"“We have learned something important since the days that I served in Vietnam,” Mr. Blumenthal said to the group gathered in Norwalk in March 2008. “And you exemplify it. Whatever we think about the war, whatever we call it — Afghanistan or Iraq — we owe our military men and women unconditional support.”
There was one problem: Mr. Blumenthal, a Democrat now running for the United States Senate, never served in Vietnam. He obtained at least five military deferments from 1965 to 1970 and took repeated steps that enabled him to avoid going to war, according to records.
The deferments allowed Mr. Blumenthal to complete his studies at Harvard; pursue a graduate fellowship in England; serve as a special assistant to The Washington Post’s publisher, Katharine Graham; and ultimately take a job in the Nixon White House.
In 1970, with his last deferment in jeopardy, he landed a coveted spot in the Marine Reserve, which virtually guaranteed that he would not be sent to Vietnam. He joined a unit in Washington that conducted drills and other exercises and focused on local projects, like fixing a campground and organizing a Toys for Tots drive." NY Times
------------------------------------------------------------------
Who would have know that us folks who were thought of by many as moral derelicts for serving would become iconic images? Politicians lie in order to be thought of as Vietnam veterans. Any number of them have done this. Blumenthal is merely the most recent. There is an interesting book on this subject. It is titled "Stolen Valor."
I would think that Blumenthal's political life is ended. pl
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/18/nyregion/18blumenthal.html?hp
"Politicians lie..." It's the nature of the beast.
Thank you Founding Fathers for the first amendment and freedom of the press.
Posted by: Ken | 18 May 2010 at 10:44 AM
Col: Let us hope so.
Posted by: Matthew | 18 May 2010 at 10:45 AM
Col.
It is not only the Vietnam war- my dad who volunteered for WWII witnessed quite a few of those "Pseudo-WWII the big One" vets also in the 60's ( when we didn't have Internet). After a few times of listening to their lies, he used to challenge them to come out clean......
Posted by: The beaver | 18 May 2010 at 11:09 AM
The man is clearly a Walter Mitty of epic proportions, and isn't fit to lick the boots of those who've served and died in that faraway place.
Posted by: Lord Curzon | 18 May 2010 at 01:08 PM
The British call them "Walts" - Walter Mittys.
We get a few of them every year around Anzac Day.
Posted by: walrus | 18 May 2010 at 01:44 PM
It's a lie that doesn't make much sense according to Nate Silver at 538.com.
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/05/in-connecticut-dems-may-need-to-draft.html
Posted by: greg0 | 18 May 2010 at 01:54 PM
I already know that many of our politicians are chickenhawks:
http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html
But what I'd like to know is how many of our multi-starred generals running the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are chickenhawks as well. Something tells me, though I don't know for sure, that very few of them have ever put their lives directly on the line in real-life combat -- minus any of that play stuff they do on weekends from time to time.
This leads me to say that I think as long as the US is thought of as having the most powerful military on the planet, we'll continue to keep our generals in power, even if none of them can win a war against an enemy whose firepower is far beneath ours. If we don't, we'll be sending a message to the world that having a military that dwarfs all others by a long shot is not what it's cracked up to be, forcing us to give up many our military (mis)adventures around the globe. Something similar can be said about our banking system. As long as the US is thought of as the world's leader in finance, we'll keep our bankers rolling in the dough, if even the vast majority of them are lousy at investing. If we don't, we'll be sending a message to the world that our banking system is no longer up to snuff, forcing us to hand some of our financial power over to one or several of the BRIC countries.
Posted by: Cynthia | 18 May 2010 at 01:59 PM
Stolen Valor is a great book.
As to the why, well, I run into people who do this all the time. They usually have a drink in their hand or close by. They usually talk tough and obviously are not fit enough to walk up a hill. They usually have large gun collections. And for some reason, it's always Vietnam that they claim to have served in, despite quite a few of these folks being far too young to have served there. Most of those could more convincingly claim the Gulf War, but they don't. I have some theories as to why.
The most important common denominator is that they are, regardless of what they have or have not achieved in life, horribly, profoundly insecure.
Blumenthal is done. I'm sorry about the resources that my party put into trying to run him; maybe they'll do some basic background investigation of candidate claims next time.
Posted by: The Moar You Know | 18 May 2010 at 02:30 PM
He was also inconsistent, in a speech he gave earlier this year, he clearly stated he had never served in Vietnam, yet he has also stated that he had. The only thing worse that a liar is a bad liar.
Posted by: Nancy K | 18 May 2010 at 02:33 PM
Five deferments just like Dick Cheney and Saxby Chambliss. Served in Nixon administration.Switched to Democrat to run in Connecticut.When I don't know,but apparently he's just another professional politician that will do anything to get elected.
Posted by: par4 | 18 May 2010 at 02:56 PM
Let us hope his political career is dead. This isn't the only thing;there was an article about him that touted his being captain on the Harvard swim team. Except Harvard has no record of his having been on the swim team. Not what the country or his state needs.
Posted by: Jan P | 18 May 2010 at 04:12 PM
I hate doing a walkback, but I've got to. This is apparently the only time he has stated that he served in Vietnam. He has previously stated, often, that he served DURING Vietnam, not that he was there.
Facts are important, and I jumped on the bandwagon sooner than I should have, without due diligence.
Posted by: The Moar You Know | 18 May 2010 at 04:14 PM
This phenomenon is apparently universal and at least as old as Homer. I had a Cuban high school Spanish teacher decades ago who claimed to be a veteran of the Bay of Pigs. Recently, with my curiosity prompted by a recent book about Fidel Castro's health, I checked several online rosters of the membership of Battalion 2506. My teacher wasn't on any of them. This did me no real harm, but I really don't appreciate the guy lying like that to me and bunch of other, naive 16-year old kids.
Posted by: Cato the Censor | 18 May 2010 at 04:42 PM
I lived in Conn. for 26 years.
Do NOT under-estimate the far left politics prevalent there.
In America, Blumenthal is a never-was.
In Conn., maybe not.
Who knows...he might get an honorary degree from Yale.
Posted by: graywolf | 18 May 2010 at 05:50 PM
It must be some kind of emotional or psychological problem. Someone as smart as Blumenthal would have to know that a mere resume-padding lie would be discovered. But a Walter Mittystyle fantasy reconstruction of a life one wishes one would have lived can dissolve the mental barrier between did and woulda.
And as The Moar You Know points out, he usually described himself as having served "during" the Vietnam War. Perhaps overtiredness broke down his normal caution-based separation of the remembered and the wished-for.
Posted by: different clue | 18 May 2010 at 06:12 PM
I served(Army) and proud of it.My age(67) could lead to some thinking I am a Vietnam Vet.I was discharged Oct.64 and have ALWAYS and AUTOMATICALY said that I wasn't there and NEVER even hinted that I might have been.Those who lie are always caught out,sometimes within a few minutes.Some would say to feel sorry for them,but I cannot........A Navy Vietnam Vet I know laughs about making Ice Cream for 6 months aboard ship.
Posted by: RA15665805 | 18 May 2010 at 06:59 PM
I really liked what Matt Yglesias had to say about this today:
US Senate elections are not nearly as complicated as voters generally seem to think. If you live in Connecticut and you generally like Barack Obama’s legislative agenda that Blumenthal—or almost any other Democrat for that matter—can be counted on to reliably support said agenda, with some exceptions for idiosyncratic Connecticut-related concerns. Conversely, even a relatively moderate Republican like Rob Simmons will mostly act to obstruct said agenda and will generally vote in favor of the agenda of the next Republican president. Which is just to say that partisanship predicts a lot about legislative behavior and past military service or past baffling and opportunistic deception predicts very little. But of course the famed swing voter doesn’t see things that way.
Posted by: matt | 18 May 2010 at 09:24 PM
This could a blessing in disguise if it knocks him out of the senate race. Richard B. appears to be a churner of lawsuits.
Posted by: WILL | 18 May 2010 at 09:29 PM
There are something like 9 "personality disorders" in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).
According to my wife the psychoanalyst, all of us exhibit (to varying degrees of course) one or more of the "symptoms" of one or more of the 9 disorders.
A person is "personality disordered" when they exhibit enough "symptoms", and severely enough, that their behavior becomes dysfunctional.
Long way of saying that Blumenthal needs therapy. And he doesn't need to be a leader.
Posted by: JM | 18 May 2010 at 10:46 PM
What's especially galling is this clown's Cheney-like string of five deferments before landing a sinecure in the USMC Reserve, where the most warlike thing he ever did was take part in their "Toys-for-Tots" mission.
And he has the nerve to call himself a Vietnam Vet? What a jerk!
Posted by: Redhand | 19 May 2010 at 02:02 AM
I am with RA above. I served in the Army after Korea and before Vietnam.
I did my overseas service in Louisiana.
I meet a number of the "truthiness" tellers at the target range each month. Invariably they own an AR15, SKS, AK47 or AK74.
Posted by: R Whitman | 19 May 2010 at 07:55 AM
Blumenthal needs to be dropped in sheep-dip!
Posted by: J | 19 May 2010 at 08:44 AM
I'm confused about the reserves back during Viet Nam. I was in the Marines for three years in the late 1950s peacetime. Afterwards I had a reserve obligation of some kind and remember being uneasy in the mid-60s even though I was by then into my 30s. Wasn't Viet Nam sucking up many reservists?
Posted by: Bart | 19 May 2010 at 09:09 AM
Hey, JM, I wonder what your wife says about Sarah Palin and narcissistic personality disorder?
Posted by: Norm Mosher | 19 May 2010 at 09:49 AM
This incident revealed to me that there really are things you can get away with in the eyes of certain bloggers on the Left, specifically the ones who rushed to defend Blumenthal by using the argument that "other politicians have done the same thing."
That's not a valid defense. It's an intellectually dishonest excuse for a career-ending bit of resume enhancement. There will be Republicans and Democrats who will probably try this in the future. How they are treated will be determined by what party they're in. And that's a crap sandwich, served open faced.
Posted by: Norman Rogers | 19 May 2010 at 10:13 AM