« Karzai and Kipling | Main | Plus and Minus in Iraq's Forces »

22 September 2005


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Some Guy

I heard Gerecht. I almost spit my drink out. When he accused the military of basically being skittish and not wanting to fight a real insurgency, all I could think is "well get a rifle and get busy then you fool, this was your idea." He sounded very much like an architect complaining about the low quality of contractors building his latest home design.

The planners bear the blame for not being serious, not the "military." As a dyed in the wool opponent to this invasion, I think it is most ironic that one of its architects would engage in broad handed military bashing when all along war-boosters have been trying to put those words in the mouths of people me.

Some of my students are over there, one of them hunting IEDs day in and day out, and I don't think they would be impressed with Mr. Gerecht.



here's pbs's link on Gerecht's latest diatribe:



do you know how 'long' that Gerecht was an 'analyst'? was it a sum total of 5 minutes?



isn't it amazing how politicans squirm when they get caught with their greedy little mitts in the cookie jar? iraq's allawi's aides are screaming like a bunch of stuck pigs regarding their $1bill rip off of iraq's defense funds. alawai's aide is blaming iran for all his-their troubles.

soowie, soowie, soowie. maybe we should have put some boar hogs in there when we put the corrupt alawi and his henchmen in, that way when they acted like sows, the boars could have nailed them to the wall. lol

Allawi aide says Iran behind "smear campaign":


Colonel Lang wrote: "Any competent military planner prepares to deal with the worst eventuality. The worst case here is that at some future time we will need unimpeded access to the roads that run south through Basra."

Something I have been thinking about recently. When we begin the process of withdrawal of our troops from Iraq, could they become more vulnerable to insurgent attacks? If so, I hope that we would plan a withdrawal in such a way that it provides the maximum protection for our troops. Given the lack of planning that was done for the occupation of Iraq, I don't know if we can take this for granted.

W. Patrick Lang

Alvord I see that you get the point. Let us hope that everyone does. Pl


Well, we have carried out very large troop rotations before.

In that kind of situation I have faith in the generals to get our troops out relatively intact. In the worst case scenario, I think we'd see B-52s carving out swaths of destruction before any sort of Athenian Expedition-style disaster. Besides, I think the insurgents would be gearing up for the real civil war to take place after the U.S. forces left and wouldn't waste too many men or munitions to speed a departing guest.


Haven been down that road, I don't think it will be too much trouble. Plenty of unobstructed views and open lands. Pretty much smooth sailing south of Diwaniya.

About the Brits, it sounds like a Sadrist set-up "shari'a" court to me, with the collaboration of local police and an ad-hoc jail. We shall see.


Haven been down that road, I don't think it will be too much trouble. Plenty of unobstructed views and open lands. Pretty much smooth sailing south of Diwaniya.

Hmm - how many bridges to cross? If Sadr, or even worse Sistani, would want the south to shut down all American traffic there would be a huge problem.

If the resistance blows up all bridges in the path are you sure your bridging equipment will be on that side of the river where you need it?


Yes. A totally inept humiliating cockup. It seems Soft Hats didn't work either.

Some British military types are grumbling that all was in order in Basra until Tony Blair ordered them off the streets in preparation for the election. The leak of MOD memo recommending a big Brit drawdown was hardly a useful signal either.

But isn't this just exposing one of the most basic flaws in the political plan: the big Shi'a parties all have close links with Tehran and militias. Put a police uniform on a militiaman and he is not magically transformed into a loyal servant of the state; especially if the state looks likely to fragment into ethnic components.

Pat Lang



Just to show you that us Yanks are not immune from this kind of foolishness, a lot of these "policemen" were selected based on a questionnaire they filled out which asked them if they were loyal to the new government. An American consultant produced that questionnaire. pl

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

February 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Blog powered by Typepad