« From UBL's point of view, a very good Sunday on TV | Main | The CIA and the passion of the wogs. »

04 January 2010

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

N. M. Salamon

You are, unfortunately right, Colonel.

Along the same lines, you [and others] may wish to peruse:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24310.htm

how China and the USA go on their divergent ways and the economic consequences for their respective citizens.

Enjoy!

Jonathan

Today Juan Cole has a longish post on Afghanistan (http://juancole.com/)including the following excerpt. I wonder if you think his concerns are reasonable. I presume you do.
.
Then on Thursday, all hell broke loose when a high-level Pashtun asset who had been informing to the CIA on the location of important al-Qaeda and Taliban operatives detonated a vest bomb at FOB Chapman in Khost province, a CIA forward base. The attacker killed 7 field officers and one Jordanian intelligence operative detailed to the base. Those experienced field officers were on the front lines in the fight against al-Qaeda and their loss is a big blow to counter-terrorism. It is true that they had been drawn in to a campaign of assassination, but it is the president who gave them that task--unwisely, in my view.

The use of a double agent not only to misinform but actually to kill the most experienced counter-terrorism officers in the region showed the sophistication of tactical thinking in the Afghan insurgency.

The CIA's dependence on a double agent who finally openly betrayed them raises troubling questions about US strategy and tactics in the region. Such informants essentially direct CIA drone missile strikes.

You could imagine Siraj Haqqani, leader of the Haqqani Network in Khost and over the border in Pakistan's North Waziristan, inserting such a double agent into FOB Chapman and then using the CIA. For instance, what if a middling member of the Haqqani network launched a challenge to Siraj's leadership and that of his ailing father, Jalaluddin (an old-time ally of Reagan who was warmly greeted in the White House in the 1980s)? Wouldn't it be easy enough just to have the double agent tell the CIA that the challenger is a really bad guy in cahoots with al-Qaeda? Boom. Drone strike kills Taliban leaders in North Waziristan. In this way, Siraj could have used the US to eliminate rivals and become more and more powerful. And how many double agents have given up a few Arab jihadis who had fallen out with the Haqqanis, but then deliberately followed this up with bad intel on some innocent village, making the name of the US mud among the Pashtuns?

The drone strikes shouldn't be run by the CIA, and probably shouldn't be run at all. It could well be that savvy old-time Mujahidin trained in CIA tradecraft in the 1980s are having our young wet behind the ears field officers for lunch.

In short, is the bombing at FOB Chapman the tip of an iceberg of misinformation, on which the Titanic of Obama's AfPak policy could well founder?

J_B_V

Amen,

The neo-con/liberal mythology of how America is under dire threat unless we convert these people continues to flabbergast.

A bit off the point but this morning i was thinking, why am I still paying $3 and change for a gallon of gas in Chicago? Isn't it judgement enough that our bad colonial wars have got us to the point where we are (STILL) putting an extra billion into some Saudi playboy prince who, once the thrills of party life wear off, will decide to outfit an armed populist revolt.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

July 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by Typepad