"What we’re seeing now in Egypt is something that might be called electoral bin Ladenism. Take the group Gamaa Islamiya, which under its spiritual leader, Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, made the first unsuccessful attempt to destroy the World Trade Center in 1993. Today, the organization has formed a Salafist political party with the benign name Building and Development Party. This organization, which like al-Qaeda traces its roots to the Islamist theorist Sayyid Qutb, has 13 seats in the new Egyptian parliament.
Syria will be a test of whether this post-bin Laden Islamist movement can continue to reject violence or will instead be radicalized by the jihadist magnet that is Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. The successor to bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri, has tried to use the anti-Assad battle to rehabilitate the al-Qaeda brand — even though it’s another fight that embodies the Muslim-on-Muslim violence that bin Laden came to abhor." Ignatius
*******************************
"... a year of mostly nonviolent democratic revolution. But it has brought to power some Salafist and Muslim Brotherhood groups that share common theological roots with bin Laden. And the al-Qaeda goal of driving the “apostate,” pro-American President Hosni Mubarak from power has been achieved." Ignatius
---------------------------------------
Truer words were never..., etc. Islamic revivalism (especially in Sunni Islam) is a cyclical phenomenon. Islam sees itself as a universal truth that should become a way of life for all. All else is tactics.
The fervor for an active pursuit of God's Kingdom on earth ebbs and flows with the tides of world history. Every hundred tears or so since the failure of the Ottomans before Vienna a new generation has arisen willing to try the issue at arms with the West, Islam's principal rival in the contest for the souls and obedience of men. In our days, AQ became the standard bearer for this effort. AQ has largely been defeated but that does not mean that Sunni Islamic revivalism has been defeated.
The "Arab Spring," like the "Arab Awakening " written of so pationately by George Antonius, was to a large extent the result of the influence of Western elites sympathetic to the "causes" of "authenticity" in the Islamic World and a standard of purity of behavior that does not exist in their own countries.
In the "Arab Spring," bemused by the presence in the Middle Eastern countries of amall acculturated minorities of leftists who "talked the talk," of Western political values, the academic, media and governmental elites of the West collaborated in the destreuction of the Old Regimes in various states. They continue ot hope for more downfalls in places like Syria, Bahrein and Saudi Arabia. These Western encouragements for what they see as modernity in the Easterm polities have about them the odor of university bull sessions with Ivory Tower ignorance as a basis. At the same time, the Western elites are incredibly vulnerable to the self serving views of Middle Easterners who have their agendas and delusions.
In Egypt, a great "political" crash is coming when the generals have to face the fact that the various Islamist parties are merely a continuation of AQ's jihad by other means. If the MB, Nur or some combination of Islamist groups achieve effective control of Egypt, the generals are finished as a group. There will be other generals in that future but they will be Islamist generals. pl
Col. Lang:
You wrote:
"...as a universal truth that should become a way of life for all.".
I think you are missing the point: they do not want to think, they want to put their minds - as well as the minds of their fellow-country men & co-religionists - on auto-pilot and return to the slumber of the last 1000 years.
They will fail no doubt, but not without first being kicked very hard by a thing called Reality which will break them and disabuse them of their fanciful notions.
Many people will suffer as a consequence, but there is no other way - one cannot live other people's history for them.
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 29 April 2012 at 01:51 PM
Babak
This is a distinction without a difference. You are just being argumentative. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 29 April 2012 at 01:56 PM
No!
Catholics believe the same thing - that their religion is applicable to the entire world and it has the Cannon Law to support it.
The difference lies in a thing called Christian Philosophical Tradition.
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 29 April 2012 at 02:03 PM
Babak
The word is "canon." Yes, Catholicism also believes in its own universality, but there has not been a serious revivialism since the counter-reformation. Perhaps Opus Dei is beginning one. I am sure you know of the Islamic religious disciplines; Quranic exegesis, hadith, philosophy, fiqh, kalam, etc. So, what are you talking about? pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 29 April 2012 at 02:10 PM
Religious Philosophy, i.e. Reason trying to understand Revelation, has been dead in Sunni Islam for a thousand years.
That is all I meant.
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 29 April 2012 at 02:15 PM
The "Arab Spring," like the "Arab Awakening " written of so pationately by George Antonius, was to a large extent the result of the influence of Western elites sympathetic to the "causes" of "authenticity" in the Islamic World and a standard of purity of behavior that does not exist in their own countries.
COL - I find it interesting that you attribute the Arab Spring so much to Western forces. I disagree that Western forces could have gotten millions of Egyptians out in force into the streets to convince the Army to oust Mubarak in the way that they did. Can you go into why you think outside forces are ultimately responsible?
Posted by: tequila | 29 April 2012 at 02:17 PM
tequila
These populations were cowed and inert politically under the "boot" of their native oppressors until the Bush and Obama Administrations and their acolytes told them they should revolt and then they did. Previously, although unrest and fighting frequently went on in these countries, it was easily "handled" or resulted an a change of "deck chairs." You seriously underestimate the value of endorsement and encouragement by the
"greatest power in history." From a lifetime of experience I can tell you that the Arabs generally think Washington is the new Rome. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 29 April 2012 at 03:49 PM
Babak
You are not getting away so easily. You know that Sunni revivalism is all about pietism and ijma' inside one of their sects. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 29 April 2012 at 03:52 PM
What makes guys come out of their cubicle's and give interviews like this one, which does us no good at all? No matter pro or con this just makes us look like a bunch of yahoos....
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-57423533/hard-measures-ex-cia-head-defends-post-9-11-tactics/?tag=re1.discussed
Posted by: Jake | 30 April 2012 at 08:36 AM
Jake et al
I agree with Jeff Stein that Rodriquez' remarks sound better in the original German. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 30 April 2012 at 08:40 AM
So PL and others would you argue 9/11/01 was a tactical or strategic victory for UBL? Or one or the other?
Posted by: William R. Cumming | 30 April 2012 at 08:48 AM
WRC
I would say that 9/11 was a tactical victory for the violent jihadists that has led to strategic defeat. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 30 April 2012 at 08:50 AM
Strategic defeat for whom? "I would say that 9/11 was a tactical victory for the violent jihadists that has led to strategic defeat." pl
Two costly and foolish wars, ingrained violations of Constitutional rights (including Executive assassinations, universal surveillance of Americans, institutionalized torture) in the name of a perpetual "war on terror". Secrets of the state maintained by appeal to "national security" used to shield the Executive branch from prosecution.
We walked away of the rule of law in response to the attack and that spells defeat to a Constitutional republic.
Posted by: Marcus | 30 April 2012 at 09:31 AM
Marcus
I see your point but from the viewpoint of the jihadists they have lost. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 30 April 2012 at 09:34 AM
Thanks PL and Marcus!
One small detail perhaps unimportant from any standpoint reflected by the academic literature since 9/11/01 is that the Economics profession cannot agree on the direct and indirect economic losses caused by the strikes on the Pentagon and WTC. UBl himself used the figure of $500B in direct damages caused by a $500K expenditure.
What is now pretty well knows is the impact on the property/casualty insurance business. And the federal terrorism insurance program marches on located in the US Treasury and under a current statutory extension until 2013.
Posted by: William R. Cumming | 30 April 2012 at 10:01 AM
Until the rise of the next charismatic terror leader. At the risk of being accused of giving material aid to these crazies, 'I feel their pain'.
The idiocy of the response to the attack on US could not have been scripted better to induce hatred and revenge in the hearts of the young disaffected radical Islamist.
Posted by: Marcus | 30 April 2012 at 10:02 AM
This Youtube video sums up the economics perfectly. An Iraqi "insurgent" fires a $10 round from a $100 82mm mortar at an American base.
A $15 million C-RAM system responds with ammunition at a cost of about $150 per second (say $5 per round at 2000 rpm)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAK22XkEa-o
Posted by: Walrus | 30 April 2012 at 02:47 PM
Mr Makkinejad
My knowledge of Islam is very small -but there are Moslem I have met in Central Texas that contend that what Islam needs is its own 'Martin Luther' .
Is it not a possibilty that same day a reformation may happen between the Sunni & Shia ?
When I review what I learned years ago about the European Religious Wars -after great difficulty the different Christians camps learned to co-exist without warfare. ( Setting aside the present actors such as the End of Dayers & the Dominionist-- I recall that Timothy McVeigh was a member of some white only Radical Christian cult too .)
Regarding India-- it seems to me that the modern Indian State has become more pluralistic and responsive to internal political pressure- for example the Naxolites appear to be making some progress in the political proccess rather then insurrection . And it looks as if there may be actual results accruing fron the behind the scene talks with the Indian & Pakistani government - in spite of the LET and the Mumbai attack ,
The cup is half full & not half empty perhaps ?
Posted by: Alba Etie | 01 May 2012 at 07:09 AM
Alba Etie
Every Muslim has his own Islam. Do some reading and we can have a serious discussion. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 01 May 2012 at 09:17 AM
Thank you for your comments.
I do not believe that Reformation was either necessary or an unmitigated success.
By weakening the power of Catholic Church, it smoothed the way to the formation of Nation-States in Northern and Western Europe which, in effect, created new gods upon whose altar millions were murdered.
Be as it may, the Reformation, as far as I can understand it, was a project that challenged the legitimacy of the Catholic Church as the central authority of (Western) Christians.
Such an analogy does not obtain in Islam, there is no central authority. The closest is the collection of doctors of Religious Sciences of Islam among the Shia in Qum and Najaf and among the Sunnis in Al Azhar University. But these do not in any way shape or form approximate the Church: “On you (Peter) I will build my Church.”
The possibility of reform exists however, but for that both the Shia and Sunni political and religious leaders must, in my opinion, follow and further develop the ideas of the late Ayatollah Khomeini. His thoughts are, in my opinion, the best hope of a successful response by Muslims to the Modern World.
I mentioned Hindus only as a counter example to the technology fetish that so many people seem to believe would bring in a fundamental change in the thinking of people. Specifically about Hindis, I think Islam has had a more positive influence on them – over the centuries – than cell-phones; whatever form of charity there is in India that is practiced by Hindus is due to Muslim influence.
I was not suggesting that the glass is half-full or half-empty, to use your analogy.
Only that one cannot put water in the glass in the manner suggested and certainly not in a time-frame that is less than 3 or 4 generations (60 to 80 years).
Posted by: Babak Makkinejad | 01 May 2012 at 01:39 PM
Col Lang
Which two books would you recommend first on Islam.
Thank you
Posted by: Alba Etie | 07 May 2012 at 06:18 AM
AE
Read "The Venture of Islam" 3 volumes - papaerback. pl
Posted by: turcopolier | 07 May 2012 at 07:30 AM