"My recent account of the career of Dr. Lani Kass was based on what has appeared about her in the public record and media, including her own comments regarding national defense and security policy. To recapitulate, Kass was born, raised, and educated in Israel. She has a PhD in Russian studies and is fluent in Russian and Hebrew in addition to English. Kass reportedly reached the rank of major in the Israeli air force before moving to the United States and working her way up through the US defense establishment. She is currently the most senior civilian adviser to Air Force Chief of Staff Norton Schwartz and is believed to have access to most American defense secrets. Kass is best known to the public for her role in promoting Air Force cyberwarfare, but she also appears to have been a major player in counter-terrorism policy and in war preparations directed against Iran even though she has no actual substantive background in those areas. She believes that the US is engaged in a long war against Islamo-radicalism and that "winning" against Iran is necessary but the American people must be willing to pay the price to succeed."
------------------------------------------------------
In this piece Giraldi raises the question of how this person could have been given a clearance for access to US defense secrets. Normally, the security clearance adjudicators, a humorless lot, would turn thumbs down on someone like her, not because she is an immigrant, but because she is, at the very least, a former foreign intelligence officer. I know of no other case like this. The only way she could have been cleared is that some as yet undisclosed person or persons with a great deal of power in DoD simply over-ruled the adjudicators. This must have happened repeatedly as her level of access to secrets has steadily risen.
Ironically, the situation would be quite different if she were here on assignment as an Israeli intelligence officer at the embassy or some such thing. In that case she would have some access granted by the US but it would be carefully limited. pl
http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2010/04/21/israel-first-more-on-dr-lani-kass/
So far as I can tell, Giraldi's thrusts have been ignored outside the defense-security technocratic
establishement and the blogosphere. Such will almost certainly continue to be the case until such time (probably when hell freezes over) as some politician deigns to mention the problem. Should such a miracle take place, I would bet all my chips on the success of the AIPAC-Israel lobby counterattack against the military-security faction. Accusations of antisemitism and neo-McCarthyism will quickly place Giraldi's view "beyond the pale". This is not the way I would like things to be, but rather the way, in my opinion, that they stand. One might ask the survivors of the U.S.S. Liberty about such matters.
Posted by: Hannah K. O'Luthon | 22 April 2010 at 10:35 AM
Phil, Colonel,
Correct me if my memory is wrong. 'Another' Israel firster 'FORMER FOREIGN INTEL officer' that had all the barricades lowered for his access to a U.S. Security Clearance and access to U.S. Classified -- Former U.S. Ambassador Martin Indyk. Indyk also during his U.S. Ambassador tenure had his access to U.S. Classified 'pulled' because he had met with an Israeli 'Intel persona'. Indyk is a 'FORMER AUSTRALIAN INTEL asset'.
IMO, FORMER FOREIGN INTEL assets and they have the safety barricades 'specially lowered' for them, has set a very dangerous precedent for our U.S. National Security.
What next? Will we one day see the NSC filled with FORMER FOREIGN INTEL assets? I cringe at the thought of a former SVR in our NSC thanks to the precedent set by the Israel firster FORMER FOREIGN INTEL assets like Kass and Indyk. Cringe, cringe, shudder, shudder.
Posted by: J | 22 April 2010 at 11:13 AM
What does it say about the judgement of Admiral Mullen that he should employ as principal Middle East advisor someone like Lani Kass?
Posted by: David Habakkuk | 22 April 2010 at 11:24 AM
HKO
Yes. That is how people like her get security clearances. pl
Posted by: Patrick Lang | 22 April 2010 at 11:27 AM
J- Martin Indyk did indeed have his clearance lifted when he misused classified information while Ambassador to Israel. Earlier, he had received a fasttrack nationalization as an American citizen so Clinton could appoint him ambassador. He worked for AIPAC and was the director of WINEP. The only good thing I can say about him is that he is a relative moderate on the Middle East in spite of his background. Moderate means he hasn't called for sending all Palestinians to a gulag. Didn't know he had an intel connection...
Posted by: Phil Giraldi | 22 April 2010 at 11:41 AM
Phil, Colonel,
One other thing, whenever 'Israeli INTEL' is mentioned, two words immediately come to mind -- Swiss Cheese.
Posted by: J | 22 April 2010 at 11:44 AM
So I am NOT surprised that Michael Oren, American-born Israeli is at the Embassy in DC. I can only paraphrase: "They are going for the jugular" with their hands everywhere from Silicon Valley to the inner sanctum of the govt :-(
Posted by: The beaver | 22 April 2010 at 11:53 AM
From your linked article: "The Industrial War College was, as the name implies, an institute set up to coordinate industrial production with Defense Department needs".
That would explain why US manufacturing is outsourced to China; and lets not forget the indictments against Mr. Norzette:
http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2010/03/more-nozette-documents.html
"Dr. Lani Kass is now the principal adviser to Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen regarding the Middle East. She recently was involved in a very important meeting, one that concerned Israel.
The meeting took place because of concerns that the United States has been losing the "war of ideas" in the Muslim world. "
And Isreal has been 'winning' the war of ideas with the Muslim world? God help us.
Posted by: Fred | 22 April 2010 at 12:16 PM
COL Lang, Mr. Giraldi: if I recall correctly, Dr. Steven Hatfill, the first major suspect in the post 9-11 anthrax letters case, is originally from South Africa and worked for the apartheid era South African government in Intelligence or Security. There is, also, apparently some question as to whether one of his doctoral level degrees, I can't recall if its the medical or the PhD, is suspect. None of these security questions excuses the horrid treatment he received at the hands of the DOJ and FBI or the media.
Posted by: Adam L Silverman | 22 April 2010 at 12:18 PM
The comments on this blog are most thoughtful. I too am discouraged that the msm doesn't seem to care that an official with access to America's most highly classified information very likely has an ongoing relationship with a foreign intelligence service. Perhaps we all ought to do our best to get this story out.
Posted by: JoaoAlfaiate | 22 April 2010 at 12:20 PM
Colonel,
Our MSM and Politicians too often forget or 'choose to forget' is that whenever U.S. Classified is COMPROMISED to Foreign Intel whether it be Friend or Foe, puts U.S. citizens in jeopardy, be they U.S. Civilian or Military. When you have friends like Israel and its Intel apparatuses that willingly stab our U.S, National Security in our backs (over and over), THEY (Israeli Intel Apparatuses) then become an ENEMY of our U.S. Citizenry.
The only other nation that comes to mind that our politicians would have let get away with the crap that Israel has, is the U.K.. However with the U.K., we BOTH have exchanged crap back-n-forth at times in both of our histories. However the U.K. have put British lives on the line for our U.S., and we have done the same for them. Israel has never done such for our U.S., it's always been U.S. lives jeopardized on behalf of Israel.
Posted by: J | 22 April 2010 at 01:04 PM
Adam S.
If wiki can be trusted Hatfill is american born and raised. The African business sounds quite bogus and is probably a creation of his imagination. Nevertheless, the extent of his lies made him a probable target in the investigation. pl
Posted by: Patrick Lang | 22 April 2010 at 01:17 PM
Information has again been posted on Smallwarsjournal.
The general tenor of the few comments to my original submissions were:
1. "How dare you!" Followed by denigration of the sources and the usual Anti - semitic jibe.
2. "I know her and she is wonderful."
3. "So what? Everyone in the Pentagon has a political axe to grind."
As a dual national myself, I could not possibly see myself in such a role because the personal conflicts of interest at that policy level are in my opinion, simply massive and no amount of mental gymnastics is going to reconcile them.
On a technical level, I'm starting to get the impression that American policy towards its allies is being influenced by the realisation that anything that is shared with Australia or Britain will be automatically demanded by Israel. A pertinent case in point is the source code (computer programs) within the F35 joint strike fighter which has been denied to all purchasers, of which Israel is one and Australia another. I can only think of one reason for this, and that is fear of the information being "re - exported" in Israeli products.
Posted by: walrus | 22 April 2010 at 02:01 PM
Colonel
Hatfill did go to Zimbabwe but as far as studying in S.A, he made that up on his résumé- confirmed by his lawyer as per
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/28/washington/28hatfill.html
Posted by: The beaver | 22 April 2010 at 02:04 PM
@JoaoAlfaiate; Don't waste your time waiting for the MSM to report anything truly newsworthy. They have lost all credibility over the last few decades. The days of 'Uncle Walter' are long gone.
Posted by: par4 | 22 April 2010 at 03:34 PM
Col: Can either you or Phil help me with these tea leaves.....
I had a chance to talk to Michael O'Hanlon at a function last night. He catagorically stated that we have no decent military option in Iran and even he (an Iraq War booster) stated that he opposes military action.
Does this represent the chattering in DC or does this mean that politically war with Iran is non-viable, so we should expect some false flag action to force our reluctant country into it?
Posted by: Matthew | 22 April 2010 at 05:27 PM
Matthew
Short of a truly massive commitment of strategic assets, there is no viable military course of action against Iran. The Israeli thing is a joke.
That is what Gates is talking about in calling for a long term plan for dealing with Iran. pl
Posted by: Patrick Lang | 22 April 2010 at 05:46 PM
The article has got a "hasbara" type steaming over at Mondoweiss
http://mondoweiss.net/2010/04/giraldi-says-senior-air-force-adviser-may-have-dual-loyalty-to-israel.html
Posted by: The beaver | 22 April 2010 at 08:30 PM
Beaver,
Regarding the obvious Hasbara eee over at Modoweiss and his/her Israeli venom about the Dreyfus affair, I'd love to see eee's IP location. Hmmmm...Herzliya perhaps?
Posted by: J | 22 April 2010 at 09:13 PM
Beaver and J,
Do you think "eee" was getting double or triple time for his/her valiant Hasbara ops at mondoweiss?
Posted by: Jackie | 23 April 2010 at 01:20 AM
The real question is who adjudicated the background info collected for Dr. Kass from the time she was cleared for some level of classified material and separately who has determined her "need to know" for various sensitive issues involving Israel and DOD policy and conops? And what exactly are the restrictions on Israli transmittal to Russian INTEL of US classified information? If the Israelies are receiving NOFORN is that in fact being retransmitted to Russia on a regular basis? China? Iran? The latter is mentioned because of documented Israeli efforts to support Iran during the Iran Iraqi War in the 80s!
Posted by: William R. Cumming | 23 April 2010 at 01:51 AM
Right at the end of this article from Haaretz their an interesting little quote:
Netanyahu amenable to Palestinian state within temporary borders - Haaretz - Israel News:
(Emphasis in above quote added by me)
markfromireland
Posted by: markfromireland | 23 April 2010 at 05:34 AM
What is more interesting is the virtual smallwarsjournal IP.
Posted by: walrus | 23 April 2010 at 07:33 AM
The comment by Walrus cuts straight to the heart of this problem: "As a dual national myself, I could not possibly see myself in such a role because the personal conflicts of interest at that policy level are in my opinion, simply massive and no amount of mental gymnastics is going to reconcile them."
There is no way a person like Kass can be expected to advocate anything contrary to her dual loyalties. Even in the absence of wrongful disclosure of classified information, the built-in conflict this person has is absolutely viral. She has no business whatsoever being in this position.
Even more amazing is that the brass apparently doesn't have a problem with this.
Posted by: Redhand | 23 April 2010 at 08:14 AM
Colonel,
All of the passions and hatreds humans bear will continue into the 21st century. Atomic Weapons will be obtained by states wealthy enough to afford them. The real question is what will happen to States in the era of Globalization.
First, as more jobs go overseas, the ranks of the underemployed will continue to swell. Any nation is subject to revolt when the unemployed single males reach 30-40%; especially in a once rich nation bilked out of its wealth by financial shenanigans.
Second, is the rise of the Multi-Nationalist: People more at home at Davos, Switzarland than Flint, Michigan, Tom Friedman acolytes. If I would hazard a wild guess, Dr. Lani Kass loyalties lie with her family and like minded persons who work for multi-national companies in particular in Israel. Since she climbed up so far at DOD, a hubris that she is one of the selected few, right is might, and finally a skill at expressing what the boss wants to hear. A Person who sets the Revolving Door spinning.
Posted by: VietnamVet | 23 April 2010 at 11:47 AM