You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Okay PL OS has your stamp of approval and seems reasonable based on what I know. Let's see how this plays out?
I keep getting rumors that many in the leadership positions in Egypt are busy night and day getting assets out of the country! Whether true or not voting with their feet or assets or both could be some indication that the situation remains extremely unstable.
This coming from the Director of the Central Incompetence Agency...
"CIA Director Leon Panetta, in testimony before a House intelligence committee Thursday, said, "There is a strong likelihood that Mubarak will step down this evening," referring to the Egyptian president."
The radio he/she duo come off as lightweight as almost all US media "entertainer" types appear to. In contrast, the BBC fellow had a serious presence and sophisticated approach to his profession.
It appears, so far, this crisis is beyond the ability of the US media to cover meaningfully. Superficialities and sound bites by blow dried talking head entertainers and dutiful self-censoring stenographers are fed to the US masses by the pro-Israel MSM.
If the issue is a democratic transition, then some serious consideration and analysis of the process in Egypt is in order.
Additionally, some serious analysis of what is transpiring at the White House and in Congress is in order.
This is a very complex situation with great implications for the United States. Yet it is being treated breathlessly and in semi-hysteria like some sports event.
It appears, may it please G-d, that the hour of liberation of the people of Egypt is near.
Men of discernment will stand and consider the events of the past few months, the seeming impossibility of it all. Let's pray that our own leaders open themselves to clear thinking and wisdom.
Much speculation as to what Mubarak will say shortly in the coming hours.
Friday prayer day is looming, so...?
If he steps down from the office of the President the issue will be under what modality. Will the forms of the present constitution be followed? Or, will the constitution be suspended and a direct military junta established? Or......?
"This is a very complex situation with great implications for the United States. Yet it is being treated breathlessly and in semi-hysteria like some sports event." Clifford
So true. Our corporate media has devolved to as you say "blow dried talking head entertainers". Unfortunately, the vast majority of the American people as a consequence do not have real information and analysis from experienced and knowledgeable folks. So we get nonsense spouted by Glenn Beck with the conspiracy of the Islamic Caliphate and the Communists and Nazis all collaborating on a New World Order of Sharia law or something like that. Just craziness - and this kind of stuff is being lapped up by large segments of our population.
I really despair for our country when we have successfully dumbed down large numbers of the people that they no longer have much ability to discern fact from fiction.
"This is a very complex situation with great implications for the United States. Yet it is being treated breathlessly and in semi-hysteria like some sports event."
Do we in the States know how to react any better these days? Everything is treated like a drama and circus by a very ill-informed media (take the two turkeys who interviewed PL), a bunch of policy wonks who rather debate egos than good policy and a intelligence community on the verge of revolt itself.
The press and demonstrators seem to think that Mubarak is about to step down. This may be the dawning of liberation. But it might also be the moment when martial law is declared. I hope the future honors the efforts and sacrifices of the demonstrators.
Single biggest impact of a Mubarak resignation IMO is UNCERTAINTY which is exactly what the WH cannot deal with. It is an ambiguous world but Obama and company wish to pretend they are in control. Let's just see.
FWIW: James Steinberg, the deputy secretary of state, said Washington was committed to ensuring that political changes in the Middle East did not threaten Israel and that any Egyptian government honours the treaty with the Jewish state.
israel more important than the citizens of Egypt !!!and then we are surprised by the anti-Americanism amongst the ordinary people of the ME.
"UNCERTAINTY" and the White House... That is right now even more scarier than the what is happening in Egypt. Hopefully the E-Ring has a real good handle on this.
An interesting analysis posted by Joshua Landis on his Syria Comment blog:
"This is a note from Chas Freeman.
It seems to me that one way to interpret what is happening in the Middle East is that it marks the belated passing of the residual elements of a colonial order that had never really been transcended despite the hard knock it received thirty years ago from the Islamic revolution in Iran.
This order derived its legitimacy from a peculiar mixture of imperial dispensations of territory (the Balfour Declaration was, after all, colonialist in origin, tone, and inspiration) and linkages between local elites and their former colonial masters (the favored position of Lebanese Christians being only one of many examples) or foreign kin (Israel). Cold War maneuvering between the contending superpowers fostered neo-colonial relationships of dependency on one or the other of them by countries like Israel (whose prosperity and hegemony have depended on U.S. and Diaspora subventions and subsidies), Egypt (which switched sides to call off the fight with Israel and go on a better payroll), Syria (which failed to maneuver successfully and was orphaned when the USSR imploded), and Iraq (which mistakenly gambled on its judgment that the end of superpower rivalry meant an end to U.S. interest in the region). The degree of dependence on foreign backing by both Israeli and Arab elites (as well as Iranian elites before 1979) vastly exceeds that in any other region of the world. It’s been a good deal for them, if not for those over whom they rule, but I sense it is now coming to an end.
What may also be ending is the fatalistic passivity and groveling to power that have made the Arab world stand out among the world’s great civilizations as the only one not to have seen a rebirth of intellect, wealth, and power. (Iran’s attempt at achieving this has so far largely failed but at least Iran made the effort.) The contrast with renewed Chinese, Indian, and Turkish vigor and self-confidence (not to mention the Japanese in an earlier era) has been striking. It is too early to say whether the energy of the Tunisian and Egyptian streets heralds a turn toward Arabs similarly taking charge of their own destiny, but I think it is a possibility worth watching — whatever the immediate outcome in terms of quality of governance.
Leon Hadar has made the useful point that, if the relevant analogy to Egypt and its Revolution is Poland and Solidarity, then the United States stands in the position of the Soviet Union and Obama in the role of Gorbachev. That is not encouraging in terms of either choices or outcomes. Whatever happens, the ebb of U.S. power in the Middle East is now at riptide."
* [Chas Freedman worked as the interpreter for Richard Nixon in his 1972 China visit and as the United States Ambassador to Saudi Arabia from 1989 to 1992, where he dealt with issues related to the Persian Gulf War. He is a past president of the Middle East Policy Council, co-chair of the U.S. China Policy Foundation, and vice-chair of the Atlantic Council.]
You have removed from this site a thread you started , because I obliquely challenged you about USA involvement in the use of torture to extract "Actionable Intelligence " known to the rest of us as Torture in Egypt.
Jake, i don't think we, the US can do anything. It is not our country. Neither side in the revolution seem to want or care about our opinions.
Mabarak's speech just shows what a tyrant he is and how little he does care for his people.
I'm afraid that there will be a tragedy, but unlike Tinneman Square, I hope and pray that the Egyptian people will prevail in the long run.
Okay PL OS has your stamp of approval and seems reasonable based on what I know. Let's see how this plays out?
I keep getting rumors that many in the leadership positions in Egypt are busy night and day getting assets out of the country! Whether true or not voting with their feet or assets or both could be some indication that the situation remains extremely unstable.
Posted by: William R. Cumming | 10 February 2011 at 10:37 AM
This coming from the Director of the Central Incompetence Agency...
"CIA Director Leon Panetta, in testimony before a House intelligence committee Thursday, said, "There is a strong likelihood that Mubarak will step down this evening," referring to the Egyptian president."
http://link.email.washingtonpost.com/r/6041ZA/S3LED3/LNLY69/NV63P2/5SQB4/MQ/h
Hopefully this squawk did not come from the South American Desk as part of the CIA 2015 Reorganization....
Posted by: Jake | 10 February 2011 at 11:17 AM
Excellent comments.
The radio he/she duo come off as lightweight as almost all US media "entertainer" types appear to. In contrast, the BBC fellow had a serious presence and sophisticated approach to his profession.
It appears, so far, this crisis is beyond the ability of the US media to cover meaningfully. Superficialities and sound bites by blow dried talking head entertainers and dutiful self-censoring stenographers are fed to the US masses by the pro-Israel MSM.
If the issue is a democratic transition, then some serious consideration and analysis of the process in Egypt is in order.
Additionally, some serious analysis of what is transpiring at the White House and in Congress is in order.
This is a very complex situation with great implications for the United States. Yet it is being treated breathlessly and in semi-hysteria like some sports event.
Posted by: Clifford Kiracofe | 10 February 2011 at 11:29 AM
It appears, may it please G-d, that the hour of liberation of the people of Egypt is near.
Men of discernment will stand and consider the events of the past few months, the seeming impossibility of it all. Let's pray that our own leaders open themselves to clear thinking and wisdom.
To the gallant people of Egypt.
Posted by: jr786 | 10 February 2011 at 11:30 AM
Much speculation as to what Mubarak will say shortly in the coming hours.
Friday prayer day is looming, so...?
If he steps down from the office of the President the issue will be under what modality. Will the forms of the present constitution be followed? Or, will the constitution be suspended and a direct military junta established? Or......?
Posted by: Clifford Kiracofe | 10 February 2011 at 11:41 AM
interesting news:
possibly Mubarak will resign tonight: see Al jezera breaking news
Posted by: Norbert M. Salamon | 10 February 2011 at 11:50 AM
"This is a very complex situation with great implications for the United States. Yet it is being treated breathlessly and in semi-hysteria like some sports event." Clifford
So true. Our corporate media has devolved to as you say "blow dried talking head entertainers". Unfortunately, the vast majority of the American people as a consequence do not have real information and analysis from experienced and knowledgeable folks. So we get nonsense spouted by Glenn Beck with the conspiracy of the Islamic Caliphate and the Communists and Nazis all collaborating on a New World Order of Sharia law or something like that. Just craziness - and this kind of stuff is being lapped up by large segments of our population.
I really despair for our country when we have successfully dumbed down large numbers of the people that they no longer have much ability to discern fact from fiction.
Posted by: zanzibar | 10 February 2011 at 12:02 PM
Cliff,
"This is a very complex situation with great implications for the United States. Yet it is being treated breathlessly and in semi-hysteria like some sports event."
Do we in the States know how to react any better these days? Everything is treated like a drama and circus by a very ill-informed media (take the two turkeys who interviewed PL), a bunch of policy wonks who rather debate egos than good policy and a intelligence community on the verge of revolt itself.
I fear for the future of the republic...
Posted by: Jake | 10 February 2011 at 12:09 PM
jr786,
We better pray that God has something to do with this. Otherwise we are in for a world of hurt.
Lets not count the chickens until the eggs hatch or we shoot the fox before there are no chickens.
Posted by: Jake | 10 February 2011 at 12:13 PM
The press and demonstrators seem to think that Mubarak is about to step down. This may be the dawning of liberation. But it might also be the moment when martial law is declared. I hope the future honors the efforts and sacrifices of the demonstrators.
Posted by: jon | 10 February 2011 at 12:17 PM
Single biggest impact of a Mubarak resignation IMO is UNCERTAINTY which is exactly what the WH cannot deal with. It is an ambiguous world but Obama and company wish to pretend they are in control. Let's just see.
Posted by: William R. Cumming | 10 February 2011 at 12:35 PM
Will the handover of power be to the Military or Sulayman?
we will know in a few minutes.
Posted by: The beaver | 10 February 2011 at 12:40 PM
FWIW: James Steinberg, the deputy secretary of state, said Washington was committed to ensuring that political changes in the Middle East did not threaten Israel and that any Egyptian government honours the treaty with the Jewish state.
israel more important than the citizens of Egypt !!!and then we are surprised by the anti-Americanism amongst the ordinary people of the ME.
Posted by: The beaver | 10 February 2011 at 12:44 PM
"UNCERTAINTY" and the White House... That is right now even more scarier than the what is happening in Egypt. Hopefully the E-Ring has a real good handle on this.
Posted by: Jake | 10 February 2011 at 02:56 PM
Methinks the Obama machine is in overdrive to make Egypt the @Star@ for 2012.
Maybe US Troops play some war games in Sinai, etc
Posted by: Cloned_Poster | 10 February 2011 at 03:55 PM
An interesting analysis posted by Joshua Landis on his Syria Comment blog:
"This is a note from Chas Freeman.
It seems to me that one way to interpret what is happening in the Middle East is that it marks the belated passing of the residual elements of a colonial order that had never really been transcended despite the hard knock it received thirty years ago from the Islamic revolution in Iran.
This order derived its legitimacy from a peculiar mixture of imperial dispensations of territory (the Balfour Declaration was, after all, colonialist in origin, tone, and inspiration) and linkages between local elites and their former colonial masters (the favored position of Lebanese Christians being only one of many examples) or foreign kin (Israel). Cold War maneuvering between the contending superpowers fostered neo-colonial relationships of dependency on one or the other of them by countries like Israel (whose prosperity and hegemony have depended on U.S. and Diaspora subventions and subsidies), Egypt (which switched sides to call off the fight with Israel and go on a better payroll), Syria (which failed to maneuver successfully and was orphaned when the USSR imploded), and Iraq (which mistakenly gambled on its judgment that the end of superpower rivalry meant an end to U.S. interest in the region). The degree of dependence on foreign backing by both Israeli and Arab elites (as well as Iranian elites before 1979) vastly exceeds that in any other region of the world. It’s been a good deal for them, if not for those over whom they rule, but I sense it is now coming to an end.
What may also be ending is the fatalistic passivity and groveling to power that have made the Arab world stand out among the world’s great civilizations as the only one not to have seen a rebirth of intellect, wealth, and power. (Iran’s attempt at achieving this has so far largely failed but at least Iran made the effort.) The contrast with renewed Chinese, Indian, and Turkish vigor and self-confidence (not to mention the Japanese in an earlier era) has been striking. It is too early to say whether the energy of the Tunisian and Egyptian streets heralds a turn toward Arabs similarly taking charge of their own destiny, but I think it is a possibility worth watching — whatever the immediate outcome in terms of quality of governance.
Leon Hadar has made the useful point that, if the relevant analogy to Egypt and its Revolution is Poland and Solidarity, then the United States stands in the position of the Soviet Union and Obama in the role of Gorbachev. That is not encouraging in terms of either choices or outcomes. Whatever happens, the ebb of U.S. power in the Middle East is now at riptide."
* [Chas Freedman worked as the interpreter for Richard Nixon in his 1972 China visit and as the United States Ambassador to Saudi Arabia from 1989 to 1992, where he dealt with issues related to the Persian Gulf War. He is a past president of the Middle East Policy Council, co-chair of the U.S. China Policy Foundation, and vice-chair of the Atlantic Council.]
Posted by: Thomas | 10 February 2011 at 04:08 PM
DaveGood
Like, what? pl
Posted by: Patrick Lang | 10 February 2011 at 04:24 PM
Apparently, Mubarak will not resign as per his speech.
I think this puts him in a very precarious position. Events have overtaken him and he doesn't seem to realize that.
Posted by: steve | 10 February 2011 at 04:24 PM
Mubarak not resigning, will stay to September.
Patronising speech and minor amendments to the Constitution.
Powers(?) to be transferred to VP Sulieman.
Noises about Sovereignty, not bowing to foreign pressure, etc. etc.
This is not good. Tweets suggesting march on Presidential Palace.
Posted by: walrus | 10 February 2011 at 04:36 PM
walrus et al
Mubarak's speech and Suleiman's clarification indicate that the military regime is digging itself in and will not yield much.
I would say that the stage is set for a tragedy of unpredictable size and nature. pl
Posted by: Patrick Lang | 10 February 2011 at 04:42 PM
"I would say that the stage is set for a tragedy of unpredictable size and nature."
Indeed, we (the US) now can either stabilize the situation or push it out of control.
Posted by: Jake | 10 February 2011 at 04:45 PM
Colonel,
You have removed from this site a thread you started , because I obliquely challenged you about USA involvement in the use of torture to extract "Actionable Intelligence " known to the rest of us as Torture in Egypt.
What do y0u know about this?
Posted by: DaveGood | 10 February 2011 at 05:02 PM
Jake, i don't think we, the US can do anything. It is not our country. Neither side in the revolution seem to want or care about our opinions.
Mabarak's speech just shows what a tyrant he is and how little he does care for his people.
I'm afraid that there will be a tragedy, but unlike Tinneman Square, I hope and pray that the Egyptian people will prevail in the long run.
Posted by: Nancy K | 10 February 2011 at 05:19 PM
Any chance of the army generals throwing both Mubarak and Suleiman out and ruling themselves? Mubarak seems clueless of the anger of the street.
Posted by: Mark | 10 February 2011 at 05:20 PM
DaveGood
I didn't delete anything like that and I did not write such a post. pl
Posted by: Patrick Lang | 10 February 2011 at 05:23 PM