First, let's go over a little history. The 10th Special Forces Group (10th SFGA) was activated in 1952 under the command of Colonel Aaron Bank, a veteran of the OSS and a Jedburgh Team leader advising and leading resistance forces in occupied France. Colonel Bank organized and trained the 10th SFGA to conduct unconventional warfare (UW) in the occupied countries of Eastern Europe. Specifically the Group's teams were prepared to develop, organize and direct indigenous resistance forces in the conduct of guerrilla warfare. This beginning is reflected in the SF motto "De Oppresso Liber" (Liberate From Oppression). To this day, SF training is focused on this mission.
Since those early days, the SF mission expanded to include counter insurgency operations, direct action missions and training foreign. However, SF organization and training is still focused on the UW mission. In the final exercise for both officers and enlisted candidates for SF, the students are inserted into the fictitious "Republic of Pineland" to develop, organize and direct an indigenous resistance force in the conduct of guerrilla warfare. Recall the paper written by Major Gant to see how this mindset remains in SF.
What to Do:
I'm certain there are SFODAs (SF Operational Detachment Alpha) that have planned and trained for employment in Libya to support guerilla operations. But given our decade long preoccupation with Iraq and Afghanistan, those teams may not be immediately available or not immediately ready to move into Libya. On the other hand, I'm sure there are teams with Arabic and desert training ready to go in the 3rd, 5th or 10th Groups. The headquarters for the operation would probably be in Stuttgart, Germany where EUCOM, AFRICOM and, conveniently enough, 1st Battalion, 10th SFGA are located. An assessment/ command team should be immediately inserted into Benghazi to make contact with the Libyan resistance. In a previous post I alluded to the difficulty and criticality of this initial contact. How this team will be received is unknown. However, I am getting the impression that the resistance forces initial euphoria is being tempered by the realization that they have a difficult struggle ahead of them. This assessment team will serve as liaison to the resistance leadership and a command element to the SFODAs to follow. The assessment team will determine the size, abilities and needs of the resistance fighting forces and relay this information to Stuttgart so the SFODAs can properly prepare for their insertion. The ODAs will be in isolation intensively preparing for their insertion and mission execution.
An ODA can usually train, advise and/or lead a battalion to regimental size force. In addition to a couple of ODAs in Benghazi organizing the main resistance forces, I would insert an ODA each in Zawiyah and Misrata to shore up the resistance in those areas. I could envision SF troops working to break up armored assaults by Qathafi's forces on these two areas while using the resistance forces for supporting fires similar to the Hizbollah regulars did in the last dust up in Lebanon. Holding these two areas would keep pressure on Qathafi and give time for the main resistance forces around Benghazi to organize. As I write this, I am watching a report of former Libyan soldiers in the Benghazi area preparing captured equipment and training youths for military action so things are already moving in the right direction. The ODAs can also direct any air or naval support that may or may not be available. That would be a tremendous force multiplier and would IMHO pretty much guarantee that Qathafi's forces would not be able to overrun the resistance. The taking of Tripoli will still be a tough nut to crack. The SF troops could ensure that the final battle is done smartly and with patience rather than seeing an angry armed mob just surging toward the palace and getting themselves slaughtered.
The author is known here as "The Twisted Genius" (TTG) He wrote this on behalf of Aaron Bank's Children
Col. Lang can correct me, but I read in a blog that 1st Battalion is preoccupied with the Hizbollah menace to Western Civilization.
Posted by: Jose | 01 March 2011 at 10:23 PM
The Shia of Lebanon still have a score to settle with Qa-tha-fi over the disappearance of Musa_al-Sadr.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musa_al-Sadr
I would bet some have made their way to the Baqr (Cyrenaica) with the latest RPG's and Resistance know-how.
Posted by: WILL | 02 March 2011 at 12:04 AM
Baffling that such assessment teams are not already on the ground. Could it be that SAS or some other country has taken on the task?
Among SF skill sets, are there those whose specializations include assistance in organizing civil structures - like communications and distribution?
Posted by: smoke | 02 March 2011 at 12:13 AM
Is it entirely incorrect to use the Falkland Islands as an analogy? The Argentine troops were accustomed to fighting civilians. Confronted with people who shot back, they only lasted week or so.
Posted by: arbogast | 02 March 2011 at 02:08 AM
Comment from the ground (for whatever it's worth). The civilians playing house at the courthouse here in Benghazi, by and large, would not welcome an obvious US military presence. Don't know if that really matters.
In my more limited contact with officers, I get the feeling that what Col. Lang outlines would be very much welcomed, if handled deftly. They seem very well aware that low-levels of training leave there soldiers, as of now, no match for Qaddafi's people in Tripoli and definitely would view the shabaab marching on Tripoli as lambs to the slaughter, a true children's crusade.
The one thing I wonder about US involvement is the politics. In Eastern Europe, we were the enemy of the great oppressor. Here we're often viewed as pals with the oppressor -- and as kind of weak. (I had a Libyan doctor shouting at me the other day. "You forgave Qaddafi Lockerbie for money? What's the price-tag on forgiving Bin Laden?" Was the gist of it. Incredulous and scornful).
There's a billboard not far from where I'm sitting that says something like "No foreign intervention. Libyans can do this on our own." But when you talk to soldiers and youths eager to sign up, weapons and training would be viewed as "help" and not "intervention" it seems. As each day goes on, the reality that victory won't be quick is setting in, and my guess is that calls for "help" will get louder.
Dan, Benghazi
Posted by: DanM | 02 March 2011 at 02:20 AM
Who wrote this post?
Posted by: William R. Cumming | 02 March 2011 at 06:05 AM
1. "The recapture of Brega came as rebel leaders in Libya called for international military intervention to help topple Gaddafi, saying they believe that people power alone may not be enough to dislodge the dictator from his last remaining strongholds."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/01/AR2011030106071.html
2. So far, it seems to me among the "Libyan" voices for non-intervention there is a UK Twitter feed seemingly by some well-intentioned youth-students: @shabablibya for example.
Some folks on the ground in Libya now seem to be taking a rather different view. One would imagine this view will become more pronounced with further counterattcks from Q's side.
UK and German special forces have already been in Libya on rescue operations as reported in the press.
3. WWII? Irregulars and UW?
The level of understanding in Congress about WWII (or even WWI) was indicated by the removal of the "French Fries" signs in Capitol Hill food service areas during the Iraq War. This was in response to the French President warning against an invasion by the US. The Neocons screamed against "the French" but naturally Richard Perle was enjoying the pool at his French second home in the Dordogne.
The WWII French Resistance? Doubtful anyone on the Hill has the slightest clue or has met a genuine member of the authentic French Resistance.
Posted by: Clifford Kiracofe | 02 March 2011 at 07:19 AM
WRC
One of our regulars. He can identify himself if he wishes to do so. pl
Posted by: Patrick Lang | 02 March 2011 at 08:56 AM
Thanks PL!
Posted by: William R. Cumming | 02 March 2011 at 09:30 AM
The march across the desert from the east to the west seems impossible, but that growing fleet could pick up a few thousand Libyan rebel hitchikers and drop them off at a rebel established and fleet protected beachhead in a suburb of Tripoli after a reasonablel period of hunger and deprivation in the capital. We could loan them some onboard training and give them some guns for their adventure.
It is probably better that the Libyans do their own dirty work. Perhaps MQ's mercenaries are much like the Argentine troops mentioned by Arborgast. If the mercenaries use their brains, they will just go home with their gold rather than to fight to the last.
In the end, my guess is that MQ do a Mussolini and will likely end up with the same fate.
Posted by: WP | 02 March 2011 at 09:46 AM
WRC, I, The Twisted Genius, wrote this in response to Colonel Lang's call for papers on UW in Libya.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 02 March 2011 at 09:50 AM
Aaron and DanM,
Thank you for these insights. Please keep writing.
Posted by: Douglass Schmacher | 02 March 2011 at 09:57 AM
smoke,
The ODA organization includes specialists in medicine, combat engineering, communications, all manner of weapons and the full range of military staff functions. The knowledge, skills and abilities inherent in an ODA can raise and lead a regimental sized force and run a small city simultaneously... in my not so humble opinion. Communications and distribution (logistics) would be well within an ODA's capabilities.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 02 March 2011 at 10:07 AM
DanM,
Your comment from the ground is worth a lot. If I were leading a team into Benghazi, I'd be looking you up within hours. Stay safe there.
Posted by: The Twisted Genius | 02 March 2011 at 10:12 AM
Thanks TTG! I was in mutual support of 10th SFGA while stationed in S. FRG! Interesting people. Used to go down the LECH river to the Danube in the middle of the night in rafts near the Kaserne I was on. Germans on base were shocked at that rigorous approach to training.
Of course we (US) forces often call the "new NAZIs" by their draftees since we polished our boots.
Posted by: William R. Cumming | 02 March 2011 at 11:08 AM
Update on the children's crusade: Spent the day touring military camps. A couple are regular army/paratroopers. They wouldn't let us in but spoke to a few low level officers. At all of them they said they were getting ready to "soon" move to Adjibiya, the town before Brega. In one they had about 5 tanks, an equal number of tracked troop carriers (Russian, dunno there names). They said they were going to load them up onto trucks and take them down today.
But at the April 7 military academy (where i was told Capt. Qaddafi received his training) they let us right in. Thousands of young men in sandals and sneakers were lining up to leave their names and numbers. 3-4 groups of 50 were clustered around one ex-soldier with either a single Ak47 or FN rifle being shown how they worked. No weapons were being handed out -- i'm told the regular army doesn't want to let the shabaab have rifles because they worry about what comes next.
The "trainers" seemed reasonably squared away. But a very ragtag affair. One finished his demonstration with the FN and wanted to fire a round into the air. Misfires. Strips. Reloads. Misfires. Repeat. Fires. Pulls triger again, nothing.
Later in the day, I reckon up to 2,000 of the better armed irregulars headed the Adjibaya in pickups. Most had 50 cals or something like it in the bed, usually carrying twice as many people as rifles.
It appears that folks in in Brega drove out the qaddafi people. An hour ago i was told the Qaddafi folks were holed up at the university there. Just now i got a call from one of the irregulars down there who said they'd been allowed to withdraw towards Sirte.
Posted by: DanM | 02 March 2011 at 11:12 AM
I thought it was you, TTW. Thanks for the contribution to SST.
and thanks DanM, for whatever it's worth ;)
Posted by: LeaNder | 02 March 2011 at 12:35 PM
These suggested dynamic responses, to the situation in Libya seem to have some merit to me.
But in essence, they are the same type of imperial moves, that most of you started yelping about being "cowboy" like, when the Bushies did it.
In addition, over the years various bipartisan naive,liberal legislators, have made doing this sort of thing of dubious legality,if anybody actually cares about it(Jail anyone? Oh, I forgot, in today's America jail is only for us little people).
It's damn difficult, running a bastardized imperial grid, isn't it?
Posted by: Highlander | 02 March 2011 at 12:55 PM
Colonel,
Thanks to your Correspondents for the expert information.
An Operation similar to the one with the Northern Alliance in 2001 would work. However, Secretary Gates comments at West Point indicate that there are second thoughts. For good reason. There is still an infestation of creatures who make their living revolving through doors in DC who couldn’t carry 50 pounds five miles.
As soon as Muammar is overthrown, they will point out that the Libyan Provisional Government is filled with Muslims. Joint Base Wheeling will be activated, a third front opened, and more money will flow to think tanks and contractors.
Posted by: VietnamVet | 02 March 2011 at 01:02 PM
"...after a reasonablel period of hunger and deprivation in the capital."
So once a sufficient number of people in a city of 2,000,000 starve to death we'll insert 2-3,000 rebels? That doesn't seem very reasonable.
Posted by: Fred | 02 March 2011 at 01:13 PM
Smoke, et al.:
Are we sure that US Special Forces aren't already in Libya? If they were sent in, I would prefer that there was little fanfare; no public knowledge if at all possible. Perhaps the White House isn't playing up the situation for domestic advantage? What a novelty that would be.
Posted by: Medicine Man | 02 March 2011 at 01:55 PM
A map is necessary and a decent one is here:
http://www.elpais.com/graficos/internacional/revuelta/Libia/elpepuint/20110302elpepuint_1/Ges/
The regime is striking from controlled bases.
Although the immediate focus is Libya, what is the attitude and intention of Algeria. Surely the next 'domino' would be them, they
have no desire to go through a similar trauma, if the contagion can be contained in Libya.
C.f. http://counterpunch.org/prince03022011.html
The rapidity reminds me of Lebanon disintegrating in 1975, although the parallel is not comparable. Too bad commercial considerations have let Qadaffi survive. Will not miss him one bit.
U.S. has lost 2 Allies, (Egypt and Tunisia) and seems intent on at least on evening the score by taking out the unfriendly regime in Tripoli. How can you do that without endangering other allies (Oman, Bahrain, Morocco)? Interesting to watch how the US plays it, and how it plays out.
--------
-As always, immensely enjoy the blog and considered discussion on sic_semper_tyrannis
Posted by: SD | 02 March 2011 at 02:52 PM
SD
Thanks for the map link.
VV
Very true concern.
What about France, Italy and Spain? They (and the rest of the EU) sure don't want a few hundred thousand refugees in their countries should things collapse. Any chance of them doing this without the the US?
As to contractors etc where are the boys of Blackwater?
Posted by: Fred | 02 March 2011 at 04:20 PM
Juan Cole reporting NO CHANCE of US intervention.
Posted by: William R. Cumming | 02 March 2011 at 04:44 PM
"So once a sufficient number of people in a city of 2,000,000 starve to death we'll insert 2-3,000 rebels? That doesn't seem very reasonable."
My guess is that no one would ever starve to death or even get very hungry. When the people around MQ see that food is going to get short, it will simply be over for MQ. If MQ cannot keep a good bit of food on the table and a reasonable stock in the pantry, he cannot survive. No leader without the power to feed cannot keep the confidence of his pals. Food riots will start long before any real hunger sets in and once they begin, MQ's forces cannot resist them. The fear of impending hunger is a great motivator toward ending unsuccessful regimes. There are probably enough rebels in Tunis already to do the job. What is needed is sufficient fear on the part of the MQ forces to motivate their cowardice and desertion. A credible, present threat of a food shortage should be enough.
To have any hope of survival, MQ must keep supplies of all types coming in and if he cannot do that, then the people surrounding him will probably just fade into the environment and hope they are not held responsible for their killing and mayhem.
Posted by: WP | 02 March 2011 at 04:53 PM