"The price of gasoline has dropped to a five-month low, giving drivers some relief ahead of the July 4 holiday.
The national average fell to around $3.40 per gallon on Tuesday. South Carolina, at $2.987, has the distinction of being the first state with an average below $3 since February 2011. Even in states that impose high gas taxes, such as New York and California, pump prices are averaging less that $4.
Americans are now spending roughly $200 million per day less on gas than in early April, when gas peaked at $3.94 per gallon. And analysts are expecting further declines. One economist on Tuesday forecast the national average will soon fall to $3.10 per gallon." Yahoo News
--------------------------------------------------
I think it will go lower. Gasoline prices are not determined by world wide supply and demand. There is no short term shortage of crude oil. Forces internal to the markets are largely responsible for price movements. These forces are the result of attempts by traaders to outguess each other in forecasting price movements.
I may have mentioned that a couple of weeks ago gasoline bought from major oil companies in the Harrisonburg, Virginia area was selling for 70 cents per gallon cheaper than the same product in the Washington, DC area. Why is that?. Gasoline is not produced in the Shenandoah Valley. It must be trandported there in tanker trucks. This, obviously adds to the cost. I conclude from this phenomenon that the oil companies are pricing products at what they think the ttraffic will bear.
Look for a big drop in prices before the November election. That might do it for BHO. pl
http://news.yahoo.com/us-gasoline-prices-cheapest-since-january-151415588--finance.html
Off the bat, I can think of two reason for the price disparity between the Shenandoah valley and NOVA.
Overhead; rent, insurance, etc. is most likely higher in NOVA than Harrisonburg.
Geography; Yes, refiners - just like supermarkets - price for what the market will bear.
Posted by: TWV | 27 June 2012 at 08:55 AM
This welcome news . I own a one man & van charter business -and the savings this past month for my E 350 ten seater here in Central Texas have been put into the 'going fishing fund ".
Posted by: Alba Etie | 27 June 2012 at 09:01 AM
To reinforce (I think) the colonel's point: Oil (and other commodities') prices depend on mass psyche much more than actual supply and demand. Most of these goods are traded not so much in actual products but contracts dated far in advance, and anticipation of shortages or just plain mass fear leads both legitimate consumers (of the product--e.g. refiners and various users) and speculators to hoard these contracts. It is still a function of supply and demand, but "demand" in this case is generated more by psychology and self-fulfilling prophecy than by any immediate "need to consume."
Posted by: kao_hsien_chih | 27 June 2012 at 10:16 AM
The Colonial Pipeline and its spurs goes right through the valley thus a possible reason for the disparity in pricing.
My concern is that oil will drop to less than $2.00 per gallon which will bring on a whole lot of other problems. Always be careful on wishing for which Gift Horse you want.
Posted by: Bobo | 27 June 2012 at 10:48 AM
You mean the American public is so narrow-minded that vote for BHO just because the gasoline is cheaper?? That can’t be :)
Posted by: tony | 27 June 2012 at 12:39 PM
tony
"That can’t be." Funny pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 27 June 2012 at 12:44 PM
Don't get your hopes up. Right now there is a surplus of crude at the terminals in the US and surplus refining capacity. It will not go on forever. Something will come along to screw it up. A big refinery outage or saber rattling by the Israelis and Iranians or something else out of the clear blue.
You cannot make predictions based on linear data in a non-linear world and expect accurate results.
Posted by: r whitman | 27 June 2012 at 01:06 PM
r. whitman
"You cannot make predictions based on linear data in a non-linear world and expect accurate results." I never do. I consder the data, eliminate the improbable and then guess. I am mostly right. It's my feminine side at work. I'm like the cowboy in a bar who chats up a dishy woman only to be told that she is a lesbian, that all she wants is women and thinks about them all the time. Another comes in, equally toothsome and after a while she asks what he is. His response is that he used to think he was a cowboy but now he knows that he is a lesbian. Claude and I are like that. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 27 June 2012 at 01:14 PM
I would disagree. There is easy financial manipulation of supply. (Refiner outages, storage removed from service, etc; just as Enron did in California in 2000. It is market manipulation (un-regulated). That drives the pricing, not consumer fear.
Posted by: Fred | 27 June 2012 at 02:09 PM
Following up on your post on civility I must say I'm not sure if 'my, my' or roflmao is the right resonse to your follow up to r.whitman; how about both?
Posted by: Fred | 27 June 2012 at 02:12 PM
hmmmm...is that what some people refer to (personality-wise) as "integrated?"
Posted by: rjj du Nord | 27 June 2012 at 03:03 PM
rjj du Nord
Could be, I was born like that. Claude and I have discussed it with his father and grandfather. The grandfather said he was like that too. Charles (the father) said we were sick and irresponsible. Hope came in later to say that we were all losers and that she was sticking with Smoot. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 27 June 2012 at 03:12 PM
1., The Iran war premium has disppeared for the time being, means approx $10-15 per barrel
2., The world is getting closer and closer to a system wide dperession [notwithstnding US data manipulation re GDP, Unemeployment etc, similar issues to a smaller effect are in China, India etc].
3., most people follow Saudi oil production, and disregard Saudi export, the first is rising, the second rising lot slower.
4., Hopefullyy this is not the start of the same issues as arose when the price dropped from $140 to somewhere around $40.
Posted by: N M salamon | 27 June 2012 at 03:28 PM
Here are an interesting couple of sources that support the claims made above.
Re "Forces internal to the markets are largely responsible for price movements."
Michael Greenberger, former Director of the Division of Trading and Markets at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, has been making this case for some time:
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/04/04/144181/finance-expert-says-speculators.html
Re "There is no short term shortage of crude oil."
A recent survey of every oil field in the world concludes that the largest boom in oil production since the 1980s is currently underway:
http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/Oil-%20The%20Next%20Revolution.pdf
Summarized here:
http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/25/a-fresh-look-at-oils-new-boom-time/
An interesting detail: the study finds that the most plausible scenario is of the US being the second largest oil producer in the world (after SA) by 2020.
Posted by: Dan Gackle | 27 June 2012 at 03:49 PM
How does one eliminate the improbable ?
Posted by: Alba Etie | 27 June 2012 at 04:05 PM
Bet Claude, Hope, et al. have met some of my v. close associates from the same sector of The Ont.
Posted by: rjj du Nord | 27 June 2012 at 04:25 PM
I WANT to read those books. For the past few years have read nothing but history - mostly 20th C. Wars and memoirs - plus a few other things. No fiction - except the one or two Le Carre published in that period.
Seems there is to be a relocation to North Carolina (via California). That will bump them to the top of the list.
Posted by: rjj du Nord | 27 June 2012 at 04:34 PM
Does being a lesbian make the gasoline cheaper??
Posted by: r whitman | 27 June 2012 at 04:42 PM
No surprise that oil retailers charge what the market will bear, free of any restraint of a free market.
Senator Maria Cantwell recently asked the FTC to investigate why oil prices were increasing in Washington while they were decreasing in the rest of the country. Apparently, there was a fire at a West Coast refinery. In response, other refiners DECREASED output.
Most of the Fortune 500 now consists of shared monopolies, where a market leader often sets prices and other companies follow. By setting prices above the free market level, they all profit. For example, Barclay's just got convicted of fixing LIBOR rates.
Such oligopolistic behavior helps explain why profits and salaries of the largest companies are so outrageous, even in the worst of times. If demand drops, they simply raise prices to cover the shortfall. Alternatively, they cut service to drop costs.
There is nothing earth shaking here. It's all explained as part of any college level Economics 101 (or at least used to be when I went to school.) Given the prevalence of monopolistic behavior, understanding this should be required of anyone graduating high school.
Only then can something be done about it.
Posted by: JohnH | 27 June 2012 at 04:58 PM
r. whitman
Could be, you might try it. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 27 June 2012 at 05:10 PM
tjj
The transplant people? Claude became tired of us all and left in search of the Whitman woman. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 27 June 2012 at 05:11 PM
rjj
There are a few left on the market. There are no vampires in them. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 27 June 2012 at 05:20 PM
du Nord, get them and read them. Judging by your listed reading preferences, I would wager that you will enjoy them immensely... and you will gain a rich group of acquaintances.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 27 June 2012 at 05:52 PM
TTG
I can't get them to shut up and go away. Now they are elbowing their way into the new book. Jim Lewis and Jeff Shields showed up yesterday to say that they should be Does anyone know?in TDS. I am trying to rememmber which of them was a slave. Lewis sais that since he led sorrel in the funeral he muct be a main character. Too bed you weren't on the trip. did you read "targets?" pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 27 June 2012 at 06:02 PM
Humor the bastards or they will turn surly and unionize (just for the pun of it) - they are outside of time where anachronism is only the artifact of a point of view.
Posted by: rjj du Nord | 27 June 2012 at 07:11 PM