted by: bth | 29 August 2012 at 10:34 PM
bth
It's nothing special but it does the job. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 29 August 2012 at 10:38 PM
I have read the summary at the link above, and not the whole report. While a realistic assessment of the present dire situation (including, refreshingly, the realization that much of this mess is due to faulty assessments and reporting from the theatre), it indulges in pie-in-the-sky fantasy when proposing a future corrected course of action.
His suggestion that the US get improved Afghan performance by threatening to pull out completely is comical!
He also clings to the notion that the US can leave behind a viable Afghan national army and police. The 'green on blue' attacks have put paid to that possibility, far fetched as it was to start with. They have initiated a vicious cycle that will effectively kill this program (three Australian soldiers were killed in one of these attacks today).
Posted by: FB Ali | 29 August 2012 at 10:43 PM
The originally implicit and later explicit assumption in this piece is that there is such a thing as the "Afghan people." Afghanistan is a geographical expression, the detritus of four empires.
Posted by: jmc5588 | 30 August 2012 at 02:37 AM
What is the feasibility of this thread producing a more realistic strategy and outline of action? I think the situation is pretty well known, but practical and realistic next steps seem to be largely missing from the national discussion - what little there is.
Posted by: bth | 30 August 2012 at 07:48 AM
There was a WWII bomb in the Danube near Vienna that exploded this week. Every month or so in Austria or Germany, a bomb is found during construction.
Posted by: oofda | 30 August 2012 at 09:16 AM
Years ago, NATO states defined Afghanistan as her sand box. That is another inherent weakness of their position.
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 30 August 2012 at 09:37 AM
bth
The reasonable, practicable strategy is to withdraw our forces altogether from Afghanistan and continue to pursue the jihadis on a world wide basis without occupying any more Muslim land. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 30 August 2012 at 11:08 AM
jmc5588
absolutely correct. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 30 August 2012 at 11:09 AM
Spot on - as always, Colonel!
Posted by: McGee | 30 August 2012 at 12:39 PM
Five Australian soldiers killed in Afghanistan yesterday.
What a waste.
Posted by: Walrus | 30 August 2012 at 03:30 PM
What is the goal?
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 30 August 2012 at 03:51 PM
I love the solution to UXB's adopted by the natives in New Guinea: - They build a log fire over it and retire to a safe distance to watch the fun.
Posted by: Walrus | 30 August 2012 at 05:13 PM
I remember reading a comment by a soldier/historian Col. Harry Summers who described meeting an NVA general after the
Vietnam war. Summers pointed out that we had never lost a battle in the field. The NVA general said that was true - but was also irrelevant since they won the war.
People who were there really understand the truth of the comment.
I think the same thing applies to Afghanistan where I believe the slogan is, "You have watches, but we have the time."
Posted by: John Adamson | 31 August 2012 at 12:27 AM
It's a shame that we didn't use the killing of OBL to declare victory and leave.
Posted by: bth | 31 August 2012 at 12:44 AM
John Adamson
It was an NVA colonel. That's what Harry told me. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 31 August 2012 at 01:06 AM
Yes, an Agricultural society clashing with an Industrial society.
For an Industrial society, war, like everything else, must be run according to time tables and schedules.
For an Agricultural one, wars will be fought based on seasons; and there is always time....
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 31 August 2012 at 10:30 AM