« Defeat for Political "Change" in Iraq. | Main | National Journal blog - 21 January 2010 »

20 January 2010


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


I would be interested to know why Silverman thinks that the US is not totally in synch with Maliki's rolling up as much power as possible. This would put Maliki in the same position as most of the tyrants in the region, who are extremely cozy with the United States.

Also, why does Silverman think that American advisers are merely advising? If the past is any indication of American involvement, I'd bet that American "advisers" exercise considerable authority including veto power. I'd also bet that American "advisers" are pervasive, positioned at every level of government and at all key ministries.

Patrick Lang


I don't know if Dr. Silverman will answer you.

What could he possible say that could overcome the obstacle of your animosity? pl

Patrick Lang

Jhofer writes

Animosity? Asking about a possible alternative explanations for undemocratic tendencies in Iraq is animosity? Actually I would be delighted if the US presence in Iraq were conducive to democracy. But as we all know, freedom, democracy, and human rights were merely convenient, noble concepts, talking points used to promote and rationalize the Occupation. As soon as the reality of the situation on the ground proved their mendacity, they were quietly replaced with other pretexts for what the US is doing.


There isn't much external power can do to change Iraq current political direction except maybe creating genocide/civil war condition.

Iraq just come out of pretty ugly inter ethnic clash (with concrete barrier and all). No big player trust anybody in there. Of course maliki first instinct is to consolidate power unless he wants his behind blown sky high.

Blood letting that big can only subside after two or three leadership cycles. Only then people will start dealing with each other in earnest politically.

Iraq natural ally is Syria. And Iran to the eastern shia. It'll be pretty delusional to wish Iraq to align with US geopolitically after what happens in the past 20 years. Not a chance. The minute US left. It's all Russian and chinese. Then the Iraqis are going to start exact revange against who they consider traitors. (kurd, kuwaitis, Saudi) Syria and Iran would be right on their side.

And that's the good scenario, where Iraq as a nation hold up instead of blowing up inside out.

If Maliki doesn't hold up, then it's factional civil war (everybody has guns and has reason to shoot the other guys) And with al qaeda active in Iraq (last series of bombing designed to create inter factional anger and to show government impotency) Iraq imploding in civil war is a possibility.

whatever it is. I for one would want Iraq to stabilize in whatever form. Even if Maliki turn into Saddam lite.

Observe Riot in Nigeria, Kenya and recent flooding in Egypt. Even the church bombing in Malaysia. Large Islamic countries will soon start turning unstable one after another. Combination of economic malaise, weak government, unresolved tension, and al qaeda preachers + terrorism.

Iraq is a major arab country with big population. It needs a functioning government pronto before nationalism fades. (at least they got oil and can ask somebody to supply weapons and international support)


Long term policy outlook? prevent Iraq becoming failed state. It better have a functioning government soon. Because Egypt, saudi, Nigeria, Kenya (somalia,Yemen) are all now either unstable or going to be unstable soon.

Iraq is not afghanistan. The power that be better not try being clever and run bunch of social experiment, trial & error policy or hackeries.

If the next double dip recession if followed with spike on price (commodity/food stuff)... Egypt, nigeria, Yemen, Kenya,...are going to blow one after another within 5 years.


"Be nice to America or we'll bring you democracy."

About time it's over. Now, they can move on to the civil war we promised them when we took out Saddam.


1st I do not think the lines of interest are where they are published - read up on the history of cooperation between Iran and the US
2nd from reading the press - which is not a good way to judge things - agreed - i get the impression that it is the US that is getting torn apart internally by people whose life style does not mix - and whose alliances are in doubt - but maybe that is what politics fundamentally is about -
3rd - I once had an evening with a specialist who knows how to read Sumerian script - Europeans are ridiculous to look down on US-Americans because of something like 1000 years which is nothing and European experience was fully integrated anyways - and the British are just as stupidly colonialist, so Europe and the US are basically the same - do you really think there is something new to tell about human beings after 4000 years, and the world starts with you?


The very sick/twisted head of the CFR the neocon/Israel firster Richard Haas is pounding his tin pans calling for Iran 'regime change.

Haas would change his neocon tune if his backside was strapped to a boomlet headed for Tehran, then Mr. Haas would do a quick about face on his neocon Iran war stuff.

It's individuals like Haas that make me want to thrown their arses out the back end of a 130 low level as it enters Iranian airspace. Then watch their neocon roach arses scramble.

Haas is just like the rest of the neocon/Israel firsters who promoted the Iraq war, they don't care how many American boys/girls die for Israel's fascist state. Haas is one more neocon who has never worn a uniform or has seen war first hand. Haas makes me sick, too bad he can't be tried at a Nuremburg II and stuck in a jail cell for his unnecessary Iran war promotions propaganda on behalf of a foreign postage stamp called Israel.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

July 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by Typepad