« The McCain/Palin Administration - Not! | Main | Will OPEC production cuts work? »

24 October 2008

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Deus Vult

> This is the great weakness of the international movement of the takfiri jihadis. They are vulnerable everywhere to armed rejection by those they wish to "save."

Let's be grateful that here in the US we can reject our own version of them at the ballot box. As, one hopes, is about to happen.

jmc5588

Nobody wants to be made "pure" according to someone else's conception of "purity."

Col Lang,

In this sentence you have captured a fundamental principle of human organization. It applies as much to the "culture war" in our own country as to Waziristan. Well done.

Arun

This relates to the NWFP, not the tribal areas, but the NWFPers were once Gandhian civil-disobedience types -

"...Parshotam Mehra, The North-West Frontier Drama, 1945–1947. Combing through long unexamined records, the author found that in 1932, the NWFP, with a population of just 3 million, accounted for 5,557 convictions for civil disobedience compared with 1,620 in the Punjab, which had five times as many inhabitants."

-- What they might have become and what they actually became -- the moral of the story, if any, is that once you give in to religion-based politics, there is no end to the downhill slide.


condfusedponderer
This is the great weakness of the international movement of the takfiri jihadis. They are vulnerable everywhere to armed rejection by those they wish to "save."
Gilles Keppel made a similar observation looking at Islamist terror in Algeria. He said that the indiscriminate violence that tafkiris use alienates their supporters. It means that their radicalism is self-defeating.

The comforting aspect of it is that it underlines that a global Islamofacism (the word wasn't yet coined at that time) is a fantasy. I think the point is compelling. That doesn't make those people less dangerous as far as acts of terror are concerned, but it suggests the threat is manageable.

McGee

Arum wrote: "What they might have become and what they actually became -- the moral of the story, if any, is that once you give in to religion-based politics, there is no end to the downhill slide.?"

Bingo....and why our current efforts in Iraq have little chance of ulitimate success, though we had little choice once we went in there.


William R. Cumming

Do the tribal areas have any real outside influences on their daily lives and outlooks? Is there religious coherence in these areas? Certain sects of Islam? My concern is that the US must keep its hand hidden to some degree if even the central government of Pakistan has not been able to figure out how to bring about any transformation since the split with India. US airstrikes seem a very crude use of technology to make up for our deficiencies in knowledge of culture and language. The Pakistani government at least has the benefit of language and religion on their side. Worried about the long term not short term. It seems to me that the primary interest of the US in Pakistan is nuclear surety issues and policies. Am I wrong?

Ael

Actually, I believe that the Taliban are a strong political segment of the Pashtun. They are not outsiders to the tribal areas.

Kevin

"This may bring on civil war in tribal territory? Quite possibly"

Would balkanization spill over into Iran as well?

fnord

btw, recommended reading: Fredrik Barth, my countrys great anthropologist who did field research among the Pashtuns in the 50s is out with a new book, "Taleban and the Pashtuns". Havent read it yet and dont know if its translated yet, but his conclusions are that a hearts and mind campaign among the pashtuns is next to useless, unless we are willing to spend serious money to give them all swimmingpools and shit.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

February 2021

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28            
Blog powered by Typepad