I confess to having been less than impressed with Professor Gates during the Gates/Cambridge cop "crisis" of a few years back. I don't think it was his finest moment. Neither was it the president's finest moment, now repeated in the Zimmerman/Martin affair.
I never knew a lot about my ancestry. There were bits and pieces of family mythology. Much of this has proven to be wrong in the light of my wife's commitment to genealogical research centered on the internet. Incidentally, if you have a subscription to "ancestry.com," you can access our "tree." It is the Lang/Lessard tree.
From my wife's research I learned that contrary to family myth my family had no Indian blood, were evidently ardent Abolitionists who served in the Union Army, and were afflicted with the "wandering gene" that drove them from the eastern seaboard in New England and New France in the early 17th Century to the Pacific rim of North America by 1900.
I have a continuing political "problem" with those who have mixed emotions involving at least some loyalty to the "old country (ies)" For that reason I asked my wife to see if she could find me a rabbi or two among the centuries. So far, no luck.
Now we have these two television progams devoted to genealogy. I think they are marvelous. What they demonstrate is the pattern of relations and richness of our North American people. There is a certain amount of picking and choosing in the "lines" researched on the shows, but ground truth is emerging about the people who are featured and the people they came from.
It should be said that I am adamant in thinking that one's outcome in life should not be governed by ancestry, and indeed, WASPness has become a bit of a hindrance.
IMO, race relationships between "Black" and "White" Americans are the central themes of US history just as the WBS is the central set of events. I know that some think that the ratification of the Constitution brought an end to anything but US national history, but I disagree. William Falukner sided with me. We are a majority. Democracy rules. Read "The Bear" for a start in understanding, Read all of " The Bear."
It is amusing that some of the subjects prefer parts of their ancestry to other parts. Kyra Sedgwick prefers her mother's Jewish family to that of her father's Puritan Yankee Sedgwick line. African-Americans generally do not seem to want a face put on their European ancestors. This is foolish. We are who we are.
Doctor Gates seems to have an agenda. I think it is a good agenda. He seems to want us all, ALL, to acknowledge the truth about how complicated the past really is and that even though many things in the past, like slavery, were bad, everything that happened then was not bad. He also wants us to know that people are complex and very capable of doing things that seem mutually inreconcilable. Lincoln was like that. As late as 1862 he told Black leaders that they should go "home" to Africa when liberated.
The programs that involve Black people are the most significant. Gates demonstrates through DNA scholarship that almost all African-Americans are significantly White and often at least half white. Hardly any of them have any significant amount of Indian blood. We are not two peoples, "Black and White." We are one people.
Black reaction to this "news" varies from the sublime to the absurd. It has been demonstrated in some of these programs that some Black subjects had ancestors who owned slaves, or who were free people before the American Revolutionm (and owned slaves) or who served with the Confederate forces as civilian employees and drew pensions from the former Rebel states for that service.
Reaction from Blacks has been mostly disappointing. The best was that of the sublime John Lewis, Democrat of Georgia, who learned that the owner of his Civil War era ancestors left substantial resources to his former slaves in his will stating that "my own children can make their way, but these must be provided for..." (paraphrasing). When asked by Gates why the man would have done that, Lewis said, "Well, they were family..." The most egregious Black reaction I have seen thus far was that of Lionel Richie who, when he "learned " that a really distinguished ancestor had been both a founder of a major Black welfare group and a recipient of a Confederate pension from Tennessee, simply did not take note of the Confederate part of the story. In fact the ancestor was with the Confederate Army as a contract employee as "servant" (orderly) for a White man named, "Morgan Brown" who was either his father or his half brother. The "Black" ancestor served for four years with the Confederate Army of Tennessee. Such employees were normally armed and uniformed. They could have deserted whenenever they wished. In recounting this story to his children in the presence of his Italian looking sister, Richie just ignored the white ancestors. Shame over rape? Well, if that works for you, so be it.
BTW, the sevrice of such Black Confederates is now well documented by such scholars as Dr. Edward Smith of American University. How many were there? I estimate the number as around 10,000.
The most disappointing reaction of all was that of the White people in Louisiana who would not submit to a DNA test to confirm their relationship to Dr. Canada, the public schools chief in New York City. For shame! The truth shall make us free,
Keep it up Dr. Gates. I would call you, "Skip," but would not presume. pl
http://www.nbc.com/who-do-you-think-you-are/
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/finding-your-roots/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Louis_Gates
Back in the late fifties my mother and one of her sisters went on a trip to find their ancestors up on both sides of the Canadian border. They found that most were, like yours, from New England and New France. Except for one, whose gravestone on the Canadian side read "Freeborn" for his (or her) given name, same family name and buried in a family plot. Mom always taunted my Virginia born father with her dark heritage. My sisters claim - without proof - that Freeborn was probably an indentured servant from Olde Englande. Maybe so or maybe not, but I like to drive my sisters crazy with it, calling them ultra-high-yellow when they give me a hard time. Black acquaintances are not impressed with my story. I understand why.
Posted by: mike | 15 April 2012 at 02:06 PM
My paternal uncle did intense research on our family which is what led me to learn that the Figg's of County Clare and the Everetsen's of Stevanger, Norway made there way here in search of a better life. The Figg's had a father and son on the Confederate Side and a son on the Union side. A cousin on my mother's side has done equally extensive work and the most interesting thing I find from her side was that her grandfather was killed in the mines in DuQuoin, Illinois the day that Archeduke Ferdinand was assassinated.
Posted by: Mj | 15 April 2012 at 05:07 PM
Research on my family background has turned up some Langs... well, Laing anyway. Forbes Laing out of Glasgow, born 1822. Their daughter, Margaret, married and wound up in San Francisco in the late 1800's. More digging around turned up a Command Sgt Major Company C, 5th SF Group, 1st SF retired out in ...where else.. Fayetteville.
Small and endlessly surprising world.
Posted by: Paul Deavereaux | 15 April 2012 at 09:07 PM
Thanks for this Col. It's one of the finest things you've posted on this blog, outside your accustomed domain of foreign and military policy, and your own fiction.
"...and only Sam and Old Ben and the mongrel Lion were taintless and incorruptible ."
Posted by: Amileoj | 16 April 2012 at 01:30 AM
We're all pretty related; for most of the history of the human race there simply haven't been that many people to be different from.
Posted by: The Moar You Know | 16 April 2012 at 10:40 AM
An old story. Family found out that a relative in the wild old west was a horse thief, spent time in jail, bank robber, spent more time in jail, horse thief, was hung.
They cleaned all that up by describing him as a person who traded horses, spent some time working for the government, went into the banking business, then more time working for the government, then went back to horse trading. At a public celebration held in his honer, the reviewing stand collapsed and he was killed.
Posted by: MikeB | 16 April 2012 at 01:03 PM
Dr. Gates really has done a great job...and a needed job with this show. My husband and I are completely hooked. What it seems to demonstrate, in fact, is what it really means to be an American. Last night's was about 3 faith traditions and family history...and how being in America and becoming American allowed each family to flourish within their own choice of faith. It was an absolutely resounding fanfare for our unique idea of the separation of Church and State. Thomas Jefferson would have LOVED IT!
Posted by: Laura Wilson | 16 April 2012 at 07:09 PM